On 1/8/2023 4:23 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
What did you end up with?
score RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS 0
I am not certain if that stops the test or simply reporting of the
message. Looks like I will need to do some packet capture after all.
I have a bunch of zero rules for these yet still keep getting the "administrative
notice" from sbl/zen.
The fact that those guys don't just send out a "yes, this is on by default in
spamassassin, here is copy pasta to turn us off" email bugs me.
I've grown to this huge list and still get the warnings.
# remove spamhaus tests, they want us to pay
# need to include the first base rule or DNS still triggers but is ignored
score __RCVD_IN_ZEN 0
Is that a typo? There should be no underscore before RCVD, correct?
score RCVD_IN_SBL 0
score RCVD_IN_XBL 0
score RCVD_IN_PBL 0
score URIBL_SBL 0
score URIBL_CSS 0
score URIBL_SBL_A 0
score URIBL_CSS_A 0
score URIBL_DBL_SPAM 0
score URIBL_DBL_PHISH 0
score URIBL_DBL_MALWARE 0
score URIBL_DBL_BOTNETCC 0
score URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_SPAM 0
score URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_REDIR 0
score URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_PHISH 0
score URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_MALW 0
score URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_BOTCC 0
Until I can get around to updating I'm considering just nuking the actual tests
from the ruleset.
Charles
