From: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> fyi, if you're using Fedora Core --
> http://blog.dave.org.uk/archives/000715.html
>
> totally unconfirmed, but worth noting in case that really is the
> case.
I gave up on the FC4 SpamAssassin load very early on. It was totally
Borked. I forced it out
From: "Kelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Justin Mason wrote:
> > fyi, if you're using Fedora Core --
> > http://blog.dave.org.uk/archives/000715.html
> >
> > totally unconfirmed, but worth noting in case that really is the
> > case.
>
> My copy of Fedora Core 4 has "required_hits 5" in local.cf usin
(Quoted in full for Warren, the Fedora contact.)
--On Tuesday, July 12, 2005 12:06 AM -0700 jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Justin Mason wrote:
> fyi, if you're using Fedora Core --
> http://blog.dave.org.uk/archives/000715.html
>
> totally unconfirmed, but worth noting in case that really is t
Reply from Warren:
Kenneth,
Thanks for alerting to me to this. I tried to post to the list, but it
appears to be extremely slow or down at the moment or something.
jdow wrote:
Justin Mason wrote:
fyi, if you're using Fedora Core --
http://blog.dave.org.uk/archives/000715.html
totally unco
jdow wrote:
Justin Mason wrote:
fyi, if you're using Fedora Core --
http://blog.dave.org.uk/archives/000715.html
totally unconfirmed, but worth noting in case that really is the case.
We have never shipped spamassassin with a changed default level. I have
absolutely no idea where this is
From: "Kenneth Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> (Quoted in full for Warren, the Fedora contact.)
>
> --On Tuesday, July 12, 2005 12:06 AM -0700 jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> >> Justin Mason wrote:
> >> > fyi, if you're using Fedora Core --
> >> > http://blog.dave.org.uk/archives/000715.html
> >
From: "Kenneth Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply from Warren:
>
> Kenneth,
> Thanks for alerting to me to this. I tried to post to the list, but it
> appears to be extremely slow or down at the moment or something.
>
> jdow wrote:
> >> Justin Mason wrote:
> >>
> >>> fyi, if you're using Fedora
"Steve Sobol" wrote:
> That's the way I'd do it. I'd much, MUCH rather install Perl modules via
> CPAN than have to go resolve RPM dependencies. If there's an RPM available
> that works with my distro, great! Otherwise...
..I have used YUM and the installation it's ok !!
thanks.
Salvat
From: "sasa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Steve Sobol" wrote:
>
> > That's the way I'd do it. I'd much, MUCH rather install Perl modules via
> > CPAN than have to go resolve RPM dependencies. If there's an RPM
available
> > that works with my distro, great! Otherwise...
>
> ..I have used YUM and the ins
Hi Bob
> One possibility: If you're doing sa-learn as one user, and qmail is
> invoking spamd to run as a different user, you may be training one
> Bayes database and spamd may be using a different database that isn't
> trained.
> Bob Menschel
I'm having some difficulty finding out exactly whic
Jdow wrote on Tue, 12 Jul 2005 02:09:30 -0700:
> I installed FC4 virgin. SpamAssassin 3.0.4 was installed. SPF checks did
> not function. Other checks failed as well
Well, could it be that it just doesn't enforce enough Perl dependencies?
Installing from the tarball could have had the same bad
Andrew Ott wrote on Mon, 11 Jul 2005 17:37:42 -0600:
> Also is there any way to see the count of spam and ham messages that are in
> the bayes database, I can't seem to find any info on that. I want to make
> sure there are a lot in there before I turn the bayes rules on.
sa-learn --dump magic
Is here an easy way to exclude domains from eval:check_rbl_sub checks ?
It appears that hotmail.com hits DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE Because of "political
reasons".
(Or at least reasons I don´t completely agree with)
See: http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=hotmail.com
Is there any way t
> -Original Message-
> From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 5:32 PM
> To: Carnegie, Martin
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Bypass URI check
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have received a few messages l
Hello,
I'm not sure if this belongs in the dev-list or not, but we have made
some minor changes to SA in order for us to allow our users to create
separate filters for mail that we consider to be "almost certainly"
spam, versus mail that is "probably" spam.
It should be noted that this code was o
Richard Duran wrote:
Hello,
I'm not sure if this belongs in the dev-list or not, but we have made
some minor changes to SA in order for us to allow our users to create
separate filters for mail that we consider to be "almost certainly"
spam, versus mail that is "probably" spam.
Just filter b
Michael Parker wrote:
Cami wrote:
SQL simply doesnt scale very well for bayes. We have a serverfarm of
12 spamassassin servers and storing bayes in SQL. We see on average
about 4000 queries per second. The MySQL server has been optimized
to hell and back and is running on high-end hardware,
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Joe Flowers wrote on Mon, 11 Jul 2005 12:09:29 -0400:
That's bad, really bad
detection ...
No. It's good, really good detection.
You should improve that instead of trying to find a
barrier which gives you the best FP:FN ratio.
I'm not trying to find the best F
Cami wrote:
> Well.. As for setup, we're using amavisd-new which provides more
> functionality than spamc/spamd (thus producing more sql queries).
> As for average scantime per msg, no idea since i dont log that.
> Hardware wise: Dell PowerEdge 2650, Dual 3.06GHz, 6gigs of ram,
> 5x32K RPM disks i
ay Lee wrote:
Richard Duran wrote:
Hello,
I'm not sure if this belongs in the dev-list or not, but we have made
some minor changes to SA in order for us to allow our users to create
separate filters for mail that we consider to be "almost certainly"
spam, versus mail that is "probably" spam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Parker writes:
> Cami wrote:
>
> > Well.. As for setup, we're using amavisd-new which provides more
> > functionality than spamc/spamd (thus producing more sql queries).
> > As for average scantime per msg, no idea since i dont log that.
> >
How to shut down the spamassassin? so it doesnt run
??
Justin Mason wrote:
> Is there any diff between Amavisd and spamd's use of SQL for bayes?
> I wouldn't have thought so...
No, just the fact that it doesn't generally support (someone feel free
to correct me if I'm wrong) individualized configs (ie everything runs
as a single user). Anyone who a
Tim Litwiller wrote:
this is the way I've been doing it in procmail - then I don't have to
count *'s
# ---
# Spamassassin - certainly spam
# ---
:0 H:
* ^X-Spam-Status: +(yes|no), +score=\/[^. ]*
* ? (( ${MA
Unplug
the power to the server.
If
that fails, I assume you would need to contact the person that set it up. You
sysadmin could allow all your email to come thru without being scanned.
I hope
that helps,
Thinking of you,
Tom
Cruise
-Original Message-From: Michael
[ma
jdow wrote:
Bugzilla is basically worthless. So if I can get an arrogant remark about
an annoyance with FC4 from one of the FC4 people responsible for that
annoyance I figure I can be excused for being far more interested in
making it work rather than filing bugzilla reports. (Searching Bugzilla
On 7/12/05, Jay Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just filter based on X-Spam-Level headers. If 8 is certainly spam then
> have your server side filter or client filter look for 8 *s, then look
> for 5 *s for probably spam. Very simple, no code changes needed.
>
> Jay
Thanks for the response, J
Mike Jackson wrote:
> On my personal server, I'm running SA 3.0.4 with the user prefs,
> Bayes, and AWL in a MySQL database (mostly because it would be
> "cooler" that way). On my employer's server, I'm running the same SA
> version, but with file-based DBs and user prefs. We're going to be
> roll
> From: Kai Schaetzl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Andrew Ott wrote on Mon, 11 Jul 2005 17:37:42 -0600:
>
> > Also is there any way to see the count of spam and ham
> messages that
> > are in the bayes database, I can't seem to find any info on
> that. I
> > want to make sure there are a lot
That might be a little overkill though it does the job
;-)
Stopping running things on *nix platforms is
generally done by killing them, along with their children. "man kill" will
teach you how. Programs that start when during boot usually have special scripts
to both start and stop them, y
My users can find the "14" and change it easier than counting *'s
and if I want to I can template the file and expand the correct score to
each user easier with a number than with a bunch of *'s
Jay Lee wrote:
Tim Litwiller wrote:
this is the way I've been doing it in procmail - then I don
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Duran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 12:14 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Distinguishing between mail that is "almost
> certainly" or "probably" spam
>
>
> On 7/12/05, Jay Lee <
Joe Flowers wrote on Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:55:36 -0400:
> >That's bad, really bad
> >detection ...
> >
> >
>
> No. It's good, really good detection.
Sorry, I don't want to be rude by repeating myself, but if your average spam
score is something like 6-something the *detection* *is* bad. M
On Jul 12, 2005, at 1:19 PM, Chris Santerre wrote:
Thinking of you,
Tom Cruise
You owe me for the can of soda I just sprayed on my desk. Good times...
-Original Message-
From: Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 12:48 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Steven Dickenson wrote:
On Jul 12, 2005, at 1:19 PM, Chris Santerre wrote:
Thinking of you,
Tom Cruise
You owe me for the can of soda I just sprayed on my desk. Good times...
How to shut down the spamassassin? so it doesnt run ??
What operating system are you running SA on? How is i
On Jul 12, 2005, at 2:47 PM, Jay Lee wrote:
I think you meant "Help me, help you!"
You had me at hello...
Wait, what list is this again? :)
Steven
---
Steven Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.mrchuckles.net
Look at /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin (at least on the Linux I am using ).
/etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin start <- starts it up manually
/etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin stop <-manually shuts it down
/etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin restart <- cycles it ( off then on again) to pick up changes to config
Pretty sure the FC4 issues with network services not functioning and
such are simply due to the RPM not enforcing the Perl Dependencies. I
presume it is packaged with the idea that the majority of end users will
in fact be rolling out their machine as a desktop, and not want to be
stuck with a
The whole thing is that yesterday i did sa-learn
spam with spam folder and today the server is runing very slowely now. Emails
from to local users take about 3 hours to deliver. I`m runing RH 9.2 with
postfix and spamassassin 3.0.4. I know i can kill processes but every time i try
to kill sp
I'd run "sa-learn --force-expire" and
see if that helps the speed a bit.
From: Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 12:24 PMTo: Sander Holthaus
- Orange XLCc: users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject: Re:
How to shut down
The whole thing is that yesterd
since i have installed this system not long time
ago. i did sa-learn --clear.Then i did sa-learn --sync
- Original Message -
From:
Bret Miller
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 3:44
PM
Subject: RE: How to shut down
I'd run "sa-l
and eveyrthing is working fast like before. What is
the best way to feed the bayes with spam considering that there is no mail kept
at the server? All users download their mail and thats it. The spamassassin
is marking spams over 5.0 but when it wants to autolearn it
says failed(I assume th
Michael,
For me, the
quickest way to get Bayes going is with auto_learn. (NOTE: you have to
have your other rules working pretty well for this to be effective.) I
use:
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam
0.0bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam
12.0bayes_auto_learn
RTFM
Doctor? Database Consultant? Er, you should know better, Robert. {o.o}
chkconfig spamassassin off
Do not remove the file from init.d, ever. Nor is it "safe" generally
speaking to remove the rcX.d/SMMspamassassin files. It's best to use
the proper configuration tools.
And - this particular advice
Title: What is WOMR?
I have a FP that hit on SARE_SPEC_FROM_WOMR and the description is "Email from address points to WOMR". I tried to find more information but the only thing I can find is a radio station in Cape Cod. With a score of 4.0, this station must be bad :) Anyone have more infor
service spamassassin stop
Get the name right. It really helps.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The whole thing is that yesterday i did sa-learn spam with spam folder and
today the server is runing very slowely now. Emails from to local users take
about 3 h
Title: What is WOMR?
That
was originally "Word of Mouth Research". Slippery operators who operate
under MANY aliases. "Share your experiences" etc... see: http://www.joewein.de/sw/spam-syex.htm
Pierre
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/12/2005
03:50:18 PM:
> I have a FP that hit on SARE_SPEC_FROM_WOMR and the description is
> "Email from address points to WOMR". I tried to find
more
> information but the only thing I can find is a radio station in Cape
> Cod. With a score of 4.0, this station
Title: Message
Ah I
see. The subject of the message is "SHARE User Events in Boston: Early
Registration Deadline July 15". Would the best thing to do
is whitelist these guys?
--Martin
Carnegie Systems
ManagementATCO I-TekPhone: 780.420.5068Pager
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/12/2005
04:28:33 PM:
> Ah I see. The subject of the message is "SHARE User Events
in
> Boston: Early Registration Deadline July 15". Would the
best thing
> to do is whitelist these guys?
It's not the subject, it's who the message is from.
share.org
Probably
On 7/10/2005 4:41 PM, Eric A. Hall wrote:
> On 7/10/2005 3:49 PM, Loren Wilton wrote:
>
>>However, if you want something like this, just off the top of my head:
>>
>>header __HAS_TOTo =~/\S/
>>body__HAS_BODY/\S/
>>metaEMPTY_MSG(!__HAS_TO && !__HAS_BODY)
>
> Good idea. rawbody
Hello,
I'm running Spamassassin 3.0.4 with MailScanner on a redhat 3.0 AS
server.
When I run:
spamassassin -p /etc/MailScanner/spam.assassin.prefs.conf --lint
I get this error:
Failed to run DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL SpamAssassin test, skipping:
(Can't call method "bgsend" on an undefined
Hello Mun,
Tuesday, July 12, 2005, 3:36:10 AM, you wrote:
>> One possibility: If you're doing sa-learn as one user, and qmail is
>> invoking spamd to run as a different user, you may be training one
>> Bayes database and spamd may be using a different database that isn't
>> trained.
MF> I'm havi
Andrew Ott wrote:
> For those of you running large sites ( we have about 12,000 users, with
> 210,000 messages a day) what do you have for a bayes_expiry_max_db_size?
Sorry, I'm not a large site, can't answer that.
> Also is there any way to see the count of spam and ham messages that are in
> t
Ben Hanson wrote:
Pretty sure the FC4 issues with network services not functioning and
such are simply due to the RPM not enforcing the Perl Dependencies. I
presume it is packaged with the idea that the majority of end users will
in fact be rolling out their machine as a desktop, and not want
From: "Warren Togami" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ben Hanson wrote:
> > Pretty sure the FC4 issues with network services not functioning and
> > such are simply due to the RPM not enforcing the Perl Dependencies. I
> > presume it is packaged with the idea that the majority of end users will
> > in fact
On Friday, July 8, 2005, 6:44:55 AM, Kris Deugau wrote:
> jj-ml wrote:
>> I've received once a day a spam from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> (fidbroker.com) Since it is a french company and i live in france, i
>> call them (the phone number is in the spam) and tell them to stop.
>> They told me they will do
58 matches
Mail list logo
