On Wed, March 3, 2010 5:20 pm, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 16:06 -0800, Bill Landry wrote: >> On Wed, March 3, 2010 5:38 am, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > > We're not going to re-hash one of the many discussions, err, heated > flame-fests from the clamav and sanesecurity lists, are we? ;) > > This OP's problem is unrelated. Rejecting at a spam score threshold of > 5. > > If we really want to go down the road of a clamav (?:SA plugin)? > discussion, at the very least change the Subject... Please, don't.
My comments have absolutely nothing to do with the SpamAssassin ClamAV plugin. It does not even come into play here in my recommendations. Bill
