On 09/29/2009 08:56 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:

Could you please decide between the existing JMF rule names or the
above proposed HOSTKARMA names? It seems opinions are split here.

Warren


If there is a lack of consensus then I appoint you Warren to make the
final call. I personally have no strong preference. I do prefer
something with HOSTKARMA in it rather to JEF or JMF.

To me RCVD_IN_JMF_BL is difficult for my brain to instantly recognize. It isn't the length in characters but rather the short name JMF wrapped between underscores. I was leaning towards names like RCVD_HOSTKARMA_BL or RCVD_HOSTKARMA_WL. But then some people commented about the consistency of RCVD_IN_*.

RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BR

These look good to me. But then we have the transition confusion problem for those who manually configured to use your old JMF rules. I will decide later after we hear more opinions.

http://hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com/
Will this be a working redirector in the near future? There is no point in naming it HOSTKARMA if none of the URL's have hostkarma in their name.

Warren Togami
wtog...@redhat.com

Reply via email to