> On Jan 8, 2023, at 10:44 PM, joe a <joea-li...@j4computers.com> wrote: > > On 1/8/2023 4:23 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote: >> What did you end up with? > > score RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS 0 > > I am not certain if that stops the test or simply reporting of the message. > Looks like I will need to do some packet capture after all. > >> I have a bunch of zero rules for these yet still keep getting the >> "administrative notice" from sbl/zen. >> The fact that those guys don't just send out a "yes, this is on by default >> in spamassassin, here is copy pasta to turn us off" email bugs me. >> I've grown to this huge list and still get the warnings. >> # remove spamhaus tests, they want us to pay >> # need to include the first base rule or DNS still triggers but is ignored >> score __RCVD_IN_ZEN 0 > > Is that a typo? There should be no underscore before RCVD, correct?
That's copypasta from the wiki page spamhaus references. No explanation on the page why the underscores... C > >> score RCVD_IN_SBL 0 >> score RCVD_IN_XBL 0 >> score RCVD_IN_PBL 0 >> score URIBL_SBL 0 >> score URIBL_CSS 0 >> score URIBL_SBL_A 0 >> score URIBL_CSS_A 0 >> score URIBL_DBL_SPAM 0 >> score URIBL_DBL_PHISH 0 >> score URIBL_DBL_MALWARE 0 >> score URIBL_DBL_BOTNETCC 0 >> score URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_SPAM 0 >> score URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_REDIR 0 >> score URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_PHISH 0 >> score URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_MALW 0 >> score URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_BOTCC 0 >> Until I can get around to updating I'm considering just nuking the actual >> tests from the ruleset. >> Charles
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
