On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 13:07:24 -0400
Alex wrote:
> https://pastebin.com/inS6qiiG
> ...
> Can someone also explain what NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED is? It appears to
> involve DKIM. This message appears to have been signed by gmail
> successfully.
The linked email didn't actually have NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED.
On 6/22/2017 7:38 PM, RW wrote:
Maybe Kevin or someone with knowledge of this could comment, as it
effectively eliminates the effectiveness of the __EMPTY_BODY and
__HAS_ANY_URI.
I have followed the thread a bit and agree it's likely a bug. Could you
please open something in bugzilla?
Regards
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017, RW wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 18:59:55 -0400
Alex wrote:
Maybe Kevin or someone with knowledge of this could comment, as it
effectively eliminates the effectiveness of the __EMPTY_BODY and
__HAS_ANY_URI.
It looks like there might need to be a separate URI store for that
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 18:59:55 -0400
Alex wrote:
> >> Maybe Kevin or someone with knowledge of this could comment, as it
> >> effectively eliminates the effectiveness of the __EMPTY_BODY and
> >> __HAS_ANY_URI.
> >
> > It looks like there might need to be a separate URI store for that,
> > which
Hi Kevin,
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 8:31 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2017, Alex wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Reindl Harald
>> wrote:
>>> Am 22.06.2017 um 01:55 schrieb Alex:
Can someone else confirm this? John was unable to reproduce it on his
system,
On Wed, 21 Jun 2017, Alex wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 22.06.2017 um 01:55 schrieb Alex:
Can someone else confirm this? John was unable to reproduce it on his
system, but I just installed the latest svn 3.4.2 branch and it's
doing it here. I'd apprec
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 22.06.2017 um 01:55 schrieb Alex:
>>
>> Can someone else confirm this? John was unable to reproduce it on his
>> system, but I just installed the latest svn 3.4.2 branch and it's
>> doing it here. I'd appreciate if someone could h
Hi,
This one wasn't blocked at the time it was received, but somehow is now.
https://pastebin.com/inS6qiiG
I noticed despite there being no actual URI that I can see in the
body, it still hits __BODY_URI_ONLY. Even if I remove the div tags it
still hits. Just wha
On Tue, 20 Jun 2017, Alex wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:40 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jun 2017, Alex wrote:
Hi,
We've been receiving empty messages (or what appear to be empty body
messages) delivered to undisclosed-recips and I wanted to figure out
how to block them.
This o
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:40 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2017, Alex wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We've been receiving empty messages (or what appear to be empty body
>> messages) delivered to undisclosed-recips and I wanted to figure out
>> how to block them.
>>
>> This one wasn't blocke
On Tue, 20 Jun 2017, Alex wrote:
Hi,
We've been receiving empty messages (or what appear to be empty body
messages) delivered to undisclosed-recips and I wanted to figure out
how to block them.
This one wasn't blocked at the time it was received, but somehow is now.
https://pastebin.com/inS6q
Hi,
We've been receiving empty messages (or what appear to be empty body
messages) delivered to undisclosed-recips and I wanted to figure out
how to block them.
This one wasn't blocked at the time it was received, but somehow is now.
https://pastebin.com/inS6qiiG
I noticed despite there being n
12 matches
Mail list logo
