I like it.
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BR
Let's go with it.
Warren Togami wrote:
On 09/29/2009 08:56 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
Could you please decide between the existing JMF rule names or the
above proposed HOSTKARMA names? It seems opinions are split here.
Warren
If there is a lack of consensus then I appoint you Warren to make the
final call. I personally have no strong preference. I do prefer
something with HOSTKARMA in it rather to JEF or JMF.
To me RCVD_IN_JMF_BL is difficult for my brain to instantly recognize.
It isn't the length in characters but rather the short name JMF
wrapped between underscores. I was leaning towards names like
RCVD_HOSTKARMA_BL or RCVD_HOSTKARMA_WL. But then some people
commented about the consistency of RCVD_IN_*.
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BR
These look good to me. But then we have the transition confusion
problem for those who manually configured to use your old JMF rules.
I will decide later after we hear more opinions.
http://hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com/
Will this be a working redirector in the near future? There is no
point in naming it HOSTKARMA if none of the URL's have hostkarma in
their name.
Warren Togami
wtog...@redhat.com
