On 03/25/2011 04:59 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Are there REALLY that MANY massmailers that can not post
> valid URL's? Something is rotten in the state od Denmark...
Yes. Here is an example of ham in this category (obfuscated from an
opt-in newsletter I received a few days ago):
> .. yo
> On 23/03/2011 4:36 PM, Adam Katz wrote:
>> That would require an ENORMOUS whitelist and very close attention to its
>> upkeep. I do not see this as practical without using a URIBL-style
>> mechanism (which would also require high maintenance).
>> Even with such a
>> mechanism in place, it undul
> >> On 03/21/2011 09:37 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > Does anyone successfully use plugin or at least rules that
> > catch fake URLs?
> On 03/23/2011 11:43 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > I know about the problem with "legal" mail and spoofed URL's. That's
> > why I asked ab
On 23/03/2011 4:36 PM, Adam Katz wrote:
On 03/23/2011 11:43 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 03/21/2011 09:37 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Does anyone successfully use plugin or at least rules that
catch fake URLs?
On 21.03.11 13:36, Adam Katz wrote:
__SPOOFED_URL, a rule already shi
On 03/23/2011 11:43 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> On 03/21/2011 09:37 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Does anyone successfully use plugin or at least rules that
> catch fake URLs?
> On 21.03.11 13:36, Adam Katz wrote:
>> __SPOOFED_URL, a rule already shipping with SA, does this.
On 3/23/11 2:50 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 3/23/11 2:43 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I know about the problem with "legal" mail and spoofed URL's. That's why I
asked about plugin that would be able to accept whitelists.
I don't see if it's possible to combine this with matching s
> On 3/23/11 2:43 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> I know about the problem with "legal" mail and spoofed URL's. That's why I
>> asked about plugin that would be able to accept whitelists.
>>
>> I don't see if it's possible to combine this with matching some domains
>> while not matching others
On 3/23/11 2:43 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I know about the problem with "legal" mail and spoofed URL's. That's why I
asked about plugin that would be able to accept whitelists.
I don't see if it's possible to combine this with matching some domains
while not matching others, e.g. allow
> On 03/21/2011 09:37 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >>> Does anyone successfully use plugin or at least rules that catch
> >>> fake URLs?
>
> > I mean URLs pointing to different address than they appear, like:
> >
> > http://webmail.example.com/
On 21.03.11 13:36, Adam Katz wrote:
> No plu
On 03/21/2011 09:37 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>> Does anyone successfully use plugin or at least rules that catch
>>> fake URLs?
> I mean URLs pointing to different address than they appear, like:
>
> http://webmail.example.com/
No plugin needed. __SPOOFED_URL, a rule already shipping
On 3/21/11 12:57 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I use clamav, it somehow doesn't catch them all.
as I have already said, many banks send URL's that do not match, so this is
not possible to implement genreally (Yes, I know it sucks).
with clamav, you can set up a whitelist.
do a 'clamconf'
Does anyone successfully use plugin or at least rules that catch fake
URLs?
On 3/21/11 12:37 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I mean URLs pointing to different address than they appear, like:
http://webmail.example.com/
On 21.03.11 12:41, Michael Scheidell wrote:
CLAMAV.
I use clamav, i
>>> On 2011/03/21 12:18 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Does anyone successfully use plugin or at least rules that catch fake
URLs?
> On 3/21/11 12:37 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> I mean URLs pointing to different address than they appear, like:
>>
>> http://webmail.example.com
On 3/21/11 12:37 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 21.03.11 12:27, Jason Bertoch wrote:
On 2011/03/21 12:18 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Does anyone successfully use plugin or at least rules that catch fake URLs?
Fake URLs? Do you mean URL obfuscators/redirectors like bit . ly and
tin
On 21.03.11 12:27, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> On 2011/03/21 12:18 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> Does anyone successfully use plugin or at least rules that catch fake URLs?
>
> Fake URLs? Do you mean URL obfuscators/redirectors like bit . ly and
> tiny url . com?
Ah, no.
I mean URLs pointing
On 2011/03/21 12:18 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Does anyone successfully use plugin or at least rules that catch fake URLs?
Fake URLs? Do you mean URL obfuscators/redirectors like bit . ly and
tiny url . com? If so, I've had considerable success with Steve
Freegard's DecodeShortURLs p
Hello,
I know that this discussion took many place here in the past, but our
company is a victim of many phishing attacks so I would like to use any
possible solution.
My idea is that, while there are many many companies sending liegitimate
mail with fake URLs, but those could be whitelisted in a
17 matches
Mail list logo
