Updated that as well.
R-Elists wrote:
marc
dont forget this one
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/MarcPerkelsExperiments
- rh
From:
Marc Perkel [mailto:m...@perkel.com]
snip
Yes - the wiki is updated.
On 10/01/2009 12:42 PM, jdow wrote:
From: "Marc Perkel"
Sent: Wednesday, 2009/September/30 16:41
Blaine Fleming wrote: Marc Perkel wrote:
I like it.
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BR
Let's go with it.
Marc, have you updated your wiki to re
From: "Marc Perkel"
Sent: Wednesday, 2009/September/30 16:41
Blaine Fleming wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
I like it.
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BR
Let's go with it.
Marc, have you updated your wiki to reflect the new rules? I think
marc
dont forget this one
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/MarcPerkelsExperiments
- rh
_
From: Marc Perkel [mailto:m...@perkel.com]
snip
Yes - the wiki is updated.
Blaine Fleming wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
I like it.
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BR
Let's go with it.
Marc, have you updated your wiki to reflect the new rules? I think that
will pretty well settle any debate or qu
On ons 30 sep 2009 19:17:46 CEST, John Hardin wrote
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BR
+1
-2
the rule name is now longer then it was :/
--
xpoint
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Marc Perkel wrote:
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BR
+1
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2
Marc Perkel wrote:
> I like it.
>
> RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BL
> RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL
> RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YL
> RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BR
>
> Let's go with it.
Marc, have you updated your wiki to reflect the new rules? I think that
will pretty well settle any debate or question people have.
--Blaine
I like it.
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BR
Let's go with it.
Warren Togami wrote:
On 09/29/2009 08:56 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Could you please decide between the existing JMF rule names or the
above proposed HOSTKARMA names? It seems opinion
R-Elists wrote:
RCVD_HOSTKARMA_BL Black
RCVD_HOSTKARMA_WL White
RCVD_HOSTKARMA_YL Yellow
RCVD_HOSTKARMA_BR Brown
OTOH, I really like these new names. My brain thinks less
hard to recognize them.
How do other people feel. Should we stick to his old names
with JMF in the W
>
> I'll note that he's the one that said he prefers HOSTKARMA
> names, despite his own Wiki saying JMF.
>
> Warren
>
>
Warren,
so noted...
:-)
his wiki and his entries in the SA wiki too...
and this isnt a witch hunt by any means...
you desiring to set it up and run it through the SA
Warren Togami wrote:
> On 09/30/2009 12:18 AM, R-Elists wrote:
>>
>> warren,
>>
>> marc already decided once, please dont give more choices...
>>
>> you should have thought that out before putting the list in a minor
>> tiz on
>> it.
>>
>> - rh
>>
>
> I'll note that he's the one that said he pref
On 09/30/2009 12:18 AM, R-Elists wrote:
Marc,
Could you please decide between the existing JMF rule names
or the above proposed HOSTKARMA names? It seems opinions are
split here.
Warren
warren,
marc already decided once, please dont give more choices...
you should have thought that ou
>
> Marc,
>
> Could you please decide between the existing JMF rule names
> or the above proposed HOSTKARMA names? It seems opinions are
> split here.
>
> Warren
>
>
warren,
marc already decided once, please dont give more choices...
you should have thought that out before putting the l
>
> RCVD_HOSTKARMA_BL Black
> RCVD_HOSTKARMA_WL White
> RCVD_HOSTKARMA_YL Yellow
> RCVD_HOSTKARMA_BR Brown
>
> OTOH, I really like these new names. My brain thinks less
> hard to recognize them.
>
> How do other people feel. Should we stick to his old names
> with JMF in the Wiki or these
On 09/29/2009 08:56 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Could you please decide between the existing JMF rule names or the
above proposed HOSTKARMA names? It seems opinions are split here.
Warren
If there is a lack of consensus then I appoint you Warren to make the
final call. I personally have no strong
Warren Togami wrote:
On 09/29/2009 12:50 PM, Warren Togami wrote:
On 09/29/2009 12:45 PM, Henrik K wrote:
It seems that people have already been using the rules copied from
your
site. It will be confusing to them if we change the official name.
Some
will accidentally have your lists twice.
> On tir 29 sep 2009 23:30:15 CEST, Warren Togami wrote
>> Could you please decide between the existing JMF rule
>> names or the above proposed HOSTKARMA names? It seems
>> opinions are split here.
>
> let it be the long names that loose ?
>
> ironical you wanted to be shurt names but created a
On tir 29 sep 2009 23:30:15 CEST, Warren Togami wrote
Could you please decide between the existing JMF rule names or the
above proposed HOSTKARMA names? It seems opinions are split here.
let it be the long names that loose ?
ironical you wanted to be shurt names but created a longer one ?
-
Hi!
We're bikeshedding here, but I believe these names are better because it
is absolutely clear what it means without _IN. Shorter name is better
and easier to read I think.
Could you please decide between the existing JMF rule names or the above
proposed HOSTKARMA names? It seems opinions
On 09/29/2009 12:50 PM, Warren Togami wrote:
On 09/29/2009 12:45 PM, Henrik K wrote:
It seems that people have already been using the rules copied from your
site. It will be confusing to them if we change the official name. Some
will accidentally have your lists twice.
RCVD_HOSTKARMA_BL Black
R
>
> It seems that people have already been using the rules
> copied from your site. It will be confusing to them if
> we change the official name. Some will accidentally have
> your lists twice.
>
> RCVD_HOSTKARMA_BL Black
> RCVD_HOSTKARMA_WL White
> RCVD_HOSTKARMA_YL Yellow
> RCVD_HOSTKARMA_BR
Warren Togami wrote:
On 09/29/2009 12:45 PM, Henrik K wrote:
It seems that people have already been using the rules copied from your
site. It will be confusing to them if we change the official name. Some
will accidentally have your lists twice.
RCVD_HOSTKARMA_BL Black
RCVD_HOSTKARMA_WL White
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:50:13PM -0400, Warren Togami wrote:
> On 09/29/2009 12:45 PM, Henrik K wrote:
>>> It seems that people have already been using the rules copied from your
>>> site. It will be confusing to them if we change the official name. Some
>>> will accidentally have your lists twi
On 09/29/2009 12:45 PM, Henrik K wrote:
It seems that people have already been using the rules copied from your
site. It will be confusing to them if we change the official name. Some
will accidentally have your lists twice.
RCVD_HOSTKARMA_BL Black
RCVD_HOSTKARMA_WL White
RCVD_HOSTKARMA_YL Yell
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:06:13PM -0400, Warren Togami wrote:
> On 09/29/2009 10:23 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
> RCVD_HOSTKARMA_BL Black
> RCVD_HOSTKARMA_WL White
> RCVD_HOSTKARMA_YL Yellow
> RCVD_HOSTKARMA_BR Brown
>>>
>> I'm willing go go with whatever name works better for the commu
On 09/29/2009 10:23 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
RCVD_HOSTKARMA_BL Black
RCVD_HOSTKARMA_WL White
RCVD_HOSTKARMA_YL Yellow
RCVD_HOSTKARMA_BR Brown
I'm willing go go with whatever name works better for the community. I
will change my wiki to be consistent.
Hi Marc,
I appreciate your desire for ever
Responding to a lot of questions here. The lists contain both host names
and IP addresses. IP addresses everyone understands. So I'll talk about
host names. Wells Fargo Bank - for example - (wellsfargo.com - is in the
white list as is all of Wells Fargo's hosts. This bank sends nothing but
100%
28 matches
Mail list logo
