On February 26, 2015 3:36:02 AM John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> wrote:
> Feb 25 21:07:55.366 [27839] dbg: bayes: not available for scanning, only 0 ham(s) in bayes DB < 200> Why does it say not enough ham? Because you need to train ham *as well as* spam. How else will it be able to tell the difference?
0 ham means that all bayes digest is nearly spam, no ?but yes its no safetynet for its is, thats why learning ham is good, best source of learning ham is the spam one self sent :)