i will just report spamassassin trunc breaks amavisd-new

going back to 3.4.6 as now until 4.0.1 is released, in amavisd logs hits is always - with imho means spamtest is skipped, can you verify sa trunk does work still with amavisd ?

Re: Debian 8: Postfix -> amavisd-new -> spamassassin -> Bayes : not scanning?

On 10 Jul 2017 at 16:56, RW wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:48:29 +0200 > Frantisek Rysanek wrote: > > > Dear fellow Debian users, > > > > it seems that I've found the correct answer. > > > > In /etc/spamassassin/local.cf, > > in addition to the aforementioned: > > use_bayes 1 > > bayes_a

Re: Debian 8: Postfix -> amavisd-new -> spamassassin -> Bayes : not scanning?

already knew that Amavis was really a Perl script. The Perl interpreter probably gets called using the #! shell specification on the first line in /usr/sbin/amavisd-new . You betcha. >From there, the workaround is simple. But ... OOPS! I probably shouldn't tell anyone :-> Still... I don'

Re: Debian 8: Postfix -> amavisd-new -> spamassassin -> Bayes : not scanning?

On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:48:29 +0200 Frantisek Rysanek wrote: > Dear fellow Debian users, > > it seems that I've found the correct answer. > > In /etc/spamassassin/local.cf, > in addition to the aforementioned: > use_bayes 1 > bayes_auto_learn 1 > I have added: > > use_bayes_rules 1 > > F

Re: Debian 8: Postfix -> amavisd-new -> spamassassin -> Bayes : not scanning?

tc/amavis/conf.d/50-user , I have the following: > > $DO_SYSLOG = 0; > $LOGFILE = "/var/log/amavis.log"; > $sa_tag_level_deflt = -; # always add spam info headers > > $log_level = 1; > $sa_debug = 1; > > I've also tried log_level = 2, which showed me

Debian 8: Postfix -> amavisd-new -> spamassassin -> Bayes : not scanning?

's handled too. I'm getting *some* notes about the Bayes plugin in the amavis log: Jul 9 21:25:54 mail.x.y.z /usr/sbin/amavisd-new[8868]: (08868-01) SA dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O /var/lib/spamassassin/.spamassassin/bayes_toks Jul 9 21:25:54 mail.x.y.z /usr/sbin/amavisd-new[88

Re: Spamassassin and amavisd-new wont' check (faked) bounce with zip-archive/exe (maleware)

On Mon, 2015-10-26 at 13:09 +0100, Django[BOfH] wrote: > Hello list, dear Marc! > > I had have a "little problem" with a mailsystem. > > A few days agoe a colleague received over 200 bounce-messages and > this > over 10 minutes. O.K., that was all backscatter from a software > -company > in Redmo

Re: Spamassassin and amavisd-new wont' check (faked) bounce with zip-archive/exe (maleware)

On 26.10.15 13:09, Django [BOfH] wrote: Hello list, dear Marc! correction: Helo spamassassn-users list - it has nothing to do with attachment or virus scanning. you should have contacted amavisd-new list http://lists.amavis.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amavis-users So I tried to understand

Re: Spamassassin and amavisd-new wont' check (faked) bounce with zip-archive/exe (maleware)

On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Django [BOfH] wrote: A few days agoe a colleague received over 200 bounce-messages and this over 10 minutes. O.K., that was all backscatter from a software-company in Redmond :( All those messages had have an attachment (zip archive) with maleware. http://impsec.org/email-

Spamassassin and amavisd-new wont' check (faked) bounce with zip-archive/exe (maleware)

Hello list, dear Marc! I had have a "little problem" with a mailsystem. A few days agoe a colleague received over 200 bounce-messages and this over 10 minutes. O.K., that was all backscatter from a software-company in Redmond :( All those messages had have an attachment (zip archive) with malewar

Re: Fake amavisd-new header lines in recent spam

On 11/10/2014 09:01 AM, Rich Wales wrote: /do we have your permission to add this rule to SA's masscheck / autopromoting ?/ Yes, by all means, go ahead. Thanks, Commited to http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/emailed/sa_users_contrib.cf masscheck results w

Re: Fake amavisd-new header lines in recent spam

> /do we have your permission to add this rule to SA's masscheck / > autopromoting ?/ Yes, by all means, go ahead. -- *Rich Wales* ri...@richw.org

Re: Fake amavisd-new header lines in recent spam

o "from" clause*. A valid "Received:" line from an amavisd-new scan will always have a "from" clause -- and further, I believe a valid "from" clause from amavisd-new will always reference "localhost". * The "Received:"

Re: Fake amavisd-new header lines in recent spam

header lines, such as the following: * There is an *extraneous semicolon* before the "for" clause. There should be only one semicolon in a "Received:" line -- namely, the one just before the date/time stamp. * There is *no "from" clause*. A valid "Rece

RE: Fake amavisd-new header lines in recent spam

>Yeah they tried a similar trick with MailScanner years ago, basically dont >trust someone elses mail to tell the truth as per usual You are right about trust, but in this case we can detect fake amavis-headers and score bigtime in a safe way. And from what I can tell from my logs it hits

Re: Fake amavisd-new header lines in recent spam

Yeah they tried a similar trick with MailScanner years ago, basically dont trust someone elses mail to tell the truth as per usual On Sunday, 9 November 2014, Marieke Janssen wrote: > >hitting like crazy and safe > > Confirmed, thank you. > > /MJ > > -- -- Martin Hepworth, CISSP Oxford, UK

RE: Fake amavisd-new header lines in recent spam

>hitting like crazy and safe Confirmed, thank you. /MJ

Re: Fake amavisd-new header lines in recent spam

On 11/09/2014 06:59 PM, Axb wrote: On 11/09/2014 06:45 PM, Rich Wales wrote: Hi. Recently, I've noticed that some spam arriving on my mail server contains a "Received:" header line citing amavisd-new -- possibly an attempt to trick spam filters into concluding the message h

Re: Fake amavisd-new header lines in recent spam

On 11/09/2014 06:45 PM, Rich Wales wrote: Hi. Recently, I've noticed that some spam arriving on my mail server contains a "Received:" header line citing amavisd-new -- possibly an attempt to trick spam filters into concluding the message has already been scanned and is pre

Fake amavisd-new header lines in recent spam

Hi. Recently, I've noticed that some spam arriving on my mail server contains a "Received:" header line citing amavisd-new -- possibly an attempt to trick spam filters into concluding the message has already been scanned and is presumably free of problems. Here is an example

Re: AWL in SQL with amavisd-new

I got it all wrong: I was assuming that AWL works by using a tuple consisting of to/from (in the database: username/mail). Now thanks to your explanation I got it that the username is in fact only used for user-bound AWL. This means that I can simply use site-wide AWL. TxRep sounds quite promis

Re: AWL in SQL with amavisd-new

ML mail skrev den 2014-06-26 16:42: Ok so if I understand you correctly you are saying that it is possible to use AWL as site-wide having just one part of the e-mail exchange (the "To:" field) and this works fine/reliabily? incorrect question, incorrect answer :=) the username in awl is the un

Re: AWL in SQL with amavisd-new

Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2014-06-26 16:34: But the reason I'm posting is that many servers run sitewide AWL without issue. Why do you feel it is useless? multi recipient is handled better in amavisd-new, but its not very well dokumented, if you always just get single recipient spam

Re: AWL in SQL with amavisd-new

On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 07:42:50 -0700 ML mail wrote: > Ok so if I understand you correctly you are saying that it is > possible to use AWL as site-wide having just one part of the e-mail > exchange (the "To:" field) and this works fine/reliabily? To: isn't relevant, you either have site-wide or per

Re: AWL in SQL with amavisd-new

wrote: I am using the auto-whitelist feature of SpamAssassin stored into a PostgreSQL database. It works fine but I have got one issue: as I am calling SA from amavisd-new, the username stored in the AWL SQL table is always "amavis". Now this renders my AWL useless as the username sh

Re: AWL in SQL with amavisd-new

On 6/26/2014 10:31 AM, ML mail wrote: I am using the auto-whitelist feature of SpamAssassin stored into a PostgreSQL database. It works fine but I have got one issue: as I am calling SA from amavisd-new, the username stored in the AWL SQL table is always "amavis". Now this rend

AWL in SQL with amavisd-new

Hi, I am using the auto-whitelist feature of SpamAssassin stored into a PostgreSQL database. It works fine but I have got one issue: as I am calling SA from amavisd-new, the username stored in the AWL SQL table is always "amavis". Now this renders my AWL useless as the username shoul

Re: SpamAssassin with Amavisd-new

Timothy Murphy skrev den 2013-07-12 15:09: I have Postfix/Dovecot running on my CentOS-6.4 server, and I'm trying to add SpamAssassin through Amavisd. I have followed meticulously the instructions in . see "2. Installation" As far as I can tell, amavisd

Re: SpamAssassin with Amavisd-new

On 7/12/2013 9:09 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: I have Postfix/Dovecot running on my CentOS-6.4 server, and I'm trying to add SpamAssassin through Amavisd. I have followed meticulously the instructions in . As far as I can tell, amavisd and clamav are running, a

Re: SpamAssassin with Amavisd-new

please send logs to see what is happening BR DEJan On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > I have Postfix/Dovecot running on my CentOS-6.4 server, > and I'm trying to add SpamAssassin through Amavisd. > I have followed meticulously the instructions in >

Re: SpamAssassin with Amavisd-new

On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:09:10 +0200 Timothy Murphy wrote: > I have Postfix/Dovecot running on my CentOS-6.4 server, > and I'm trying to add SpamAssassin through Amavisd. > I have followed meticulously the instructions in > . > As far as I can tell, amavisd and

Re: SpamAssassin with Amavisd-new

On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 15:09 +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote: > I have Postfix/Dovecot running on my CentOS-6.4 server, > and I'm trying to add SpamAssassin through Amavisd. > I have followed meticulously the instructions in > . > As far as I can tell, amavisd and

SpamAssassin with Amavisd-new

I have Postfix/Dovecot running on my CentOS-6.4 server, and I'm trying to add SpamAssassin through Amavisd. I have followed meticulously the instructions in . As far as I can tell, amavisd and clamav are running, as also is spamd. I have set ok_languages

Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?)

On Mon, 3 Dec 2012 07:23:59 -0800 Gary Funck wrote: > Since this is a Spam Assassin list: Is there a way of disabling > grey listing, but still receiving some benefit from the principle > that mail received from a first time or infrequent sender should > be looked upon with some suspicion? Person

Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?

On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 07:27 -0800, Gary Funck wrote: > On 11/29/12 10:44:54, John Hardin wrote: > > You will probably want to put a little effort into maintaining lists > > of regular correspondents who can bypass greylisting. There may be > > tools to automate that, e.g. to whitelist someone a loc

Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?)

On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 07:23 -0800, Gary Funck wrote: > Since this is a Spam Assassin list: Is there a way of disabling > grey listing, but still receiving some benefit from the principle > that mail received from a first time or infrequent sender should > be looked upon with some suspicion? > Yes.

Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?

>> You will probably want to put a little effort into maintaining lists >> of regular correspondents who can bypass greylisting. There may be >> tools to automate that, e.g. to whitelist someone a local user has >> sent mail to. > > Has anyone looked into the use of a DNS-based white listing servic

Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?)

>> We greylist after the end of DATA. This wastes bandwidth, but lets us >> use the Subject: line as an additional mix in the greylisting tuple. >> This catches ratware that retries in the face of greylisting, but >> mutates the subject line with each retry. > We use grey listing on our low volum

Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?

On 11/29/12 10:44:54, John Hardin wrote: > You will probably want to put a little effort into maintaining lists > of regular correspondents who can bypass greylisting. There may be > tools to automate that, e.g. to whitelist someone a local user has > sent mail to. Has anyone looked into the use o

Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?)

On 11/29/12 14:46:25, David F. Skoll wrote: > We greylist after the end of DATA. This wastes bandwidth, but lets us > use the Subject: line as an additional mix in the greylisting tuple. > This catches ratware that retries in the face of greylisting, but > mutates the subject line with each retry.

Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?)

On 11/29/2012 18:54, David F. Skoll wrote: [My gut instinct says that a reasonable greylisting interval is too short for most DNSBLs to react. Pyzor/Razor/DCC may be somewhat more adept at reacting quickly.] Something trap-driven like NIX is a candidate. No, it's not safe enough to reject bas

Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?)

On 11/29/2012 17:37, John Levine wrote: Does greylisting increase chances of bulk detectors (razor/pyzor/dcc) in case of "yahoo like" spam sources? No. A remarkable fraction of ratware still doesn't bother to retry, so the most simple minded greylister will deter them. That's why it's useful.

Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?)

On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:01:38 -0800 (PST) John Hardin wrote: > It's not so much the host being blacklisted, as a checksum of the > spam being published by pyzor et. al., or for spamvertised websites > in the spam being published by URIBLs, so that when the sender tries > again the score for that m

Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?)

On Thu, 30 Nov 2012, John Levine wrote: Does greylisting increase chances of bulk detectors (razor/pyzor/dcc) in case of "yahoo like" spam sources? No. A remarkable fraction of ratware still doesn't bother to retry, so the most simple minded greylister will deter them. That's why it's useful

Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?)

>Does greylisting increase chances of bulk detectors (razor/pyzor/dcc) in >case of "yahoo like" spam sources? No. A remarkable fraction of ratware still doesn't bother to retry, so the most simple minded greylister will deter them. That's why it's useful. I've never seen any support for the the

Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?)

On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 22:47:45 +0100 Axb wrote: > boxes: About 50 000 > rcpt domains: About 2000 > rcpt users: Lots. I don't have an exact figure. > you guys are sending through greylisting. This is on our machines. Our larger customers have significantly higher numbers. Regards, David.

Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?)

On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, David F. Skoll wrote: On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:27:19 +0100 "Andrzej A. Filip" wrote: Do you treat "yahoo like" spam sources in the same way? With respect to greylisting, of course. If a machine passes greylisting once, it's extremely likely to pass it in future and it's

Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?)

Just wondering how many boxes: rcpt domains: rcpt users: you guys are sending through greylisting. Axb

Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?)

>> I've never had any >> complaints about delivery speed, but some senders have broken mail >> servers that don't retry on receiving a temporary failure. > > Many such servers use broken SMTP implementations that can't handle > a 4xx code in response to RCPT properly. > > We greylist after the end

Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?)

On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:59:45 +0100 "Andrzej A. Filip" wrote: > Does greylisting increase chances of bulk detectors (razor/pyzor/dcc) > in case of "yahoo like" spam sources? > [ based on your experience ] I suppose it might, but I don't use razor, pyzor, dcc or anything similar so I have no perso

Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?)

On 11/29/2012 09:53 PM, David F. Skoll wrote: > On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:27:19 +0100 > "Andrzej A. Filip" wrote: > >> Do you treat "yahoo like" spam sources in the same way? > With respect to greylisting, of course. If a machine passes greylisting once, > it's extremely likely to pass it in future

Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?)

On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:27:19 +0100 "Andrzej A. Filip" wrote: > Do you treat "yahoo like" spam sources in the same way? With respect to greylisting, of course. If a machine passes greylisting once, it's extremely likely to pass it in future and it's an utter waste of time to greylist it. Regard

Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?)

On 11/29/2012 09:31 PM, Dave Warren wrote: > On 11/29/2012 12:27, Andrzej A. Filip wrote: >> On 11/29/2012 08:46 PM, David F. Skoll wrote: >>> [...] >>> Also, once a given IP passes greylisting, we remember that and we don't >>> greylist that server for 40 days. If you have a large-enough user >>>

Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?)

Am 29.11.2012 20:46, schrieb David F. Skoll: > On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:36:45 -0500 > vec...@vectro.org wrote: > >> I've never had any >> complaints about delivery speed, but some senders have broken mail >> servers that don't retry on receiving a temporary failure. > > Many such servers use broken

Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?)

On 11/29/2012 12:27, Andrzej A. Filip wrote: On 11/29/2012 08:46 PM, David F. Skoll wrote: [...] Also, once a given IP passes greylisting, we remember that and we don't greylist that server for 40 days. If you have a large-enough user population, this can greatly mitigate the problems caused by

Re: Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?)

On 11/29/2012 08:46 PM, David F. Skoll wrote: > [...] > Also, once a given IP passes greylisting, we remember that and we don't > greylist that server for 40 days. If you have a large-enough user population, > this can greatly mitigate the problems caused by initial greylisting delays. Do you trea

Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?

On 11/29/2012 12:01, Ned Slider wrote: Indeed. But do also play around with the delays in postgrey (--delay). A minimal delay of 60 seconds is enough to force a retry and is adequate - legit hosts will retry, non-legit hosts won't so a longer delay is generally unnecessary. This is only one

Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?

I'll expand a little on John's comments below On 29/11/12 18:44, John Hardin wrote: On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Ed Flecko wrote: I'll be sure to check into Postgrey. Are there any special considerations to installing/configuring it or is it simply a matter of installing, reading the docs and configu

Greylisting (was Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?)

On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:36:45 -0500 vec...@vectro.org wrote: > I've never had any > complaints about delivery speed, but some senders have broken mail > servers that don't retry on receiving a temporary failure. Many such servers use broken SMTP implementations that can't handle a 4xx code in resp

Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?

> From: "John Hardin" > I fully agree. When I purchase an air-line ticket, I want the mail > immediately in my inbox. > > If the greylisting software replies a "4xx Please come back in 299 > seconds", > the truth is that you will have to wait an undetermined amount of time, > depending on the send

Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?

From: "John Hardin" Some users are extremely allergic to any delays in their email; you may have to maintain a list of exception destination addresses to keep them happy, or for addresses where no delay is acceptable, e.g. or I fully agree. When I purchase an air-line ticket, I want the

Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?

Good thoughts...thank you John. Ed

Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?

On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Ed Flecko wrote: I'll be sure to check into Postgrey. Are there any special considerations to installing/configuring it or is it simply a matter of installing, reading the docs and configuring? The biggest consideration is not technical, it's managing the expectations of

Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?

Am 29.11.2012 17:04, schrieb Ed Flecko: > Gentlemen, > Thank you for your feedback! > > I'll be sure to check into Postgrey. > > Are there any special considerations to installing/configuring it or > is it simply a matter of installing, reading the docs and configuring? > > Ed > yes dont do gr

Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?

Gentlemen, Thank you for your feedback! I'll be sure to check into Postgrey. Are there any special considerations to installing/configuring it or is it simply a matter of installing, reading the docs and configuring? Ed

Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?

Ed, > I'm looking to set up a spam filtering server to replace our ISP's > spam filtering service. > > I've seen this tutorial ( > ftp://orn.mpg.de/pub/unix/mail/Fairly-Secure_Anti-SPAM_Gateway_Using_SpamAssassin.html#antivirus > ) and I'd be very interested in YOUR opinion; do you think, > fundam

Re: "Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?

7;ll probably be using FreeBSD. Thank you for your input! :-) Ed I use Postfix with Amavisd-new which allows SpamAssassin and Clam-AV to be easily integrated. I also use Postgrey for greylisting. I find this setup very flexible and efficient. Clam-AV doesn't catch a huge amount on

"Fairly-Secure" Anti-SPAM Gateway Using OpenBSD, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC ? Can I get your opinion?

I'm looking to set up a spam filtering server to replace our ISP's spam filtering service. I've seen this tutorial ( ftp://orn.mpg.de/pub/unix/mail/Fairly-Secure_Anti-SPAM_Gateway_Using_SpamAssassin.html#antivirus ) and I'd be very interested in YOUR opinion; do you think, fundamentally, a server

Re: unable to switch Spamassasin module loading in amavisd-new

On tor 18 nov 2010 16:43:44 CET, "Sharma, Ashish" wrote I have a default installation of 'amavisd-new' and with it an old SpamAssassin installation version 3.2.5. default ? Now I have compiled Spamassassin version 3.3.1 from source and installed it at a custom location

unable to switch Spamassasin module loading in amavisd-new

Hi, I have a default installation of 'amavisd-new' and with it an old SpamAssassin installation version 3.2.5. Now I have compiled Spamassassin version 3.3.1 from source and installed it at a custom location. How can I load my compiled Spamassassin 3.3.1 to the original 'amavis

Re: spamassassin or spamd with amavisd-new?

On 06/01/10 03:49, Matt Kettler wrote: On 1/5/2010 6:09 AM, Angel L. Mateo wrote: Hello, Because FH_DATE_PAST_20XX bug, I have found that when I run spamassassin through amavisd-new (in a postfix server) I need to restart spamassassin and amavisd-new after any change in spamassassin

Re: spamassassin or spamd with amavisd-new?

On 01/06/2010 02:05 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: Terry Carmen wrote on Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:23:28 -0500: How/where is this turned on in amavisd-new-2.6.4? I'd be happy to get rid of useless instances of spamd This has nothing to do with amavis. spamd is a separate daemon that

Re: spamassassin or spamd with amavisd-new?

Terry Carmen wrote on Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:23:28 -0500: > How/where is this turned on in amavisd-new-2.6.4? > > I'd be happy to get rid of useless instances of spamd This has nothing to do with amavis. spamd is a separate daemon that *you* enabled. As you don't seem to know

Re: spamassassin or spamd with amavisd-new?

On 01/05/2010 09:49 PM, Matt Kettler wrote: . . . Really, all spamd does is create a reusable instance of a Mail::SpamAssassin perl object, and keeps it loaded so it can process several messages that spamc feeds this. This is exactly what amavisd-new is already doing internal to its own code

Re: spamassassin or spamd with amavisd-new?

On 1/5/2010 6:09 AM, Angel L. Mateo wrote: > Hello, > > Because FH_DATE_PAST_20XX bug, I have found that when I run > spamassassin through amavisd-new (in a postfix server) I need to > restart spamassassin and amavisd-new after any change in spamassassin. > > Debuggi

Re: spamassassin or spamd with amavisd-new?

On 5.1.2010 13:09, Angel L. Mateo wrote: Hello, Because FH_DATE_PAST_20XX bug, I have found that when I run spamassassin through amavisd-new (in a postfix server) I need to restart spamassassin and amavisd-new after any change in spamassassin. Debugging this, I found that amavisd-new doesn&#

spamassassin or spamd with amavisd-new?

Hello, Because FH_DATE_PAST_20XX bug, I have found that when I run spamassassin through amavisd-new (in a postfix server) I need to restart spamassassin and amavisd-new after any change in spamassassin. Debugging this, I found that amavisd-new doesn't connect to my spamd daemon to

Re: how to get amavisd-new to use spamassassin?

Mathias Homann wrote: Hi all, I have a postfix->amavisd-new->postfix->cyrus imapd through deliver chain up and running, and amavisd-new faithfully uses clamav to scan for viruses. I also have a working spamassassin / spamd with dcc and razor2 and all the toppings, on the same host,

how to get amavisd-new to use spamassassin?

Hi all, I have a postfix->amavisd-new->postfix->cyrus imapd through deliver chain up and running, and amavisd-new faithfully uses clamav to scan for viruses. I also have a working spamassassin / spamd with dcc and razor2 and all the toppings, on the same host, with sql-based settings

Re: Japanese characters/language blocked by spamassassing + amavisd-new

On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 01:59 +0700, Fuad NAHDI wrote: > > Train your Bayes, learn ham mail. Also, drop your AWL database and start > > fresh, since it currently maintains an average score of about 12 for > > that particular sender. > > > > Get rid of third party rules, if they don't apply to your pa

Re: Japanese characters/language blocked by spamassassing + amavisd-new

> Train your Bayes, learn ham mail. Also, drop your AWL database and start > fresh, since it currently maintains an average score of about 12 for > that particular sender. > > Get rid of third party rules, if they don't apply to your particular > mail stream. Seriously, reconsider *all* third party

Re: Japanese characters/language blocked by spamassassing + amavisd-new

On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 15:58 +0700, Fuad NAHDI wrote: > Hi all, > > I have postfix (ver 2.3.3) with mysql, virtual users, amavisd-new, clamav > and spamassassin (ver 3.2.5), dcc, pyzor and razor running on centos > 5.1. > Everything works fine but spamassassin + amavisd-new

Re: Japanese characters/language blocked by spamassassing + amavisd-new

t; Hi all, > > I have postfix (ver 2.3.3) with mysql, virtual users, amavisd-new, clamav > and spamassassin (ver 3.2.5), dcc, pyzor and razor running on centos > 5.1. > Everything works fine but spamassassin + amavisd-new frequently give a > high score for emails coming

Japanese characters/language blocked by spamassassing + amavisd-new

Hi all, I have postfix (ver 2.3.3) with mysql, virtual users, amavisd-new, clamav and spamassassin (ver 3.2.5), dcc, pyzor and razor running on centos 5.1. Everything works fine but spamassassin + amavisd-new frequently give a high score for emails coming from Japan (using Japanese character

Re: WrongMX from amavisd-new?

On Monday, Jul 28th 2008 at 12:03 -, quoth Mark Martinec: =>Dan, => =>> I installed WrongMX.pm today, on my secondary MX, but it does not appear =>> to be firing. A spamassassin -D --lint does show the module to be =>> loaded, and the module shows up in my amavisd-new

Re: WrongMX from amavisd-new?

Dan, > I installed WrongMX.pm today, on my secondary MX, but it does not appear > to be firing. A spamassassin -D --lint does show the module to be > loaded, and the module shows up in my amavisd-new logs: > > Jul 23 13:33:56 foo amavis[17285]: (17285-01) extra modules >

WrongMX from amavisd-new?

I installed WrongMX.pm today, on my secondary MX, but it does not appear to be firing. A spamassassin -D --lint does show the module to be loaded, and the module shows up in my amavisd-new logs: Jul 23 13:33:56 foo amavis[17285]: (17285-01) extra modules loaded: /etc/mail/spamassassin/Botnet.pm

Re: move spam to IMAP spam folder (amavisd-new,spamassassin,dovecot,postfix,squirrelmail)

e folders INBOX, Sent, Drafts, ..! Thanks! Morvan - Original Message - From: "Alex Woick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Morvan Daniel Müller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Spamassassin" Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 1:52 PM Subject: Re: move spam to IM

Re: move spam to IMAP spam folder (amavisd-new,spamassassin,dovecot,postfix,squirrelmail)

Morvan Daniel Müller schrieb am 20.11.2007 13:49: How I say to postfix to direct subject=[SPAM ] xx (mark by spamassassin) to ~home\mail\SPAM (imap folder) I'm using Mailbox no Maildir. Postfix deliver to /var/mail/$user and Dovecot read from mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u

move spam to IMAP spam folder (amavisd-new,spamassassin,dovecot,postfix,squirrelmail)

How I say to postfix to direct subject=[SPAM ] xx (mark by spamassassin) to ~home\mail\SPAM (imap folder) I'm using Mailbox no Maildir. Postfix deliver to /var/mail/$user and Dovecot read from mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u I read about using scripts in procmail/dropmail (t

Re: Choosing score set in amavisd-new

Leigh Sharpe wrote: > Hi all, > I've just installed a virgin debian 4.0 with spamassassin and > amavisd-new. I have > > $sa_local_tests_only=0; in /etc/amavis/conf.d/20-debian_defaults > and > skip_rbl_checks 0 in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf > >

Re: Choosing score set in amavisd-new

score DCC_CHECK 6 Regards Stan Leigh Sharpe a écrit : Hi all, I've just installed a virgin debian 4.0 with spamassassin and amavisd-new. I have $sa_local_tests_only=0; in /etc/amavis/conf.d/20-debian_defaults and skip_rbl_checks 0 in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf Yet for some r

Choosing score set in amavisd-new

Hi all, I've just installed a virgin debian 4.0 with spamassassin and amavisd-new. I have $sa_local_tests_only=0; in /etc/amavis/conf.d/20-debian_defaults and skip_rbl_checks 0 in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf Yet for some reason, when I run spamassassin -D --lint, I get these

RE: confusion with postfix+spamassassin+amavisd-new

> -Original Message- > From: JOYDEEP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 2:26 AM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: confusion with postfix+spamassassin+amavisd-new > > > Dear list, > > I am using suse 9.3 and confused wit

Re: confusion with postfix+spamassassin+amavisd-new

Michael Scheidell wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: JOYDEEP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 2:26 AM >> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >> Subject: confusion with postfix+spamassassin+amavisd-new >> >> >>

Re: confusion with postfix+spamassassin+amavisd-new

On Thursday 28 June 2007, JOYDEEP wrote: > Dear list, > > I am using suse 9.3 and confused with postfix+spamassassin+amavisd-new > > I have first installed amavisd-new and perl-spamassassin. Then I find > the /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file > I manually added an email ad

confusion with postfix+spamassassin+amavisd-new

Dear list, I am using suse 9.3 and confused with postfix+spamassassin+amavisd-new I have first installed amavisd-new and perl-spamassassin. Then I find the /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file I manually added an email address as black listed and start amavisd-new. then I check the email and

RE: Folks using amavisd-new and SA...

h SpamAssassin? And how well have you found amavisd-new, postfix and SpamAssassin to interact? Excellent. (note: please don't tell me to switch to mailscanner yet. hah.) I never would. This setup has been working well for quite a while but I'm almost wondering if it's time

Re: Folks using amavisd-new and SA...

; stuff and what kind of > hardware? What kind of performance are you seeing? I have it set at 2 for a hobby server and 4 for a low-load server. > And how well have you found amavisd-new, postfix and SpamAssassin to > interact? Been running great for me for a few years. > Has greylis

Folks using amavisd-new and SA...

, 1gb RAM. It's a PowerEdge 6350. What do you guys have set for max_servers & stuff and what kind of hardware? What kind of performance are you seeing? And how well have you found amavisd-new, postfix and SpamAssassin to interact? (note: please don't tell me to switch to mailscan

  1   2   >