This is the OP of this issue.
I would like to report that my problem, after weeks of issue (That I didn't
have time to deal with it and so I just used the delete button as my spam
filter) seems to be unconditionally corrected.
What did I do?
I just posted my problem here, that is all. Now I do
On 3/3/2010 8:22 AM, twofers wrote:
> I have 52 of these sitting in my inbox this morning when I came in to
> work. this is just the beginning. I get literally hundreds of these a
> day and Spamassassin does not even check them.
>
> Thats hundreds of these every day for weeks and weeks and weeks
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 02:20 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> This OP's problem is unrelated. Rejecting at a spam score threshold of
> 5.
Oops. Sorry, this is incorrect. I was thinking about another thread
today. Been a long day with lots of discussions, threads and code to
jiggle. I'd better c
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 17:25 -0800, Bill Landry wrote:
> On Wed, March 3, 2010 5:20 pm, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 16:06 -0800, Bill Landry wrote:
> > > On Wed, March 3, 2010 5:38 am, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
(Please pay spacial attention, that these two lines are all that
On Wed, March 3, 2010 5:20 pm, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 16:06 -0800, Bill Landry wrote:
>> On Wed, March 3, 2010 5:38 am, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
> We're not going to re-hash one of the many discussions, err, heated
> flame-fests from the clamav and sanesecurity lists, a
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 16:06 -0800, Bill Landry wrote:
> On Wed, March 3, 2010 5:38 am, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
We're not going to re-hash one of the many discussions, err, heated
flame-fests from the clamav and sanesecurity lists, are we? ;)
This OP's problem is unrelated. Rejecting at a spam sco
On Wed, March 3, 2010 5:38 am, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> On 3.3.2010 15:34, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>> On 3.3.2010 15:22, twofers wrote:
>>> I have 52 of these sitting in my inbox this morning when I came in to
>>> work. this is just the beginning. I get literally hundreds of these a
>>> day and Sp
On 3.3.2010 15:34, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> On 3.3.2010 15:22, twofers wrote:
>> I have 52 of these sitting in my inbox this morning when I came in to
>> work. this is just the beginning. I get literally hundreds of these a
>> day and Spamassassin does not even check them.
>>
>> Thats hundreds o
On 3.3.2010 15:22, twofers wrote:
> I have 52 of these sitting in my inbox this morning when I came in to
> work. this is just the beginning. I get literally hundreds of these a
> day and Spamassassin does not even check them.
>
> Thats hundreds of these every day for weeks and weeks and weeks on
On 03/03/2010 13:22, twofers wrote:
I have 52 of these sitting in my inbox this morning when I came in to
work. this is just the beginning. I get literally hundreds of these a
day and Spamassassin does not even check them.
Suggest you configure SpamAssassin to check them then.
--
Mike Cardwel
56...@texstapes.com>
Subject: UPS Delivery Problem Number 3512
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 08:08:33 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="=_NextPart_000_0006_01CABA5D.4830E810"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.
11 matches
Mail list logo
