On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, James wrote:
I don't think I have the Bayesian filter working.
This is some spam that wasn't marked as spam, shouldn't one of the tests be
BAYES_00?
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO,
FSL_MY_NAME_IS,HTML_MESSAGE,RDNS_DYNAMIC,T_OBFU_JPG_ATTACH autolearn=no
version=3.3.2
$ sudo sa-learn --username=debian-spamd --dump magic
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 5902 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 4985 0 non-token data: nham
0.000 0 422427 0 non-token data: ntokens
0.000 0 1159486049 0 non-token data: oldest atime
0.000 0 1424827990 0 non-token data: newest atime
0.000 0 1424843976 0 non-token data: last journal sync atime
0.000 0 1424830068 0 non-token data: last expiry atime
0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last expire atime delta
0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last expire reduction
count
Doesn't that show I have 5902 spam and 2462 ham messages?
/etc/spamassassin/local.cf
use_bayes 1
bayes_auto_learn 1
$ sudo -u debian-spamd spamassassin -D --lint 2>t
$ less t
$ grep bayes t
Feb 25 21:07:47.606 [27839] dbg: config: fixed relative path:
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.003002/updates_spamassassin_org/23_bayes.cf
Feb 25 21:07:47.607 [27839] dbg: config: using
"/var/lib/spamassassin/3.003002/updates_spamassassin_org/23_bayes.cf" for
included file
Feb 25 21:07:47.607 [27839] dbg: config: read file
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.003002/updates_spamassassin_org/23_bayes.cf
Feb 25 21:07:55.270 [27839] dbg: bayes: learner_new
self=Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Bayes=HASH(0x1de4868),
bayes_store_module=Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::DBM
Feb 25 21:07:55.353 [27839] dbg: bayes: learner_new: got
store=Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::DBM=HASH(0x230eb58)
Feb 25 21:07:55.356 [27839] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O
/var/lib/spamassassin/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
Feb 25 21:07:55.359 [27839] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O
/var/lib/spamassassin/.spamassassin/bayes_seen
Feb 25 21:07:55.363 [27839] dbg: bayes: found bayes db version 3
Feb 25 21:07:55.365 [27839] dbg: bayes: DB journal sync: last sync: 0
Feb 25 21:07:55.366 [27839] dbg: bayes: not available for scanning, only 0 ham(s)
in bayes DB < 200
Feb 25 21:07:55.367 [27839] dbg: bayes: untie-ing
Feb 25 21:07:55.379 [27839] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O
/var/lib/spamassassin/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
Feb 25 21:07:55.382 [27839] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O
/var/lib/spamassassin/.spamassassin/bayes_seen
Feb 25 21:07:55.385 [27839] dbg: bayes: found bayes db version 3
Feb 25 21:07:55.386 [27839] dbg: bayes: DB journal sync: last sync: 0
Feb 25 21:07:55.388 [27839] dbg: bayes: not available for scanning, only 0 ham(s)
in bayes DB < 200
Feb 25 21:07:55.388 [27839] dbg: bayes: untie-ing
Why does it say not enough ham?
It looks like you either have a permissions problem or a confusion problem.
Your run of 'sa-learn --dump magic' is looking at some Bayes which has
enough ham/spam but what ever your spamassasin is looking at doesn't.
Your 'sudo' isn't running that sa-learn --dump magic as UID 'debian-spamd'
It's running it as root but telling sa-learn to emulate user 'debian-spamd'
so there could be a permissions problem.
Try running sa-learn in the same way that you're running spamassasin:
$ sudo -u debian-spamd sa-learn --dump magic
and see what you get.
Other possibility is that sa-learn is looking at a different bayes
database. Try running that "sa-learn --dump magic" with the "-D" option
to see what bayes database it's looking at.
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
<dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.edu> College of Engineering
319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center
Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin Iowa City, IA 52242-1527
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{
