On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 04:39:49PM -0800, Rich Shepard wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ /usr/local/bin/spamassassin -V
> spamassassin: spamassassin script is v3.001007, but using modules v3.002005
>
> How should I proceed to fix the installation so there's only one copy
> (either in /etc/mail/spam
On Mon, December 1, 2008 02:34, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>> you have installed 3.2.5 from cpan
>> and 3.1.7 in rpm ?
> Slackware doesn't use rpms. The slack packages end in .tgz and
> that's what the package tools work with.
pas then
--
Benny Pedersen
Need
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Benny Pedersen wrote:
you have installed 3.2.5 from cpan
and 3.1.7 in rpm ?
Benny,
Slackware doesn't use rpms. The slack packages end in .tgz and that's what
the package tools work with.
Rich
--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | IntegrityCredibilit
On Mon, December 1, 2008 01:39, Rich Shepard wrote:
> still have the MTA working.
you have installed 3.2.5 from cpan
and 3.1.7 in rpm ?
newer install cpan builds when host os is rpm based
google cpan2rpm
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
I (finally) upgraded my main server/workstation from Slackware-11.0 to
-12.0. After rebooting into the newer kernel, the mail system wasn't
working. Postfix was OK, and I traced the problem to SpamAssassin. Version
3.1.7 was installed.
Some perl modules needed to be upgraded, so I did those v
Shwetar (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
Argument "1 (Only if you have installed pyzor)" isn't numeric in numeric eq
(==) at /usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Parser.pm line 578.
Argument "1score BAYES_99 15.000" isn't numeric in numeric eq (==) at
/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/Pars
Shwetar (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am a newbie to SA... but the place where I am workin at wants me to
> help eliminate spam for them. I have been trying this for the past 6
> months... but cant figure out what I am missin out on...
> PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP!
>
> when
Hi all,
I am a newbie to SA... but the place where I am workin at wants me to help eliminate spam for them. I have been trying this for the past 6 months... but cant figure out what I am missin out on...
PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP PLEASE HELP!
when I run spamassassin --lint I get the foll. output..
On Wednesday, December 22, 2004, 8:38:04 AM, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 10:42 AM 12/22/2004, Ray Anderson wrote:
>>Greetings, I've been using spamassassin 2.55 for a while now on Mandrake 9.2.
>>
>>I have a list of URL's that are grouped to form a pretty big meta tag, and
>>this has worked great for
At 10:42 AM 12/22/2004, Ray Anderson wrote:
Greetings, I've been using spamassassin 2.55 for a while now on Mandrake 9.2.
I have a list of URL's that are grouped to form a pretty big meta tag, and
this has worked great for years now. Recently, one
dirtbag message has found a way through the defen
Second attempt:
Greetings, I've been using spamassassin 2.55 for a while now on Mandrake 9.2.
I have a list of URL's that are grouped to form a pretty big meta tag, and this
has worked great for years now. Recently, one
dirtbag message has found a way through the defenses and I can't figure out
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, September 8, 2004, 7:30:48 AM, Marco Bovenkamp wrote:
I run my
own mailserver, with SA.
Most people don't.
That's why I *also* said 'I probably don't qualify as your typical 'home
user''
I agree with you that a provider should do the filtering and the clients
shoul
On Wednesday, September 8, 2004, 7:30:48 AM, Marco Bovenkamp wrote:
> I run my
> own mailserver, with SA.
Most people don't.
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.surbl.org/
Hello Chris,
Wednesday, September 8, 2004, 7:15:26 AM, you wrote:
CS> Antispam should NOT happen at the client!
CS> It should happen at the ISP level. Otherwise POP3 or IMAP has already
CS> downloaded the stupid thing. Whats the sense in that? SO you don't
CS> have to read it, big whoop! Still t
Chris Santerre wrote:
Antispam should NOT happen at the client!
It should happen at the ISP level. Otherwise POP3 or IMAP has already
downloaded the stupid thing. Whats the sense in that? SO you don't have to
read it, big whoop! Still took up your time already.
With ever more people on some form of
>-Original Message-
>From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 11:10 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: SpamAssassin help
>
>
>From: "Robert Menschel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "lloe" <[EMAIL P
From: "Robert Menschel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "lloe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hello lloe,
>
> Tuesday, September 7, 2004, 9:47:13 AM, you wrote:
>
> l> Hello Fellow Users,
>
> l> When I saw Don's email " How neophytes without mastery of
> l> computers can use spamassassin. " I felt that I am someo
Hello lloe,
Tuesday, September 7, 2004, 9:47:13 AM, you wrote:
l> Hello Fellow Users,
l> When I saw Don's email " How neophytes without mastery of
l> computers can use spamassassin. " I felt that I am someone who is also
l> in Don's shoes.
My impression wasn't that Don was a neophyte, unable to
Hello Fellow
Users,
When I
saw Don's email " How neophytes without mastery of computers can use
spamassassin. " I felt that I am someone who is also in Don's
shoes.
I am a fairly new
person to PCs and do not feel strong enough in knowledge to understand what and
how I need to personal
19 matches
Mail list logo
