On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 17:25 -0800, Bill Landry wrote:
> On Wed, March 3, 2010 5:20 pm, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 16:06 -0800, Bill Landry wrote:
> > > On Wed, March 3, 2010 5:38 am, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
(Please pay spacial attention, that these two lines are all that was
left from the previous thread in my response.)
> > We're not going to re-hash one of the many discussions, err, heated
> > flame-fests from the clamav and sanesecurity lists, are we? ;)
> >
> > This OP's problem is unrelated. Rejecting at a spam score threshold of
> > 5.
> >
> > If we really want to go down the road of a clamav (?:SA plugin)?
> > discussion, at the very least change the Subject... Please, don't.
>
> My comments have absolutely nothing to do with the SpamAssassin ClamAV
> plugin. It does not even come into play here in my recommendations.
Right. Neither has the OP's problem. It is not related to ClamAV [1]
(and the ClamAV SA plugin). Hence, the flame-fest I just see forthcoming
given where the thread went, is unnecessary. It won't solve the original
problem.
And hey, it is off-topic here anyway. Sorry for my lousy attempt at
communicating the topic drift with a grain of humor. ;)
guenther
[1] I didn't talk about the plugin either. It is optional. Without using
the parentheses to capture the match...
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
