email message, however with real spam
URL's
- which are listed with other URI RBL's - Spam Assassin is scoring on
those and not on the custom one.
Local configuration:
urirhssub URIBL_CUSTOM rbl.myrbl.tld. A 2
Note: I am not sure which of the following is correct but they
x27;s
- which are listed with other URI RBL's - Spam Assassin is scoring on
those and not on the custom one.
Local configuration:
urirhssub URIBL_CUSTOM rbl.myrbl.tld. A 2
Note: I am not sure which of the following is correct but they both work
and don't work as describe
I have deployed Spam Assassin between Postfix and Dovecot. It works
except for a weird problem.
I use a custom URI RBL in addition to the default ones. This works with
a test URL in the body of an email message, however with real spam URL's
- which are listed with other URI RBL
I have deployed Spam Assassin between Postfix and Dovecot. It works
except for a weird problem.
I use a custom URI RBL in addition to the default ones. This works with
a test URL in the body of an email message, however with real spam URL's
- which are listed with other URI RBL
Michael Hutchinson wrote:
Hi Everyone.
I need to implement some RBL's at the Spamassassin stage in our mail
server. We already have spamhaus setup on the firewall, amongst other
SMTP rejection lists. What RBL's are people using with Spamassassin to
tag email? As far as I can see, w
Hi Everyone.
I need to implement some RBL's at the Spamassassin stage in our mail
server. We already have spamhaus setup on the firewall, amongst other
SMTP rejection lists. What RBL's are people using with Spamassassin to
tag email? As far as I can see, we are only using URIBL and Spam
> Matt Kettler writes:
> BTW, there have been some reports recently that some versions
> of the Net::DNS module are nonfunctional, resulting in DNS
> checks being skipped
> in SpamAssassin. if you run "spamassassin -D -t < testmsg", it'll
> indicate whether "dns is available" -- if that says "
d to backup was to have my mailserver check three
> > rbl's ahead of spamassassin and simply throw out hits. the amount of
> > spam went way down and this caused me to realize that I was skipping rbl
> > checking without realizing it.
BTW, there have been some reports recen
Frank M. Cook wrote:
> the silver lining instead the problems I've been having is that I
> learned my rbl checking was screwed up. one of the things I did when my
> spamassassin started to backup was to have my mailserver check three
> rbl's ahead of spamassassin and simpl
the silver lining instead the problems I've been having is that I learned
my rbl checking was screwed up. one of the things I did when my
spamassassin started to backup was to have my mailserver check three rbl's ahead
of spamassassin and simply throw out hits. the amount of spa
On Wednesday, October 13, 2004, 12:39:24 PM, Jerry Jerry wrote:
> Does anyone have a good list of RBL's they use that blocks majority of the
> spam?
> Thanks
Kelson is right, please see the previous threads about this.
This subject's not entirely on topic either, at least fo
On Oct 13, 2004, at 12:39 PM, Jerry wrote:
Does anyone have a good list of RBL's they use that blocks majority of
the spam?
I happen to like the SBL and XBL. Both as SMTP blocks and as Spam
Assassin checks.
In SA, I tend to set all other RBL's to scores of 0 (to skip them), and
s
Jerry wrote:
> Does anyone have a good list of RBL's they use that blocks majority of
> the spam?
This comes up every few months (which is OK - spam changes, and so
various lists' effectiveness changes), but the most recent thread was
just two weeks ago. Check out the "Pr
Does anyone have a good list of RBL's they use that
blocks majority of the spam?
Thanks
14 matches
Mail list logo
