Re: excluding specific RBL checks

2023-01-09 Thread joe a
On 1/9/2023 3:55 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Until I can get around to updating I'm considering just nuking the actual tests from the ruleset. Much easier and reliable way: dns_query_restriction deny spamhaus.org Charles Sprickman skrev den 2023-01-09 08:04: Trying this on half the pai

Re: excluding specific RBL checks

2023-01-09 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Until I can get around to updating I'm considering just nuking the actual tests from the ruleset. Much easier and reliable way: dns_query_restriction deny spamhaus.org Charles Sprickman skrev den 2023-01-09 08:04: Trying this on half the pair, I assume this hits all subdomains of spamhaus.or

Re: excluding specific RBL checks

2023-01-09 Thread Benny Pedersen
Charles Sprickman skrev den 2023-01-09 08:04: Until I can get around to updating I'm considering just nuking the actual tests from the ruleset. Much easier and reliable way: dns_query_restriction deny spamhaus.org Trying this on half the pair, I assume this hits all subdomains of spamhaus.o

Re: excluding specific RBL checks

2023-01-08 Thread Charles Sprickman
> On Jan 8, 2023, at 10:35 PM, Henrik K wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 04:23:11PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote: >> What did you end up with? >> >> I have a bunch of zero rules for these yet still keep getting the >> "administrative notice" from sbl/zen. >> >> The fact that those guys

Re: excluding specific RBL checks

2023-01-08 Thread Charles Sprickman
> On Jan 8, 2023, at 10:44 PM, joe a wrote: > > On 1/8/2023 4:23 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote: >> What did you end up with? > > score RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS 0 > > I am not certain if that stops the test or simply reporting of the message. > Looks like I will need to do some packet captu

Re: excluding specific RBL checks

2023-01-08 Thread joe a
On 1/8/2023 10:35 PM, Henrik K wrote: On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 04:23:11PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote: . . . # remove spamhaus tests,. . . score RCVD_IN_SBL 0 score RCVD_IN_XBL 0 score RCVD_IN_PBL 0 score URIBL_SBL 0 score URIBL_CSS 0 score URIBL_SBL_A 0. . . Much easier and reliable way: d

Re: excluding specific RBL checks

2023-01-08 Thread joe a
On 1/8/2023 4:38 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: joe a skrev den 2023-01-08 21:50: SA version 3.4.5 Gears are clashing, clutch is slipping, among other things. Trying to exclude certain checks, via spamhouse services "by the book" what book ? The good one? Several places. Most looked like cut a

Re: excluding specific RBL checks

2023-01-08 Thread joe a
On 1/8/2023 4:23 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote: What did you end up with? score RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS 0 I am not certain if that stops the test or simply reporting of the message. Looks like I will need to do some packet capture after all. I have a bunch of zero rules for these yet st

Re: excluding specific RBL checks

2023-01-08 Thread joe a
On 1/8/2023 4:00 PM, joe a wrote: On 1/8/2023 3:50 PM, joe a wrote: SA version 3.4.5 Gears are clashing, clutch is slipping, among other things. Trying to exclude certain checks, via spamhouse services "by the book" When placing these values in local.cf: RCVD_IN_ZEN 0 RCVD_IN_XBL 0 RCVD_IN_P

Re: excluding specific RBL checks

2023-01-08 Thread Henrik K
On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 04:23:11PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote: > What did you end up with? > > I have a bunch of zero rules for these yet still keep getting the > "administrative notice" from sbl/zen. > > The fact that those guys don't just send out a "yes, this is on by default in > spamas

Re: excluding specific RBL checks

2023-01-08 Thread Benny Pedersen
Charles Sprickman skrev den 2023-01-08 22:23: What did you end up with? I have a bunch of zero rules for these yet still keep getting the "administrative notice" from sbl/zen. The fact that those guys don't just send out a "yes, this is on by default in spamassassin, here is copy pasta to turn

Re: excluding specific RBL checks

2023-01-08 Thread Benny Pedersen
joe a skrev den 2023-01-08 21:50: SA version 3.4.5 Gears are clashing, clutch is slipping, among other things. Trying to exclude certain checks, via spamhouse services "by the book" what book ? When placing these values in local.cf: RCVD_IN_ZEN 0 RCVD_IN_XBL 0 RCVD_IN_PBL 0 "spamassassin

Re: excluding specific RBL checks

2023-01-08 Thread Charles Sprickman
What did you end up with? I have a bunch of zero rules for these yet still keep getting the "administrative notice" from sbl/zen. The fact that those guys don't just send out a "yes, this is on by default in spamassassin, here is copy pasta to turn us off" email bugs me. I've grown to this hug

Re: excluding specific RBL checks

2023-01-08 Thread joe a
On 1/8/2023 3:50 PM, joe a wrote: SA version 3.4.5 Gears are clashing, clutch is slipping, among other things. Trying to exclude certain checks, via spamhouse services "by the book" When placing these values in local.cf: RCVD_IN_ZEN 0 RCVD_IN_XBL 0 RCVD_IN_PBL 0 "spamassassin --lint" complai

excluding specific RBL checks

2023-01-08 Thread joe a
SA version 3.4.5 Gears are clashing, clutch is slipping, among other things. Trying to exclude certain checks, via spamhouse services "by the book" When placing these values in local.cf: RCVD_IN_ZEN 0 RCVD_IN_XBL 0 RCVD_IN_PBL 0 "spamassassin --lint" complains. Yet SA starts without complaint