On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 18:59:55 -0400 Alex wrote: > >> Maybe Kevin or someone with knowledge of this could comment, as it > >> effectively eliminates the effectiveness of the __EMPTY_BODY and > >> __HAS_ANY_URI. > > > > It looks like there might need to be a separate URI store for that, > > which is not shared with genuine body URIs. > > Do you have any thoughts on this? It appears the parse_dkim_uris in > your KAM.cf is effectively disabling the __EMPTY_BODY and > __HAS_ANY_URI rules because they match against the DKIM header.
There is a difference: gmail.com in the body becomes http://gmail.com in the URI list. I checked and gmail.com in the DKIM header remains as gmail.com.
