On Fri, 23 Jun 2017, RW wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 18:59:55 -0400
Alex wrote:
Maybe Kevin or someone with knowledge of this could comment, as it
effectively eliminates the effectiveness of the __EMPTY_BODY and
__HAS_ANY_URI.
It looks like there might need to be a separate URI store for that,
which is not shared with genuine body URIs.
Do you have any thoughts on this? It appears the parse_dkim_uris in
your KAM.cf is effectively disabling the __EMPTY_BODY and
__HAS_ANY_URI rules because they match against the DKIM header.
There is a difference: gmail.com in the body becomes http://gmail.com in
the URI list. I checked and gmail.com in the DKIM header remains as
gmail.com.
Ah, that may be a way around it. I'll do some testing.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
*Your* lack of self-control does not give you
the authority to dictate limitations on *my* freedom.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
84 days since the first commercial re-flight of an orbital booster (SpaceX)
