Config Help

atly appreciated! Thanks Joey

RE: Config Help

-Original Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 1:23 PM To: Joey; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Config Help At 12:52 PM 10/6/2004, Joey wrote: >In upgrading to 3.0 from 2.x there seems to be some confusion with the >lo

RE: Config Help

, and any rules we created there, as well as surbl.cf, and whitelists etc? Should we put our whielist stuff infor local.cf or should we have something like whitelist.cf? Thanks ! -Original Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 1

RE: more spam since upgrade

I haven't seen that with the upgrade, did the required_hits get raised by any chance with a new config? Also this is off your topic but helpful are you using Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL This has worked very well for us. http://www.surbl.org/ Joey -Original Message-

RE: Bit OT but it's about SPAM

> > > > > > See, for example: > > > http://www.bcs.org/server.php?show=conWebDoc.14617 > > > > > I am seeing in the 90% range but that doesn't include the millions I block via firewall lists etc. I think this also varies more when you look at secondary and triciary servers which tend to get hit a lot more from spam. I think those numbers are defiantly in the neighborhood Joey

Help figuring our why SA is taking like 1.5 minutes to filter...

s in each of my SA folders as well as some of the config files: http://web56.net/reference/spamassassin-config.html I noticed a few vXXX.pre files, should I erase the older ones, or does it execute them all together? I also use RulesDuJour daily to get updated cf files. Any help is appreciated! Thanks, Joey

RE: Help figuring our why SA is taking like 1.5 minutes to filter...

From: Pedro Correia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 9:35 AM To: 'Joey' Subject: RE: Help figuring our why SA is taking like 1.5 minutes to filter... Are you running SA on the same box as the mail server? I transfered my SA instalation to a dedicat

Blank Subject & Body

I forgot to mention that I am also getting messages sent with no body & subject, which is defiantly being stripped by SA, not sure why, this used to work well. Thanks!

Confirm configuration settings

Hello All, After my post Help figuring our why SA is taking like 1.5 minutes to filter I decided to kind of clean up my configuration and also get rid of RulesDeJour. I now have configured sa-update with the following: Cron updates daily with the following: /usr/bin/sa-update --channel

Mail getting stripped and delivered blank

{ echo Message content rejected; exit $EX_UNAVAILABLE; } exit 0 Any help is appreciated! Joey

RE: Confirm configuration settings

> -Original Message- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 8:38 AM > To: Joey > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Confirm configuration settings > > > > > After my post Help figuring our why

RE: Spamd HIGH LOAD

w any way to solve it? Please look the attach file( top -d1 ). Thank you so munch ! _ Try running /usr/bin/sa-update -D, then restart SA see if this helps. Also do you run rulesdajour? Joey

RE: Confirm configuration settings

> -Original Message- > From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 11:22 PM > To: Joey > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Confirm configuration settings > > Joey wrote: > > >> A lot of th

RPM -vs- CPAN install

Hi guys,   is there any real advantage to using cpan or source code over rpms, if I don't really do any code modifications etc to spamassasin? Also in respect to that if I am currently running a cpan installed version and then decide to just go RPM's so that maintaining the updates are easi

Installation Issues

e same errors on both FC4 & RHES3 I read through INSTALL and UPGRADE and believe I have all additional required modules, but just can't get this to work... any help appreciated! Joey

Configuration Question

OK I have converted over to the latest version and have mosting things running well. I wanted to confirm how to properly use SURBL's in the previous version I used a .cf file, however the docs say 3.0 and higher come with SURBL support. is the URIDNSBL the same thing which you activate from init.p

RE: Greylisting

the greylisting. Personally I get about 40 fewer spam messages a DAY because of greylisting and I am not willing to give it up just yet. Joey -Original Message- From: John Andersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 11:10 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re:

RE: Poor man's high MX spam Trap

-Original Message- From: John Rudd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 1:20 AM To: David B Funk Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Poor man's high MX spam Trap David B Funk wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, John Rudd wrote: > >> It doesn't have to be firewa

RulesDuJour Recommendation

on. I didn't want to load them all because I felt that it may be too aggressive and cause many client complaints. Also if you have found any solutions for the recent barrage of image spam I would appreciate you sharing them with me. Thanks!!! Joey

Surbl / SPAMCop URI ?

OK on this web site http://spamcheck.freeapp.net/ they have a list located here http://spamcheck.freeapp.net/top-sites-domains which contains info from http://www.surbl.org/. I wrote a script to download the list and put into body_checks (postfix) and reject the message that meet the criteria. Th

RE: General assistance

Dave, What paramters are you using for logging with the caching name server? I currently use this: logging { category lame-servers { null; }; }; Thanks, Joey -Original Message- From: DAve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 12:28 PM To: users

Help with config... I went a LITTLE overboard

OK I got a little greedy in hoping to stop more spam, to the point that I am making my servers crawl. I read through the rules and I thought the difference between lets say SARE_EVILNUMBERS0 SARE_EVILNUMBERS1 was that 1 was a little more aggressive and if you used 1 you should also use 0 and so on

RE: Help with config... I went a LITTLE overboard

f the files I am using not really being effective and just burning cpu cycles, then I guess that is where everyone's experience can help me. I do understand what your saying with the fact that the cf file resides in the directory as well as appreciate the script idea. Thanks, Joey ---

RE: Help with config... I went a LITTLE overboard

I missed that... Got it. THanks -Original Message- From: Dave Pooser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 1:05 PM To: SpamAssassin Subject: Re: Help with config... I went a LITTLE overboard > SARE_HTML > SARE_HTML0 > SARE_HTML1 > SARE_HTML2 > SARE_HTML3 > SARE_HTM

RE: Help with config... I went a LITTLE overboard

Wouldn't the SARE_SPAMCOP_TOP200 already be working if you use spamcop in the RBL? Thanks -Original Message- From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 12:56 PM To: Joey; SpamAssassin Subject: Re: Help with config... I went a LITTLE overboard

RE: GIF stock spams

Hi Ruben, Sorry to be such a nube, but can you tell me exactly what I need to do to impliment what is working for you. These damn image files are killing us. Thanks, Joey -Original Message- From: Ruben Cardenal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 11:45 AM To

RE: GIF stock spams

canner 2.00 RC1 . Good luck, Ruben > -Mensaje original- > De: Joey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Enviado el: viernes, 24 de febrero de 2006 18:47 > Para: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Asunto: RE: GIF stock spams > > > Hi Ruben, > > Sorry to be such a nube, b

RE: GIF stock spams

nner patch (you can find it at http://toribio.apollinare.org/qmail-scanner/) That kind of funcinality has been added in the Qmail-Scanner 2.00 RC1 . Good luck, Ruben > -Mensaje original- > De: Joey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Enviado el: viernes, 24 de febrero de 2006 18:47 > Pa

Problem with SA / Razor

I keep getting the below message in maillog, but when I installed Razor via cpan, I had NO errors. I appreciate your help... Joey Mar 1 13:42:50 pluto spamd[7790]: Can't locate Razor2/Client/Agent.pm in @INC (@INC contains: ../lib /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /us

RE: Problem with SA / Razor

alled correctly. I'd reinstall and see if this clears the problem up. -Original Message----- From: Joey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 12:42 PM To: SpamAssassin Subject: Problem with SA / Razor I keep getting the below message in maillog, but when I installed Razor v

How to Block messages from display name not matching expected sender email address

;Boss Man" and if so, make sure the sending email address is boss...@realcompany.com or boss...@company2.com, otherwise score it with 10. Also, would there be a way to forward that email to a specific user, not send it to the original recipient? Thanks -- Thanks! Joey

BCC Rule and Subject change for specific rule

ich is scored a 10, but only the specific rule. Is there a way for me to accomplish this set of actions? Thanks! -- Thanks! Joey

Re: BCC Rule and Subject change for specific rule

Thanks for the follow up. I understand what you are saying. This is SA within ProxMox Mail gateway, I added my custom rule via SA which is working, just this additional function. On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 8:23 PM John Hardin wrote: > On Mon, 4 Jan 2021, Joey J wrote: > > > If I

RBL via Spamassasin configuration

e answer is no, it simply scores it, but wanted to be sure) Thanks! -- Thanks! Joey

Re: RBL via Spamassasin configuration

Thank you, this makes sense, I will look through the mentioned resource. On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 5:28 PM Bill Cole < sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com> wrote: > On 2022-06-28 at 14:38:16 UTC-0400 (Tue, 28 Jun 2022 14:38:16 -0400) > Joey J > is rumored to have said:

Re: RBL via Spamassasin configuration

> wrote: > On 2022-06-28 at 14:38:16 UTC-0400 (Tue, 28 Jun 2022 14:38:16 -0400) > Joey J > is rumored to have said: > > > Hello All, > > > > In trying to setup RBL's with SA, I wanted to make sure the proper way > > to > > do it. &

Block IP's for certain domains based on list

here, but trying to almost make my own ACL. Thanks -- Thanks! Joey

Re: Block IP's for certain domains based on list

ng it. I agree don't re-invent, but some clients have many providers that send email on their behalf making it more complicated. On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 10:08 AM Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 21.07.22 um 22:58 schrieb Joey J: > > Hello, > > > > Is there a way for

How to incorporate network blocks

ncorporate: feeds.dshield.org/block.txt spamhaus.org/drop/drop.lasso ciarmy.com/list/ci-badguys.txt openbl.org/lists/base.txt Thanks! -- Thanks! Joey

Whitelist or add negative values for score

to see if there is if email is from j...@company.com AND is from IP address 1.2.3.4, then lets take away 2 from the score, hopefully allowing those legitimate types of messages through. I couldn't find an example on how to accomplish this dual criteria check. Any assistance is apreciated. -- Thanks! Joey

Re: Whitelist or add negative values for score

Thanks, So welcomelist_from_rcvd j...@company.com [1.2.3.4] Is saying if it's received from j...@company.com and the IP combination? And then simply score it welcomelist_from_rcvd score -2 I will try that thank you! On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 8:39 PM Greg Troxel wrote: > > Joe

Re: Whitelist or add negative values for score

Actually, what would be the format, in respect to header for that rule? so header welcomelist_from_rcvd j...@company.com [1.2.3.4] On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 8:39 PM Greg Troxel wrote: > > Joey J writes: > > > I'm trying to see if there is a "best way" to

Re: Whitelist or add negative values for score

RATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 6:14 AM Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 19.12.22 20:05, Joey J wrote: > >I'm trying to see if there is a "best way" to provide nega

Re: Whitelist or add negative values for score

gt; had a bad DKIM signature. > > > -- > Bill Cole > b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org > (AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses) > Not Currently Available For Hire > -- Thanks! Joey

Re: Whitelist or add negative values for score

IP address. DKIM is just nicer if > you can get them to do it. > -- Thanks! Joey

Re: Whitelist or add negative values for score

2E16D)) Dec 19 19:39:47 mgw postfix/qmgr[5368]: 1270980A01: removed On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 2:24 AM Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 21.12.22 15:48, Joey J wrote: > >Thank you for pointing me in the better direction. > >Since not many people are

Rule Help - not sure what is wrong with my syntax

@example3\.com$/) { return 1; } return 0; } -- Thanks! Joey

Re: Rule Help - not sure what is wrong with my syntax

:57 PM John Hardin wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jan 2023, John Hardin wrote: > > > On Thu, 12 Jan 2023, Martin Gregorie wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 18:39 -0500, Joey J wrote: > >>> Hello All, > >>> > >>> I created this rule to

FROM_RETURNPATH_MISMATCH

Hello All, I'm trying to understand why SA keeps scoring this rule, when the sender only has their from address, no reply to etc, nothing helping me to understand why. I'm guessing here, but this would be where the reply to differs from the from? Any assistance appreciated. -- Thanks! Joey

Assistance with rule

's found, see the sending IP, if that matches gives a negative score. Is there a better way? Also is there some kind of rule tester you can use where you put a rule, put some headers and see what it evaluates? -- Thanks! Joey

Re: FROM_RETURNPATH_MISMATCH

04.23 10:58, Joey J wrote: > >I'm trying to understand why SA keeps scoring this rule, when the sender > >only has their from address, no reply to etc, nothing helping me to > >understand why. > > > >I'm guessing here, but this would be where the reply to

Re: Assistance with rule

antomas wrote: > On 28.04.23 11:04, Joey J wrote: > >I have this rule which I thought looked good, but doesn't seem to ever > kick > >in. > > >header FROM_TEST_IP_AND_EMAIL From =~ /sender@sender\.com/i && Received > =~ /from 138\.193\.30\.7/ > > >I wa

Re: Spamassassin with single link in body

Unsubscribe On 6/25/13 12:37 PM, "Celene" wrote: >Hi, >I am currently getting lots of messages with just a single url in them. >Is there a way for spamassassin to match those? > >Example: http://pastebin.com/UZtzfyEs

spamassassin not working - spamass.sock unsafe

): local socket name /var/run/spamass-milter/spamass.sock unsafe Mar 19 17:28:32 obwat sendmail[29903]: l2JMSW21029903: Milter (spamassassin): to error state Mar 19 17:28:32 obwat sendmail[29903]: l2JMSW21029903: Milter: initialization failed, temp failing commands Thanks for any help, Joey

RE: spamassassin not working - spamass.sock unsafe

Don't think it's a permission problem, at least not on this directory. drwx-- 2 sa-milt sa-milt 1024 Mar 19 17:29 spamass-milter Joey From: CPTeam Hostmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 8:17 PM To: 'Joey Dav

RE: spamassassin not working - spamass.sock unsafe

. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 8:14 PM To: Joey Davis Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: spamassassin not working - spamass.sock unsafe Joey Davis wrote: > Greetings ... > > I can not get spamassassin to work. I have seen this problem in som

RE: spamassassin not working - spamass.sock unsafe

: spamassassin not working - spamass.sock unsafe At 19:08 19-03-2007, Joey Davis wrote: >Don't think it's a permission problem, at least not on this directory. > >drwx-- 2 sa-milt sa-milt 1024 Mar 19 17:29 spamass-milter The milter is not running. Start it. Regards, -sm

RE: spamassassin not working - spamass.sock unsafe

Thanks for your kind response. That change did resolve the problem. Appreciatively, Joey -Original Message- From: SM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 3:01 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: spamassassin not working - spamass.sock unsafe At 11

Spamassassin and memory utilization

I am running into memory allocation problems and am not sure how to resolve it. My question: Is it advisable to limit the number of child processes started by spamassassin in my situation. I'm green and not sure how to handle this. I am on a VPS with thirty email users. Tasks: 21 total,

RE: Spamassassin and memory utilization

Sorry, I intended to included this entry from the messages log: Apr 10 00:00:02 msop sendmail[1622]: unable to dlopen /usr/lib/sasl2/libcrammd5.so.2: /usr/lib/sasl2/libcrammd5.so.2: failed to map segment from shared object: Cannot allocate memory Thanks, Joey -Original Message- From