> >> On 03/21/2011 09:37 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >>>>> Does anyone successfully use plugin or at least rules that > >>>>> catch fake URLs?
> On 03/23/2011 11:43 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > I know about the problem with "legal" mail and spoofed URL's. That's > > why I asked about plugin that would be able to accept whitelists. On 23.03.11 12:06, Adam Katz wrote: > That would require an ENORMOUS whitelist and very close attention to its > upkeep. I do not see this as practical without using a URIBL-style > mechanism (which would also require high maintenance). Even with such a > mechanism in place, it unduly penalizes the little guys. Enormous? Are there REALLY that MANY massmailers that can not post valid URL's? Something is rotten in the state od Denmark... Note that the strength of the check can be still tuned, e.g. there's difference between <A HREF="https://example.com";>http://example.com</A> <A HREF="http://subdomain.example.com";>http://example.com</A> <A HREF="http://bulkmailer.example.net";>http://company.example.com</A> and between <A HREF="http://phishingpage.example.org";>http://vistim.example.com</A> However, I would be satisfied even with blacklisting of those invalid one's. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. On the other hand, you have different fingers.
