spam box is delivered into the
inbox. It shows that the messages are over the required number of hits
but they are being delivered instead of deleted.
Any ideas on what I did wrong or to make it work?
Thanks,
George
happen sometimes, when no other processess
are running.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
George
der
error: (Content-Length mismatch: Expected 8289 bytes, got 8123 bytes)
at /usr/bin/spamd line 1676, line 252.\n
Thanks for the help.
George
Just wondering what the process is for moving the rules from SVN into
sa-updates?
As a possible workaround, can the entire meta rule be copied into local.cf?
Will this override the one in 20_meta_test.cf?
Thanks for your time
George
I'm having trouble with intracompany e-mail. When a Windows/Outlook user
sends mail to a local user, there is exactly one MX in the path.
Which is the office mail server.
Everything is wonderful until Spamassassin sees the short delivery path
and assigns 2.8 points because of it, and a few other
> The best way is to tell your glue layer not to pass internal-to-internal
> mails to SA in the first place.
>
> What is your MTA (I'm assuming qmail) and how is SA hooked into it?
It's qmail (yes, I know; it REALLY should be replaced...), and SA
is hooked in via the .qmail delivery file. So it
Michael Scheidell wrote:
> put all of your local ip addresses in internal_networks.
> you will avoid unnecessary rbl lookups, spf failures and it should set a
> ALL_TRUSTED flag also.
Bingo, that's the clue I needed. Thank you very much.
Sorry it didn't dawn on me to read the .cf file carefully
acted:
From: Shane Murphy
Subject:Re: Your background may have been searched by your
employer.
Date: September 4, 2014 11:13:35 AM MDT
To: George Johnson <>
Return-Path:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (201
David F. Skoll wrote
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 11:02:27 -0700 (PDT)
> George Johnson <
> georgejohnson@
> > wrote:
>
>> I'm getting another slew of these this morning, all with a variety of
>> strange headers added apparently to foil spam filtering. All are
>
sm-7 wrote
> Hi George,
> At 11:02 04-09-2014, George Johnson wrote:
>>I'm getting another slew of these this morning, all with a variety of
strange
>>headers added apparently to foil spam filtering. All are getting through
my
>>spamassassin set up, which is usuall
This?
https://github.com/maxmind/geoip-api-perl/pull/22
If you click 'Files changed' you'll see the path, and see the fix.
On 10/14/15 11:49 AM, a...@satester.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We activated the relay country plugin yesterday. As part of the process
> we did a yum install perl-Geo-IP. Now w
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
[...] Here's an example to show what I mean.
From: Ackermanmloz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did you whitelist mail from or to the prime.gushi.org domain, or to danm?
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on prime.gushi.org
X-Spam-Sta
/razor.confsubject_tag **sPaM-aLeRt**rewrite_subject
1
Any help would be
appreciated.
Scott George
Customer Support Engineer
Digital Controls
Corporation
Technology Services Group
444 Alexandersville Road
Miamisburg, OH
45342
I was wondering if
anybody knows of a script that pulls SA information from the syslog, like
pflogsumm does for Postifx?
I could write my
own, but I don't want to re-invent and existing wheel if there is
one.
TIA
Scott George
Customer Support Engineer
Digital Controls
Corporation
I don't want SA even checking the network. how do
I disable it completely?
// George
--
George Georgalis, systems architect, administrator Linux BSD IXOYE
http://galis.org/george/ cell:646-331-2027 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 02:03:36PM -0500, George Georgalis wrote:
>In any event, how is it disabled? I'm getting false negatives...
>
>-2.8 ALL_TRUSTEDDid not pass through any untrusted hosts
>
>In my setup SA doesn't get _any_ trusted network connection
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 03:13:50PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
>At 02:11 PM 11/1/2004, George Georgalis wrote:
>>those false negatives are also growing an AWL, which I also don't want.
>>
>>-1.4 AWLAWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
>>
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 10:24:57AM +, Sean Doherty wrote:
>On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 20:37, George Georgalis wrote:
>
>> skip_rbl_checks 1
>> use_bayes 0
>>
>> noautolearn 1
>> use_auto_whitelist 0
>> score AWL 0.001
>>
>> trusted_netwo
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 01:03:02PM +, Sean Doherty wrote:
>On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 12:50, George Georgalis wrote:
>> >Do you mean -0.001? Why would you want to penalise mail
>> >coming thru a trusted path?
>>
>> It really doesn't matter to me what the s
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 03:40:02PM +, Sean Doherty wrote:
>On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 15:16, George Georgalis wrote:
>
>> >> The setup I use routes mail at the tcp level, it's basically impossible
>> >> for a message to reach spam assassin if it's from
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 09:46:55AM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
>George Georgalis writes:
>> On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 01:03:02PM +, Sean Doherty wrote:
>> >On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 12:50, George Georgalis wrote:
>> >> >Do you mean -0.001? Why would you want to p
s published and RDJ is further modified to update, and use that file
(if undefined in config). The upgrade should be seamless for everyone.
I'm happy to add that code to my patch if the author(s) wouldn't prefer
doing themself. Thanks!
ses the test BODY_EMPTY was not applied. I am not sure
why that's the case. I also tried with having the rule look at the rawbody
but that somehow matches a lot of real messages and fails to match my test
messages with empty body ?
Can anyone point me in a way to stop this kind of messages ?
Thank you!
George
Thanks for the input Loren!
Should I be applying that rule to body or to rawbody ?
George
-Original Message-
From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 9:53 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin Tests problem
> Can any
es for them but they seem gone now...
// George
--
George Georgalis, systems architect, administrator Linux BSD IXOYE
http://galis.org/george/ cell:646-331-2027 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rather than squelching custom site rules, I think it more appropriate
to verbosely report why rules become obsoleted (not necessarily in the
new ruleset). Maybe a changes file for each cf file is appropriate? You
cannot guarantee what or how anything is done in a local config, let the
admin who cre
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 05:19:38PM -0800, Robert Menschel wrote:
>Hello George,
>
>Wednesday, February 16, 2005, 7:02:58 AM, you wrote:
>
>GG> Rather than squelching custom site rules, I think it more
>GG> appropriate to verbosely report why rules become obsoleted (not
>
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 07:34:44PM -0800, Robert Menschel wrote:
>Hello George,
>
>Wednesday, February 16, 2005, 7:06:16 PM, you wrote:
>
>>>GG> Rather than squelching custom site rules, I think it more
>>>GG> appropriate to verbosely report why rules become
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 10:27:09PM -0800, Robert Menschel wrote:
>Hello George,
>
>Wednesday, February 16, 2005, 9:38:41 PM, you wrote:
>
>GG> Even if someone doesn't use RDJ, isn't a 2-10 line commented change log
>GG> in the cf file worthwhile?
>
>GG
Hi Bob,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 06:11:49PM -0800, Robert Menschel wrote:
>Hello George,
>
>Thursday, February 17, 2005, 8:16:21 AM, you wrote:
>
>>>Fair enough. In this most recent publication of updates to the
>>>70_sare_header*.cf family, 40 rules were added, a
Didn't realize this was a on list with my private reply
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 04:51:08PM -0600, Chris Thielen wrote:
>George,
>
>>Maybe the way RDJ does the roll back needs be addressed? I know version
>>2 is nearing release, and this wouldn't be difficult to a
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 07:57:54PM -0800, Robert Menschel wrote:
>Hello George,
>
>Thursday, February 17, 2005, 7:43:27 PM, you wrote:
>
>GG> I count approximately 35 active cf files in rulesemporium. Of course the
>GG> changes aren't evenly distributed, but that'
I can't
>be sure.
I'm overloaded and haven't had the chance to try...
>George Georgalis (and others): I've made a first pass at incorporating
>your suggestions for a change log into these files. There's a new
>file, http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sa
>>-Original Message-
>>From: George Georgalis
>>Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 10:15 AM
>>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>>Subject: Re: [SARE] Rules updates: URI
>
>Regarding the comment on too much disclosure in the logs, there is
>nothing keep
m fairly certain. If anyone is experiencing
the problem please contact me on or off the list.
A sure sign of it is no logs (with debug) for remote
sa connections which score "0/0" and correct operation
with "cat spam.txt | spamc -R"; fix is to use the
older kernel.
// George
>On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 02:16:03 -0500, George Georgalis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm very defiantly seeing a problem with the 2.6.11
>> kernel and my spamassassin setup. However, it's not
>> clear exactly where the problem is, seems like sa
>> but
Is anyone successfully runing SA on a 2.6.11 linux kernel?
>On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 02:16:03 -0500, George Georgalis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm very defiantly seeing a problem with the 2.6.11
>> kernel and my spamassassin setup. However, it's not
>> clea
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 04:53:58PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
>At 04:40 PM 3/3/2005, George Georgalis wrote:
>>This log entry indicates when I booted into 2.6.11:
>>2005-03-02 12:05:47.018334500 2005-03-02 17:05:47 [781] i: server killed
>>by SIGTERM, shutting down
>
>
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 01:37:03PM +, Nix wrote:
>On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, George Georgalis uttered the following:
>> I recall a problem a while back with a pipe from
>> /proc/kmsg that was sent by root to a program with a
>> user uid. The fix was to run the logging program
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:58:14AM -0500, George Georgalis wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 01:37:03PM +, Nix wrote:
>>On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, George Georgalis uttered the following:
>>> I recall a problem a while back with a pipe from
>>> /proc/kmsg that was sent
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 12:19:53 -0500, George Georgalis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:58:14AM -0500, George Georgalis wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 01:37:03PM +, Nix wrote:
> >>On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, George Georgalis uttered the following:
&g
w revs
back (2.6.7?). I'm seeing a similar failed read from /dev/rtc and
mplayer with 2.6.10, now too.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/3/8/226
while read file; do mplayer $file ; done http://galis.org/george/ cell:646-331-2027 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not sure why this is happening but I just received an e-mail that I use ONLY
with go daddy. The e-mail is: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In it I have receivedSPAM!
Is Go Daddy selling our e-mails to the lowest of the lowest ?
Guys..beware!
Here's what I got:
OEM
What is it? OEM stands for "Original
: George Breahna
Subject: Re: Godaddy selling e-mails ?
>
>
> Not sure why this is happening but I just received an e-mail that I
> use ONLY with go daddy. The e-mail is: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Does said email address show up in the WHOIS for the domain?
Tuc
Message-
From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 12:57 AM
To: George Breahna; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Godaddy selling e-mails ?
Post the headers.
How do you know it isn't spoofed?
- Original Message -
From: "George Breahna"
I would recommend FreeBSD + Qmail as MTA.
My company runs an e-mail outsourcing business and this combination has done
wonders for us.
-George
On 5/12/2005 12:54 PM, Ben Wylie wrote:
> Currently I am running my mailserver on a windows box.
> would like to migrate my mailserver onto this
I can swear I saw this question in at least 20 different messages, not to
mention the website
I really recommend you research your question before asking it.
autolearn=no means that it didn't 'learn' this message.
Other possible states are 'spam, 'ham' and ... 'DISABLED'
If autolearn were to be
I have a problem with a few of my users that have spanish usernames ( this
is the only difference I can think of )
In any case, here's the problem:
Sending a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] generates a score of 0.1 and thus no
problems:
The performed tests are the following:
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE
I get plenty of weird looking messages in my spamassassin logs.
Some of them look like this:
Clear:RC:1(69.49.133.21):SA:0(?/?):
Usually, it should say something like (20.0/5.0) but I get question marks!
What could it mean ?
George
Spamd is running properly, as the very next message has a proper score.
What else can cause this ?
On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 14:24, George Breahna wrote:
> I get plenty of weird looking messages in my spamassassin logs.
>
> Some of them look like this:
>
> Clear:RC:1(69.
HI
I had a query, i am using a webmail interface called squerrel mail , i need
to make changes on the ./conf.pl file ( folders option ) so that when the
user first time logs a folder called spam is already created . can this be
possible ??
Agnello . G .Dsouza
Hi
i have installed amavisd new on my postfix mailserver. Now i need to test
spam , so I sent a mail with the following text in the body ( see link )
.. this is found at http://spamassassin.apache.org/gtube/ .
As per the logs the mal is being blocked, but our requirement is that it
should be b
n all tests)
Another approach might be simpler to integrate than above, simply
do all the negative score tests first and pull out if the score
gets to spam level.
// George
--
George Georgalis, information system scientist <
ch can kill remaining tests and short circut. eg anytime in the
hierachy the score is above what the negative test can fix, etc.
Appreciate the discussion thus far, unfortunately discussion is
all I'm able to contribute at this time.
Thanks,
// George
--
George Georgalis, information system scientist <
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 05:24:00PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
>
>Jim Maul writes:
>> Justin Mason wrote:
>> > John D. Hardin writes:
>> >> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, George Georgalis wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 09:41:58AM -0800
HI
There is a client requiremt for mails on a windows server to be routed to a
linux based server ( fedora core 7 ) to sacn for spam mails and
then re-routed back to the windows based server has any one done
this before ... and if so how is it done ?..
any links would really b
Hi
I can tel net port 783 on localhost ... but cant telnet it remotely ...how
is that done ...thanks
--
Regards
Agnello Dsouza
www.linux-vashi.blogspot.com
www.bible-study-india.blogspot.com
On 2/19/08, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agnello George wrote:
> > spamd --listen-ip=0.0.0.0 <http://0.0.0.0> --allowed-ips=121.240.XX.X &
> > the child process gets spawned
>
> That's fine, for testing anyway... later when you w
On 2/19/08, Agnello George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/19/08, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Agnello George wrote:
> > > spamd --listen-ip=0.0.0.0 <http://0.0.0.0> --allowed-ips=121.240.XX.X &
> > > the child proces
On 2/19/08, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Agnello George wrote:
> > Hi
> > I can tel net port 783 on localhost ... but cant telnet it remotely
> > ...how is that done ...thanks
> You can do this using spamd's -i parameter:
>
> From man
I have smatermail connecting to my remote system by startin spamd as follows :
spamd -u spamd -d -i -s /var/log/spamd.log --allowed-ips 216.185.
thnen wheni chk the logs i get the following ...why does it show
"for (unknown):500" .. is this a error
Tue Feb 19 19:13:49 2008 [8182] info: spamd
On 2/19/08, Tarak Ranjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi List,
> how do i come to know that each and every incoming &
> outgoing mail is
> massing through SA.
did'nt get your question "massing through SA." ??
--
Regards
Agnello Dsouza
www.linux-vashi.blogspot.com
www.bible-study-india.blogspot.c
On 2/19/08, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agnello George wrote:
> > i have checked the logs and mail sacnning is happeing :-) ... but what
> > i see is the following in the logs :
> >
> > Feb 19 18:37:52 vps1 spamd[7508]: spamd: still runnin
On 2/19/08, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agnello George wrote:
> > On 2/19/08, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>> but when i telnet from 121.240.XX.X it tries to connect ..but the
> >>> conne
i am kind of new to spamassissin, i have some doubts please correct
me if i am wrong
###
Fri Feb 22 21:08:33 2008 [29858] info: spamd: checking message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
(unknown):500
Fri Feb 22 21:08:33 2008 [29858] info: spamd: resul
while starting spamd i was recomended to use the -r switch which Write the
process id to pidfile
Now!! what is a pidfile ... cant find much on google
can any one help me with this basic stuff !!
thanks !!
--
Regards
Agnello Dsouza
www.linux-vashi.blogspot.com
www.bible-study-india.blogspot.co
HI
I want to increase the telnet secession count from default 30 sec to 120 sec
how do i do this
can some one help me here
--
Regards
Agnello Dsouza
www.linux-vashi.blogspot.com
www.bible-study-india.blogspot.com
HI
I had installed my Spamassassin on a linux box ( cent os ) to scan mails
from a windows "Smatermail" server and so far it was working good, but
suddenly it started giving the following error :
Fri Feb 29 00:12:49 2008 [27218] info: spamd: handled cleanup of child pid
19811 due to SIGCHLD
Fri F
hi
I have set up a spamassissin server . I need to rotate the logs in the
/var/log/spamd.log file . I added the following directives in the
/etc/logrotate.conf
# system-specific logs may be also be configured here.
# added by agnello 4 march 08
/var/log/spamd.log {
weekly
compress
rotate 4
}
On 3/4/08, Martin Gregorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 17:54, Agnello George wrote:
> > hi
> >
> > I have set up a spamassissin server . I need to rotate the logs in
> > the /var/log/spamd.log file . I added the following direc
HI
I have a small query !! I need to write a script whenever there is an
error generated in the spamd.log or any general log file to send me a
mail only once, the bellow script is what i came u with but i doubt it
would work.
if [ $(grep -e "unable to start service" /var/log/spamd.log) = 1 ] ;
On 3/4/08, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agnello George wrote:
> > HI
> >
> > I have a small query !! I need to write a script whenever there is an
> > error generated in the spamd.log or any general log file to send me a
> > mail only once, the
Hi
I have a spamassissin server with 512 MB ram cpu speed 1796.635 MHz . i am
currently connecting a mailserver called "Smater mail " to connect to my
remote spamassissin server and it works fine. but suddenly ( after a few
days ) its connection breaks. When I check the log i find the
following
>
> > >
> > > Your inputs will be of great help
> > >
> > Might I suggest swatch? Why create your own script, when someone's
> > already created a powerful tool to do this.
> >
> > http://swatch.sourceforge.net/
> >
> > There's lots of good articles on using it out there:
> >
> > http://www.linuxse
On 3/7/08, Eddy Beliveau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> You said
> "then i add a crontab to run for ever 10 min
>
> crontab -e
> 10 * * * * /your/location/of/script "
>
> Please note that your syntax said to execute once per hour at the 10th
> minute of the hour
>
> To execute at interva
I see in my log the following what does it mean ??
Fri Mar 7 21:07:12 2008 [11800] info: prefork: child states: BBB
Fri Mar 7 21:07:12 2008 [11800] info: prefork: server reached
--max-children setting, consider raising it
--
Regards
Agnello Dsouza
www.linux-vashi.blogspot.com
www.bible-s
HI
i am facing a problem from sending mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
my yahoo account , i receive the mail but it automatically come to my spam
folder in my yahoo account, this happen to all email ID in the yahoo domain.
Is there a work around on the mail server ( exim ) ( Linux box ).Bellow
is
On my spamassissin server i got the following error what is
actually went wrong here !!
Wed Mar 12 14:58:28 2008 [3130] error: syswrite() to parent failed: Broken
pipe at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/
Hi
I was just Reading the article from
http://www.comptechdoc.org/os/linux/howlinuxworks/linux_hlbootproc.html
in the article
before the system can boot the BIOS detect the first available IDE device,
on this device is the MBR which contain the boot loader and partition
tables
now suppose i have
On 3/20/08, Arvid Ephraim Picciani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> nice. spam on the spamassassin ml. anyone got a rule for those already? :D
>
> On Thursday 20 March 2008 11:13:09 agnello george wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I started your industry profile on Orglex b
how to unsubscribe to this group
--
Regards
Agnello Dsouza
www.linux-vashi.blogspot.com
www.bible-study-india.blogspot.com
Hello,
after a fresh SpamAssassin-3.1.3 install from sources the following
errors appear raddomly in log file:
@400044b2ce89145fc454 [354] error: Minute '60' out of range 0..59 at
/usr/local/spamassasin/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm
line 429
stderr 2>&1
==> /service/spamd/log/run <==
#!/bin/sh
exec setuidgid log multilog t /var/log/spamd
--
George Georgalis, systems architect, administrator <
http://galis.org/ cell:646-331-2027 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Plugin::URIDNSBL but maybe I need another plugin?
What's missing?
// George
--
George Georgalis, systems architect, administrator <
http://galis.org/ cell:646-331-2027 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 11:35:53AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
>George Georgalis wrote:
>> it would seem the following rule is not being used...
>>
>> header __RCVD_IN_SBL_XBLeval:check_rbl('sblxbl',
>> 'sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org.')
>> de
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 02:15:09PM -0400, Fred wrote:
>George Georgalis wrote:
>> Argument "REPORT" isn't numeric in
>> subroutine entry at /usr/share/perl/5.6.1/IO/Socket/INET.pm line 223,
>> line 58. 2005-09-07 13:49:11.026387500 Argument "REPORT" i
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 02:47:04PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
>Fred wrote:
>> George Georgalis wrote:
>>
>>>Argument "REPORT" isn't numeric in
>>>subroutine entry at /usr/share/perl/5.6.1/IO/Socket/INET.pm line 223,
>>> line 58. 2005-09-07
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 02:49:50PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
>George Georgalis wrote:
>> 2005-09-07 13:49:10.975816500 logmsg: checking message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> for geo:1002.
>> 2005-09-07 13:49:10.986551500 debug: received-header: parsed as [
&g
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 03:24:50PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
>George Georgalis wrote:
>
>> grep -r REPORT /etc/spamassassin/ /usr/share/spamassassin/
>> returned nothing that wasn't attached to other characters.
>
>Hmm.. what about greping /etc/resolv.conf?
nothing
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 03:45:56PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
>George Georgalis wrote:
>> In my setup, trusted relays arn't tested with SA, they go straight
>> to the queue. Untrusted networks must negociate SA in SMTP. I've
>> visited this configuration issue
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 05:31:13PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
>George Georgalis wrote:
>
>>
>> Well since my MTA doesn't have an IP put in the header (it gets
>> mail from stdin -- and SA runs from stdin forwarding the exit code
>> to the MTA which then accept
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 03:47:24PM -0400, George Georgalis wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 03:24:50PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
>>George Georgalis wrote:
>>
>>> grep -r REPORT /etc/spamassassin/ /usr/share/spamassassin/
>>> returned nothing that wasn't
ew days since I tried
to connect, but I've not been able to connect at all from
66.250.170.210.
How can I go about finding why I was blacklisted? It would be nice
to get an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on the occasion of being blacklisted
from this service.
// George
--
George Georgali
134.27
rulesemporium.com = 38.99.66.94
The rules seem at rulesemporium.com, but my scripts use www.rulesemporium.com
*sigh*
// George
--
George Georgalis, systems architect, administrator <
http://galis.org/ cell:646-331-2027 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: rulesemporium.com 28800 A 216.218.134.27
answer: www.rulesemporium.com 28800 A 216.218.134.27
if it is coming offline, um, well the other NS servers don't know that.
// George
--
George Georgalis, systems architect, administrator <
http://galis.org/ cell:646-331-2027 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
way we can assist in moving this forward?
BTW, the TestBed info is at www.vic6.net :-)
Cheers and best regards
George
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 22:30 -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> On 28/11/2008 10:11 PM, George Fong wrote:
> > I suspect I have missed something simple but when
--
George Fong
Lateral Plains Pty Ltd
Tel: +61 3 5335 2243
Just remember, wherever you go there you are.
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content
by MailScanner and is believed to be clean.
do sa-update --debug
it can't find spamassassin.apache.org for the updates. I am guessing
that this server only lives in Ipv4 Land?
If this is the case, is there an IPv6 repository that can be reached?
Thanks in advance
George
George Fong
Lateral Plains Pty Ltd
Tel: +61 3 5335 2243
Jus
Hi Daryl, thanks for the quick response
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 22:30 -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> On 28/11/2008 10:11 PM, George Fong wrote:
> > I suspect I have missed something simple but when I do sa-update --debug
> > it can't find spamassassin.apache.org for t
Looking at this block from above SpamAssassin.pm line 1469,
it's not clear to me how to avoid the warning/errors listed below.
note: I'm doing active (in smtp) filtering, and I do not want to
create a .spamassassin directory.
Ideas?
// George
sub get_and_create_userstate_dir {
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
