, and said "editor"
address is valid not only for denninger.net, but also for a couple
of other domains that I run a web property for on behalf of
someone else.
If someone spams that "editor" user Spamassassin will use its
built-in rules -- but it does /not /honor the Bayesian cla
, but
is in the aliases file to this account, and said "editor" address is
valid not only for denninger.net, but also for a couple of other
domains that I run a web property for on behalf of someone else.
If someone spams that "editor" user Spamassassin will use its
built-in r
, and said "editor" address is
valid not only for denninger.net, but also for a couple of other
domains that I run a web property for on behalf of someone else.
If someone spams that "editor" user Spamassassin will use its built-in
rules -- but it does /not /honor the Bayesian cla
not only for denninger.net, but also for a couple of other domains that
I run a web property for on behalf of someone else.
If someone spams that "editor" user Spamassassin will use its built-in
rules -- but it does /not /honor the Bayesian classifier training that
my account (&qu
I think you are missing that a particular newsletter is not
intrinsically ham or spam. It is ham if the user has subscribed, and
spam if they have not affirmatively subscribed.
I have seen the very same content arrive at my mailserver for 2 users.
For one it is ham and the other it is spam.
Ther
27;t there be enough?
Absolutely. But the Bayes classifier can't classify mail of types that
have been meticulously excluded from its training corpus.
Would I benefit from training known trustworthy newsletters such as
ham?
Yes. And train the spam ones as spam.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsu
> I can imagine the newsletter template is somewhat common, but does bayes
> have any ability to distinguish a junk newsletter from a legitimate
> newsletter?
How can bayes, if you also can't? My advice would be to mark eg everything from
mailchimp and than whitelist what you indeed agreed to re
On 10/16/24 04:05, Alex wrote:
Would I benefit from training known trustworthy newsletters such as ham?
Yes, you would.
ven't trained them.
I can imagine the newsletter template is somewhat common, but does bayes
have any ability to distinguish a junk newsletter from a legitimate
newsletter? I realize there's somewhat of an imbalance between hams and
spams, but shouldn't there be enough?
Would I b
W dniu 18.09.2024 o 16:29, Matus UHLAR - fantomas pisze:
On 18.09.24 16:19, natan wrote:
I was very disappointed with spamassassin 4.x because it started to
grow /var/lib/amavis/tmp/
amavis should clean this itself.
which amavis version do you have installed?
did you tune it anyhow?
amavisd-
On 2024-09-17 at 16:29:52 UTC-0400 (Tue, 17 Sep 2024 16:29:52 -0400)
Alex
is rumored to have said:
It is up to the user, ie you, what is and what is not spam.
Well, yes, and no.
Of course it's my own system and I can define these terms however I
wish.
I'm also familiar with the need to i
Alex writes:
> It's only these few types of messages that are very subjective and
> experience from the broader open source community would be appreciated.
>
> If it has a legitimate unsubscribe link, does that make it ham?
>
> What criteria do you use to determine "spamminess/haminess of EVERY
>
Jared Hall via users skrev den 2024-09-18 20:08:
On Deb-based distros, you can add this in /etc/amavis/conf.d/50-user
under the $max_servers parameter.
also remember its safe to use tmpfs for tmp dir in amavisd
no joke
On 9/18/2024 10:19 AM, natan wrote:
Hi
I was very disappointed with spamassassin 4.x because it started to
grow /var/lib/amavis/tmp/
With SA 3.4.X - on average 100MB and it deletes on the fly
With SA 4.X - on average 2-6GB and I had to do a quick fix:
59 23 * * * root find /var/lib/amavis/tmp/
natan skrev den 2024-09-18 16:36:
W dniu 18.09.2024 o 16:30, Reindl Harald (privat) pisze:
who reply here ? :)
don't blame SA when a blind man can see that your problem is on the
Amavis side - why do one need Amavis tu begin with when there is SA
and spamass-milter
yes yes everyone know
W dniu 18.09.2024 o 16:30, Reindl Harald (privat) pisze:
Am 18.09.24 um 16:19 schrieb natan:
Hi
I was very disappointed with spamassassin 4.x because it started to
grow /var/lib/amavis/tmp/
With SA 3.4.X - on average 100MB and it deletes on the fly
With SA 4.X - on average 2-6GB and I had t
On 18.09.24 16:19, natan wrote:
I was very disappointed with spamassassin 4.x because it started to
grow /var/lib/amavis/tmp/
amavis should clean this itself.
which amavis version do you have installed?
did you tune it anyhow?
Did you enable and configure extracttext plugin?
Because that one m
Hi
I was very disappointed with spamassassin 4.x because it started to grow
/var/lib/amavis/tmp/
With SA 3.4.X - on average 100MB and it deletes on the fly
With SA 4.X - on average 2-6GB and I had to do a quick fix:
59 23 * * * root find /var/lib/amavis/tmp/ -mtime +0 -delete;
W dniu 18.09.202
On 18.09.24 13:42, Grega via users wrote:
Right now in SA 4.0.1 bayes at least for me is really challenging to train and
set up.
I had good trained DB from past V3 install, and it behaved really odd.
I trained it on new set of mails 3000 spam and 3000 ham (HAND PICKED mail it
was PAIN) and I
on training bayes?
It is up to the user, ie you, what is and what is not spam.
Well, yes, and no.
Of course it's my own system and I can define these terms however I wish. I'm
also familiar with the need to investigate every message - perhaps I should
have made that clear initially.
>
>
> It is up to the user, ie you, what is and what is not spam.
>
Well, yes, and no.
Of course it's my own system and I can define these terms however I wish.
I'm also familiar with the need to investigate every message - perhaps I
should have made that clear initially.
It's only these few typ
Jared Hall via users skrev den 2024-09-17 08:15:
On 9/16/2024 8:48 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
Now that I'm using SA4, and my bayes database is quite old, I'd like
to retrain it with new ham and spam. I hoped someone had some pointers
on some of the gray area and what you consider to be spam and ham.
On 9/16/2024 8:48 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
Now that I'm using SA4, and my bayes database is quite old, I'd like
to retrain it with new ham and spam. I hoped someone had some pointers
on some of the gray area and what you consider to be spam and ham.
Are reliable newsletters, like those from, sa
Hi,
Now that I'm using SA4, and my bayes database is quite old, I'd like to
retrain it with new ham and spam. I hoped someone had some pointers on some
of the gray area and what you consider to be spam and ham.
Are reliable newsletters, like those from, say, a trusted news source where
the user op
RW wrote:
On Tue, 09 Mar 2021 08:52:28 -0500
Steve Dondley wrote:
I will also be allowing users to flag their own spam using the
roundcube webmail client.
If you do that you should review the submissions.
This. SO much this. ALL THE THIS.
If you're using the "Mark as Junk" or "Mark as Jun
a specific user?
I was really thinking more of an individual running SA for their
own mail. It would be unusual for an admin to keep a full archive of
trained mail for each account.
Per user Bayes can be more accurate, but only if users take the
training seriously.
> I will also be allowing
On 9 Mar 2021, at 7:49, Steve Dondley wrote:
I've read through
https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/sa-learn.html which
states that "anything over about 5000 messages does not improve
accuracy significantly in our tests."
Did you read the section on expiration?
https://spamassassi
On 2021-03-09 08:28 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
Steve Dondley writes:
I've read through
https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/sa-learn.html which
states that "anything over about 5000 messages does not improve
accuracy significantly in our tests."
I would take that with a grain of salt.
On Tue, 09 Mar 2021 07:49:38 -0500
Steve Dondley wrote:
> I've read through
> https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/sa-learn.html which
> states that "anything over about 5000 messages does not improve
> accuracy significantly in our tests."
>
> So once I hit 5,000, what do? Do I run -
Steve Dondley writes:
> I've read through
> https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/sa-learn.html which
> states that "anything over about 5000 messages does not improve
> accuracy significantly in our tests."
I would take that with a grain of salt. Based on my experience running
SA fo
I've read through
https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/sa-learn.html which
states that "anything over about 5000 messages does not improve accuracy
significantly in our tests."
So once I hit 5,000, what do? Do I run --forget on say the 500 oldest
emails, delete those from my ham/spa
David B Funk schrieb am 10.05.2018 um 20:23:
On Thu, 10 May 2018, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2018, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
On 09/05/18 20:43, David Jones wrote:
On 05/09/2018 01:29 PM, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
On 09/05/18 16:37, Reindl Harald wrote:
quoting URIBL_BLOCKED is a joke
On Thu, 10 May 2018, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2018, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
On 09/05/18 20:43, David Jones wrote:
On 05/09/2018 01:29 PM, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
On 09/05/18 16:37, Reindl Harald wrote:
quoting URIBL_BLOCKED is a joke - setup a *recursion* *non-forwarding*
namese
On Thu, 10 May 2018, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
On 09/05/18 20:43, David Jones wrote:
On 05/09/2018 01:29 PM, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
On 09/05/18 16:37, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.05.2018 um 16:28 schrieb Matthew Broadhead:
it looks like it is working. so maybe it is just not flagging or mo
On 10.05.18 15:23, David Jones wrote:
On 05/10/2018 07:12 AM, Reio Remma wrote:
On 10.05.18 15:08, David Jones wrote:
On 05/10/2018 07:02 AM, Reio Remma wrote:
On a slightly related note. We're running a PFSense firewall with
DNS Forwarder (dnsmasq) in front of our mail server. From what I've
On 05/10/2018 07:12 AM, Reio Remma wrote:
On 10.05.18 15:08, David Jones wrote:
On 05/10/2018 07:02 AM, Reio Remma wrote:
On 10.05.18 14:58, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Am 09.05.2018 um 16:28 schrieb Matthew Broadhead:
i guess my dns is set to use my isp's dns server. do i need to
set up d
Am 09.05.2018 um 16:28 schrieb Matthew Broadhead:
i guess my dns is set to use my isp's dns server. do i need
to set up dns relay on my machine so it comes from my ip?
there is no way we send more than 500k emails from our domain
so i should qualify for the free lookup?
On 09/05/18 20:43,
On 10.05.18 15:08, David Jones wrote:
On 05/10/2018 07:02 AM, Reio Remma wrote:
On 10.05.18 14:58, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Am 09.05.2018 um 16:28 schrieb Matthew Broadhead:
i guess my dns is set to use my isp's dns server. do i need to
set up dns relay on my machine so it comes from my
On 05/10/2018 07:02 AM, Reio Remma wrote:
On 10.05.18 14:58, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Am 09.05.2018 um 16:28 schrieb Matthew Broadhead:
i guess my dns is set to use my isp's dns server. do i need to set
up dns relay on my machine so it comes from my ip?
there is no way we send more than
On 10.05.18 14:58, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Am 09.05.2018 um 16:28 schrieb Matthew Broadhead:
i guess my dns is set to use my isp's dns server. do i need to set
up dns relay on my machine so it comes from my ip?
there is no way we send more than 500k emails from our domain so i
should q
Am 09.05.2018 um 16:28 schrieb Matthew Broadhead:
i guess my dns is set to use my isp's dns server. do i need to
set up dns relay on my machine so it comes from my ip?
there is no way we send more than 500k emails from our domain so
i should qualify for the free lookup?
On 09/05/18 20:43,
On 09/05/18 20:43, David Jones wrote:
On 05/09/2018 01:29 PM, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
On 09/05/18 16:37, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.05.2018 um 16:28 schrieb Matthew Broadhead:
it looks like it is working. so maybe it is just not flagging or
moving
the spam?
in a differnt post you showed t
On 05/09/2018 01:29 PM, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
On 09/05/18 16:37, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.05.2018 um 16:28 schrieb Matthew Broadhead:
it looks like it is working. so maybe it is just not flagging or moving
the spam?
in a differnt post you showed this status header which *clearly* shows
On 09/05/18 16:37, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.05.2018 um 16:28 schrieb Matthew Broadhead:
it looks like it is working. so maybe it is just not flagging or moving
the spam?
in a differnt post you showed this status header which *clearly* shows
bayes is working - bayes alone don't flag, the tot
On 09/05/18 16:37, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.05.2018 um 16:28 schrieb Matthew Broadhead:
it looks like it is working. so maybe it is just not flagging or moving
the spam?
in a differnt post you showed this status header which *clearly* shows
bayes is working - bayes alone don't flag, the tot
On Wed, 9 May 2018, Reio Remma wrote:
On 9 May 2018, at 18:33, John Hardin wrote:
Also:
On Wed, 9 May 2018, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
your message has
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.15 tagged_above=-999 required=6.2
Setting the threshold higher will result in more spam getting through. The
> On 9 May 2018, at 18:33, John Hardin wrote:
>
> Also:
>
>> On Wed, 9 May 2018, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
>>
>> your message has
>>
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.15 tagged_above=-999 required=6.2
>
> Setting the threshold higher will result in more spam getting through. The
> scores calc
Also:
On Wed, 9 May 2018, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
your message has
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.15 tagged_above=-999 required=6.2
Setting the threshold higher will result in more spam getting through. The
scores calculated by the masscheck processes are based on the assumption
that the th
G!!!)
DNS server for the MTA's use so you avoid the URIBL_BLOCKED issue. That
will help quite a lot.
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
(4)
around 50 users. they are all working in same industry
OK, that's small enough that manual training should not be an issue.
Speculation:
A
On 09/05/18 16:03, Reio Remma wrote:
On 09.05.18 16:59, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
setting log_level and sa_debug in /etc/amavisd/amavisd.conf didn't
seem to make any difference. should i be doing it in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf?
See if $sa_debug=1 works (for full debug)? (and restart ama
On 09.05.18 16:59, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
setting log_level and sa_debug in /etc/amavisd/amavisd.conf didn't
seem to make any difference. should i be doing it in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf?
See if $sa_debug=1 works (for full debug)? (and restart amavisd).
Reio
ok now i am getting a lot
DBI:mysql:sa_bayes:localhost:3306
it is storing the info to the database ok. but it doesn't seem to
be filtering any mail.
(1) What is the output of: /usr/bin/sa-learn --dump magic
(2) What user are you running sa-learn as for training, and what
user is spamd running as?
(3) Ar
is storing the info to the database ok. but it doesn't seem to
be filtering any mail.
(1) What is the output of: /usr/bin/sa-learn --dump magic
(2) What user are you running sa-learn as for training, and what
user is spamd running as?
(3) Are you seeing any BAYES_nn rule hi
it doesn't seem to
be filtering any mail.
(1) What is the output of: /usr/bin/sa-learn --dump magic
(2) What user are you running sa-learn as for training, and what user
is spamd running as?
(3) Are you seeing any BAYES_nn rule hits on messages at all, on
either ham or spam?
Y
On 09/05/18 09:09, Reio Remma wrote:
On 09.05.18 9:57, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
BAYES_00=-1.9
I've personally set *bayes_sql_override_username = amavis* in my local.cf
If at all possible, run amavisd with SA bayes debug to see if/how it's
using the database.
Good luck,
Reio
Thanks Reio
On 09.05.18 9:57, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
BAYES_00=-1.9
I've personally set *bayes_sql_override_username = amavis* in my local.cf
If at all possible, run amavisd with SA bayes debug to see if/how it's
using the database.
Good luck,
Reio
27;t seem to be
filtering any mail.
(1) What is the output of: /usr/bin/sa-learn --dump magic
(2) What user are you running sa-learn as for training, and what user
is spamd running as?
(3) Are you seeing any BAYES_nn rule hits on messages at all, on
either ham or spam?
(4) Ho
. but it doesn't seem to be
filtering any mail.
(1) What is the output of: /usr/bin/sa-learn --dump magic
(2) What user are you running sa-learn as for training, and what user is
spamd running as?
(3) Are you seeing any BAYES_nn rule hits on messages at all, on either ham
or spam?
Y
g any mail.
(1) What is the output of: /usr/bin/sa-learn --dump magic
(2) What user are you running sa-learn as for training, and what user
is spamd running as?
(3) Are you seeing any BAYES_nn rule hits on messages at all, on
either ham or spam?
You'll probably need to look at yo
ut of: /usr/bin/sa-learn --dump magic
(2) What user are you running sa-learn as for training, and what user is
spamd running as?
(3) Are you seeing any BAYES_nn rule hits on messages at all, on either
ham or spam?
(4) How large is your environment (rough # and diversity of users)?
I'm no
system setup centos-release-7-4.1708.el7.centos.x86_64,
spamassassin-3.4.0-2.el7.x86_64, amavisd-new-2.11.0-3.el7.noarch
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:
required_hits 5
report_safe 0
rewrite_header Subject [SPAM]
use_bayes 1
bayes_auto_learn 1
bayes_auto_expire 1
# Store bayesian
For anyone interested, I largely resolved the performance issues with
sa-learn training when using txrep with a little mysql server tuning.
As a reference point, training with ~6400 messages (most of which had
already been learned) took about 14 minutes for both txrep+bayes, and
about 3.5 minutes
One thing pointing to maybe a need for reworking the training logic is
that I have txrep_track_messages at the default (1), and almost every
message in my corpus has already been trained; each run brings in only a
handful of new messages (usually 10-20, but often 0, and always < 100).
It s
Hello,
I have txrep data in a mysql database, and am working on a training
script to run sa-learn; with bayes also in MySQL and a corpus size of
5279 nspam and 849 nham, sa-learn takes a full 2 hours to run with txrep
enabled (use_txrep 1), but only 13 minutes with txrep disabled
(use_txrep 0
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 09:11:15 -0800
Daniel Ullfig wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I’ve installed spamassassin to work with hMailServer on a windows
> server. would like advice on training the filter, as I get a lot of
> false positives. Would like to be able to forward ham to some
nt to divide your users into two broad groups: those whose
judgement and responsibility you trust and who are allowed to train
without review, and the rest, where you review the messages for valid
classification before training.
So that would be *four* folders: two public folders exposed to your
On November 7, 2016 9:26:29 AM PST, Eric Abrahamsen
wrote:
>What a lot of people (including myself) do is have two IMAP folders
>learn/spam and learn/ham. When a message is incorrectly classified you
>put it in the right folder, then run sa-learn on a cron job, looking in
>the appropriate folder,
"Daniel Ullfig" writes:
> Hello:
>
> I’ve installed spamassassin to work with hMailServer on a windows
> server. would like advice on training the filter, as I get a lot of
> false positives. Would like to be able to forward ham to something
> like “h...@mydomain.
Hello:
I’ve installed spamassassin to work with hMailServer on a windows server. would
like advice on training the filter, as I get a lot of false positives. Would
like to be able to forward ham to something like “h...@mydomain.com”, and false
negatives to “s...@mydomain.com”. Can this be done
Am 02.10.2015 um 19:15 schrieb Andrew Davidson:
I'm not an expert on the mechanics of Bayes so I'm wondering how valuable it is
to continue training with collected spam that is properly tagged with BAYES_999.
Does that help to reinforce the logic or is it overly focusing the d
On 02.10.15 13:15, Andrew Davidson wrote:
I'm not an expert on the mechanics of Bayes so I'm wondering how
valuable it is to continue training with collected spam that is
properly tagged with BAYES_999.
Does that help to reinforce the logic or is it overly focusing the
database on ema
I'm not an expert on the mechanics of Bayes so I'm wondering how
valuable it is to continue training with collected spam that is
properly tagged with BAYES_999.
Does that help to reinforce the logic or is it overly focusing the
database on emails it can already detect? Should I only b
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:18:21 -0400
Roman Gelfand wrote:
> Does sa-learn need read write access to emails or read only will do?
Just read access.
> In case of false negative, should I use --forget option to retrain?
There's no need for that, it will work out what to do for itself.
Does sa-learn need read write access to emails or read only will do?
In case of false negative, should I use --forget option to retrain?
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Axb wrote:
> On 04/14/2015 04:44 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
>
>> I received an email which is based on score ham. I would lik
On 04/14/2015 04:44 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote:
I received an email which is based on score ham. I would like to train the
bayes db to consider this email as spam. Is it possible to retrain bayes
db for just that email without having that email available by providing
something like mail id.
you
I received an email which is based on score ham. I would like to train the
bayes db to consider this email as spam. Is it possible to retrain bayes
db for just that email without having that email available by providing
something like mail id.
Thanks in advance
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:22:31 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> in doubt the amout of trained ham and spam should be near 50%,
> >
> > This is myth. What's important is to have enough of each, the actual
> > ratio is not important.
>
> true - but you don't have much to measure the "enough of each"
Am 23.02.2015 um 00:11 schrieb RW:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 21:36:38 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
And I'd suggest the same for non-spam, train duplicative ham even
if it happens to be similarly addressed to different users. More
data is (nearly) always better for bayesian learning systems
of course
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 21:36:38 +0100
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> > And I'd suggest the same for non-spam, train duplicative ham even
> > if it happens to be similarly addressed to different users. More
> > data is (nearly) always better for bayesian learning systems
>
> of course
With the caveat th
Quoting Kevin Miller :
When a fresh spam flood comes in, sometimes 50 or more of my users
will get hit with the same message - just a different user in the
To: line. When one trains the bayes database, is there a
significant difference between training on all 50+ or just grabbing
a few
lto:da...@hireahit.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 11:30 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Quick question about training...
>
> On 2015-02-20 09:44, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > On 2/20/2015 12:35 PM, Kevin Miller wrote:
> >> When a fresh spam flood comes
bayes database, is there a significant
difference between training on all 50+ or just grabbing a few of the
messages and training on them? Will bayes be more convinced of the
spaminess of a particular message if it sees dozens rather than a
couple?
Yes, there will be a difference. Training the
difference between training on all 50+ or just grabbing a few of the
messages and training on them? Will bayes be more convinced of the
spaminess of a particular message if it sees dozens rather than a
couple?
Yes, there will be a difference. Training the exact same message
multiple times will not
On 2/20/2015 12:35 PM, Kevin Miller wrote:
When a fresh spam flood comes in, sometimes 50 or more of my users will get hit
with the same message - just a different user in the To: line. When one trains
the bayes database, is there a significant difference between training on all
50+ or just
Am 20.02.2015 um 18:35 schrieb Kevin Miller:
When a fresh spam flood comes in, sometimes 50 or more of my users will get hit
with the same message - just a different user in the To: line. When one trains
the bayes database, is there a significant difference between training on all
50+ or
When a fresh spam flood comes in, sometimes 50 or more of my users will get hit
with the same message - just a different user in the To: line. When one trains
the bayes database, is there a significant difference between training on all
50+ or just grabbing a few of the messages and training
On 18 Feb 2015, at 03:50 , Reindl Harald wrote:
> i would find it pervert using /var/spool for the userhome and bayes-database
I did not set the home for the spamd user, it was done in the install process.
And yes, I found the user or /var/spool/spamd odd as well.
--
Am 18.02.2015 um 11:41 schrieb @lbutlr:
On 18 Feb 2015, at 02:06 , Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 18.02.2015 um 05:50 schrieb @lbutlr:
On 17 Feb 2015, at 15:46 , Reindl Harald wrote:
because in a default milter-setup the one and only user is the user which SA
and the miler service are running as
> On 18 Feb 2015, at 02:06 , Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 18.02.2015 um 05:50 schrieb @lbutlr:
>> On 17 Feb 2015, at 15:46 , Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> because in a default milter-setup the one and only user is the user which
>>> SA and the miler service are running as, hence my script which n
Am 18.02.2015 um 05:50 schrieb @lbutlr:
On 17 Feb 2015, at 15:46 , Reindl Harald wrote:
because in a default milter-setup the one and only user is the user which SA
and the miler service are running as, hence my script which needs maybe small
adjustments for your environment (--no-sync and s
On 17 Feb 2015, at 15:46 , Reindl Harald wrote:
> because in a default milter-setup the one and only user is the user which SA
> and the miler service are running as, hence my script which needs maybe small
> adjustments for your environment (--no-sync and so on depend on the config,
> director
spamassassin
spamassassin has existing user-specific training already in place.
Spamass-milter isn’t using the user DBs.
additionally do my previous mail some technical facts how the milter works:
* postfix connects to the milter
* the milter connects to spamd via TCP
* spamd fires up if not present
spamassassin
spamassassin has existing user-specific training already in place.
Spamass-milter isn’t using the user DBs.
because in a default milter-setup the one and only user is the user
which SA and the miler service are running as, hence my script which
needs maybe small adjustments for your
sin has existing user-specific training already in place.
Spamass-milter isn’t using the user DBs.
--
Don't just *do* something: *sit* there!
On 17.02.15 08:13, LuKreme wrote:
OK, so I have spamass-milter running, but I need to train it. What is the
proper way to do this?
if you use "-u" parameter (maybe with "-x"), you should train it as the user
who receives the mail
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fanto
Am 17.02.2015 um 16:13 schrieb LuKreme:
> OK, so I have spamass-milter running, but I need to train it. What is the
> proper way to do this?
>
you dont train spamass-milter, you should train spamassassin
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/sa-learn.html
Best Regards
MfG Robert S
Am 17.02.2015 um 16:13 schrieb LuKreme:
OK, so I have spamass-milter running, but I need to train it. What is the
proper way to do this?
cat /var/lib/spamass-milter/training/learn.sh
#!/usr/bin/bash
# Home-Directory und Name des Milter-Users
SA_MILTER_HOME="/var/lib/spamass-m
OK, so I have spamass-milter running, but I need to train it. What is the
proper way to do this?
--
What beep from yonder speaker sounds?
Am 26.01.2015 um 17:17 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
On 26. jan. 2015 16.57.09 John Hardin wrote:
OK, but: why does Bayes saying "it looks as hammy as it looks spammy"
score so much when network tests are disabled?
dnswl is disabled, or missing training of ham, skip rbl check doe
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 26. jan. 2015 17.25.06 John Hardin wrote:
I don't quite understand what you're saying, can you unpack that a bit?
i have forgot now what the quesstion is and i belive you know what happends
if using skip rbl check is 1
I know why that scores
1 - 100 of 530 matches
Mail list logo
