On 02/25/2015 10:03 PM, Dave Funk wrote:
It looks like you either have a permissions problem or a confusion
problem.
Your run of 'sa-learn --dump magic' is looking at some Bayes which has
enough ham/spam but what ever your spamassasin is looking at doesn't.
Your 'sudo' isn't running that sa-l
On February 26, 2015 3:36:02 AM John Hardin wrote:
> Feb 25 21:07:55.366 [27839] dbg: bayes: not available for scanning, only
0 ham(s) in bayes DB < 200
> Why does it say not enough ham?
Because you need to train ham *as well as* spam. How else will it be able
to tell the difference?
0 ham m
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, James wrote:
I don't think I have the Bayesian filter working.
This is some spam that wasn't marked as spam, shouldn't one of the tests be
BAYES_00?
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO,
FSL_MY_NAME_IS,HTML_MESSAGE,RDNS_DY
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, James wrote:
I don't think I have the Bayesian filter working.
You don't:
Feb 25 21:07:55.366 [27839] dbg: bayes: not available for scanning, only 0 ham(s)
in bayes DB < 200
Why does it say not enough ham?
Because you need to train ham *as well as* spam. How else wil
I don't think I have the Bayesian filter working.
This is some spam that wasn't marked as spam, shouldn't one of the tests be
BAYES_00?
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO,
FSL_MY_NAME_IS,HTML_MESSAGE,RDNS_DYNAMIC,T_OBFU_JPG_ATTACH autolearn=no
