> Train your Bayes, learn ham mail. Also, drop your AWL database and start
> fresh, since it currently maintains an average score of about 12 for
> that particular sender.
>
> Get rid of third party rules, if they don't apply to your particular
> mail stream. Seriously, reconsider *all* third party rules and review
> their performance on *your* mail. This is a problem you created
> yourself, not an issue with SA.
>
>
> Granted, assuming a neutral Bayes score, no AWL and no whitelisting,
> stock SA still scores that example at 5.078. Slightly beyond the
> threshold.
>
> However, properly learning ham will correct this, and a sane AWL
> database will help with future mail, too. If you keep your whitelist,
> you'll easily get the score down below 0.
>
> Also, you should consider LARTing the sender to use a proper MUA. Or, if
> you run into rules like MIME_HTML_ONLY frequently, adjust the score
> locally to better cope with your particular mail.
>
Hi guenther,
Yes I know it is my configuration problem and I did not suspect neither SA
nor amavisd issues. The thing is I don't know how to figure it out.
Your answer is seriously very details explanation. Now I understand the
problem.
Many thanks for your reply.
>
> Now, if someone please could translate Donis reply... ;)
;) He suspected the 99_FVGT_meta.cf rule making the high score so he asked
me to replace this rule to 00_FVGT_File001.cf. A good idea so I follow his
recommendation also. Thanks pak Doni.
Fuad NAHDI,
Jakarta, INDONESIA
>
> guenther
>
>
> --
> char
> *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
> main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8?
> c<<=1:
> (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0;
> }}}
>
>
