Hmm, I guess that's a question for Dallas. This is the version I'm
using:
# file: sa-stats.pl
# date: 2005-08-03
# version: 1.0
# author: Dallas Engelken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# desc: SA 3.1.x log parser
I don't seem to be the only one showing that strange math. Dave had the
same sort of entry in his:
TOP HAM RULES FIRED
RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM
1 HTML_MESSAGE 63067 21.17 21.46 63.61 56.74
Dallas, is there a bug or are we interpreting these numbers incorrectly?
Kris
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 10:48 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Post your top 10 from sa-stats
Kristopher Austin wrote:
> RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM
> %OFHAM
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 1 HTML_MESSAGE 45870 5.13 27.72 70.37
> 55.36
Wait... so 27% of all mail is HTML, 70% of spam is HTML, and 55% of ham
is HTML?
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
