Julian Yap wrote:
>
> Yep.
>
> 2) Reinstall everything that depends on Perl:
> sudo portupgrade -C -fr perl
>
if you don't use -x perl will be reinstalled too, don't know if it
matters but once I did so (not using -x) I found lots of old files in
the perl dirs
>>> I have noticed that Per
when running sa-update in debug, always end up with this:
channel: current version is 895075, new version is 895075, skipping channel
Are there no updates, or am I misconfigured for rules updates?
Updates are not publishing because of a lack of corpora to test the rules
against. Sorry, known issue.
Regards,
KAM
joea wrote:
when running sa-update in debug, always end up with this:
channel: current version is 895075, new version is 895075, skipping channel
Are there no updates, or am I m
On 4/12/12 6:22 AM, "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote:
> Updates are not publishing because of a lack of corpora to test the rules
> against. Sorry, known issue.
Can you remind me how far below the threshold we are for corpora? If I hand
qualify another couple of thousand hams or so would that be signi
On 4/12/2012 3:17 AM, xTrade Assessory wrote:
>
> I'm still curious why you get over 20 sec scan times
>
> will you share your experience?
>
> I have several servers, and I find very few messages getting to 15
> seconds even on the most busiest machines, most are not going beyond 5,
> since numbers
Hello
Doesn't seem to be listed as a test in
http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_3_x.html
Buit the test is there in
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.003002/updates_spamassassin_org/20_body_tests.cf
--
Best regards,
Niamh mailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgp3V1I12zfoR.pgp
Descr
Started happening a month or so ago. Every now and then out of the blue
I'll get the following error:
spamd[61494]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /usr/local/spamd/bayes_*
R/W: lock failed: Interrupted system call
This causes scans to take 40-60 seconds to complete as they seem to wait
t
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Daniel McDonald wrote:
On 4/12/12 6:22 AM, "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote:
Updates are not publishing because of a lack of corpora to test the rules
against. Sorry, known issue.
Can you remind me how far below the threshold we are for corpora? If I hand
qualify another coup
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Andy Jezierski wrote:
Started happening a month or so ago. Every now and then out of the blue
I'll get the following error:
spamd[61494]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /usr/local/spamd/bayes_*
R/W: lock failed: Interrupted system call
This causes scans to take 40-60
On 04/12, John Hardin wrote:
> >Can you remind me how far below the threshold we are for corpora? If I hand
> >qualify another couple of thousand hams or so would that be significant? Or
> >is our deficit significantly larger than that?
> The current corpora are ham=50658, spam=245341.
>
> I don
>
>"SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update since 2012-02-25."
>
>From this, should I conclude there will be no updates to earlier versions
>(3.2.x for instance) ? Must I upgrade in order to update?
joe a.
On 04/12, joea wrote:
> >"SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update since 2012-02-25."
>
> From this, should I conclude there will be no updates to earlier versions
> (3.2.x for instance) ? Must I upgrade in order to update?
No, I thought it was overly verbose to say it actually say
On 04/12, John Hardin wrote:
The current corpora are ham=50658, spam=245341.
Duh. I got those reversed... :)
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507
Darxus, any chance you can add this information to the warning notice?
And I don't think it's obnoxious because once we get things working
again, it should be non-existent!
I'm cc'ing Warren again but perhaps someone has a phone number for
Warren so we can call him and see if he'll green ligh
On 4/12/2012 1:34 PM, joea wrote:
"SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update since 2012-02-25."
> From this, should I conclude there will be no updates to earlier versions
(3.2.x for instance) ? Must I upgrade in order to update?
Err, 3.3.0 was the first that included sa-update..
On 4/12/2012 10:38 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello
Doesn't seem to be listed as a test in
http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_3_x.html
Buit the test is there in
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.003002/updates_spamassassin_org/20_body_tests.cf
I don't believe that page has been updated since the in
>>> On 4/12/2012 at 4:30 PM, "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote:
> On 4/12/2012 1:34 PM, joea wrote:
>>> "SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update since 2012-02-25."
>>>
>> > From this, should I conclude there will be no updates to earlier versions
> (3.2.x for instance) ? Must I upgrade in o
I see where one can forward mail to location and have spamassassin scan them.
For both spam and ham I gather.
Wondering what settings to change to have it ignore any additional info the
forward adds. Yes, I am looking for a bit of spoon feeding here, as, well,
it's been along day.
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, joea wrote:
I see where one can forward mail to location and have spamassassin scan them.
For both spam and ham I gather.
Wondering what settings to change to have it ignore any additional info the
forward adds. Yes, I am looking for a bit of spoon feeding here, as, we
Having just un tar'd, a quick look at the .raw files tells me I had better ask
those who may know.
So, I'm asking. . . where can I find what to feed these fellows? And . . .
time to relax for a while.
Is there a known packaging for SUSE SLES10 ?
I am executing Spamassassin (version 3.2.5) through an Exim4 transport on a
Debian server. Everything in the routing process works fine and my
user_prefs file is consulted as required.
I am trying to mark all non-English emails as spam but the configuration
I've got in my user_prefs file doesn't
Hello haese,
Friday, April 13, 2012, 6:39:00 AM, you wrote:
h> The email in question was created and sent using Gmail with 'Default
h> transliteration language' set to Arabic. So, CHARSET_FARAWAY should have
h> been triggered (since ok_locales is set to en) but it doesn't seem like it
h> has.
D
Thank you for the reply.
I am not using TextCat so didn't load the plugin as you suggest. The
reason is that the following thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@spamassassin.apache.org/msg69225.html
leads me to believe that TextCat might not be suitable for my needs, since
(as quoted within t
23 matches
Mail list logo
