Actually, what would be the format, in respect to header for that rule? so header welcomelist_from_rcvd j...@company.com [1.2.3.4]
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 8:39 PM Greg Troxel <g...@lexort.com> wrote: > > Joey J <jacklistm...@gmail.com> writes: > > > I'm trying to see if there is a "best way" to provide negative scoring > for > > a certain persons email. > > That's easy. There are many ways, but not best way. > > > As an example if j...@company.com is communicating with paypal or other > real > > banking institutions, then at times within the email chain, SA will tag > it > > as spam. > > It's really not clear what your issue is. > > > I want to see if there is if email is from j...@company.com AND is from > IP > > address 1.2.3.4, then lets take away 2 from the score, hopefully allowing > > those legitimate types of messages through. > > I couldn't find an example on how to accomplish this dual criteria check. > > Any assistance is apreciated. > > welcomelist_from_rcvd j...@company.com [1.2.3.4] > > should work, but -100. It would be nice if welcomelist_* could take a > score, but it you are sure you want *your* SA to not mark it as spam, > -100 is the way to spell that. > -- Thanks! Joey
