.0
The second one has BAYES_50 instead of BAYES_00 probably because
I had already sent the one to "sa-learn --spam --no-sync".
--
Vincent Lefèvre - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Pascaline project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025, Michel Arboi wrote:
I guess I'll have to blacklist some URI domains, but if anybody
finds a btter idea, I'll take it.
Bayes should handle that - especially if you don't actually speak
French...
Note the GDPR pseudo legal text. This is utter BS of course, as
this was not
I guess I'll have to blacklist some URI domains, but if anybody
finds a btter idea, I'll take it.
Note the GDPR pseudo legal text. This is utter BS of course, as
this was not sent to a professional address.
Ce message vous a été envoyé par DATAVENTURE GROUP dans le cadre de nos
activités de prosp
On 09.01.25 16:06, Max Erenburg via users wrote:
Yeah not trying to welcome them entirely, more so like other
well-known domains that are commonly seen and will not be
blacklisted (e.g. docs.google.com ).
I will try out:
uridnsbl_skip_domain ct.sendgrid.net
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025, Matus UHLAR
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 09.01.25 16:06, Max Erenburg via users wrote:
Yeah not trying to welcome them entirely, more so like other well-known
domains that are commonly seen and will not be blacklisted (e.g.
docs.google.com ).
I will try out:
uridnsbl_skip_domain
Le 10/01/2025 à 15:35, Bill Cole a écrit :
On 2025-01-10 at 08:49:04 UTC-0500 (Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:49:04 +0100)
John Wilcock
is rumored to have said:
Hi all,
I'm using Spamassassin 4.0.1 on Gentoo and I've recently switched to
using MySQL (actually Mariadb 10.6) for Bayes storage.
I'm seei
_query_restriction deny ct.sendgrid.net.multi.uribl.com
ct.sendgrid.net.multi.surbl.org ct.sendgrid.net.spamhaus.org
ct.sendgrid.net.lookup.dkimwl.org
From: Kevin A. McGrail
Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2025 9:10 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: [External] SA 4.0.1 - util_rb_3t
On 2025-01-10 at 08:49:04 UTC-0500 (Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:49:04 +0100)
John Wilcock
is rumored to have said:
Hi all,
I'm using Spamassassin 4.0.1 on Gentoo and I've recently switched to
using MySQL (actually Mariadb 10.6) for Bayes storage.
I'm seeing "WARNING: MYSQL_OPT_RECONNECT is deprecat
Hi all,
I'm using Spamassassin 4.0.1 on Gentoo and I've recently switched to
using MySQL (actually Mariadb 10.6) for Bayes storage.
I'm seeing "WARNING: MYSQL_OPT_RECONNECT is deprecated and will be
removed in a future version" warnings.
$ spamassassin --lint --debug=bayes
Jan 10 14:45:02.8
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: [External] SA 4.0.1 - util_rb_3tld
Looking to check if my understanding is correct or there is some sort of bug.
I have the following entry in my local.cf file:
util_rb_3tldct.sendgrid.net
I would expect that ‘ *.ct.sendgrid.net ‘ would be
Looking to check if my understanding is correct or there is some sort
of bug.
I have the following entry in my local.cf file:
util_rb_3tld ct.sendgrid.net
I would expect that ‘ *.ct.sendgrid.net ‘ would be excluded from any
URI BL lookups?
Hi Max, sorry, no. That command makes it so tha
Hello,
Looking to check if my understanding is correct or there is some sort of bug.
I have the following entry in my local.cf file:
util_rb_3tldct.sendgrid.net
I would expect that ' *.ct.sendgrid.net ' would be excluded from any URI BL
lookups?
However I see in my spamd log the following
On 2024-12-28 at 02:21:28 UTC-0500 (Sat, 28 Dec 2024 08:21:28 +0100)
Pierluigi Frullani
is rumored to have said:
> Hello all,
> it seems that bugzilla is not very active, at least for sa-learm stuffs.
Indeed, there are not a lot of fresh bugs in a project as old as SpamAssassin.
We do
Hello all,
it seems that bugzilla is not very active, at least for sa-learm stuffs.
I have just upgraded to 4.0.1 anf found that sa-learn has a problem ( and a
workaround ) when dealing with (imap) compressed files for which I've found
a workaround, and would like to report both.
Should I
already
be helping. :)
You might want to run it through SA with the rule hits flags on so that
you can tell if a new meta with some existing unscored rules might help.
What caught my eye was the unusual TLD in the HELO. That would be trivial
for a spammer to bypass, but it might help to look for un
On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 12:42:58PM -0500, pgnd wrote:
> , sneaking past my SA protections. Whether to call it snowshoe, I dunno :-/
> But my usually well fed Bayes isn't getting noticeably better with 'em.
> https://gist.github.com/pgnd/5ab934d921939f4c62a4c978a30
On 11/21/24 18:42, pgnd wrote:
Starting about 2 weeks ago, I've been playing whack-a-mole with waves of
'your mail box is full' phish, e.g.
"Subject: The storage on your Webmail account is about full. You've
used up all of the storage."
, sneaking past
On 2024-07-12 at 10:51:08 UTC-0400 (Fri, 12 Jul 2024 10:51:08 -0400)
Steve Charmer
is rumored to have said:
I have a cron job running as root, which calls sa-update
it warns about unsafe ownership
gpg: WARNING: unsafe ownership on homedir
I have a cron job running as root, which calls sa-update
it warns about unsafe ownership
gpg: WARNING: unsafe ownership on homedir
`/var/lib/spamassassin/sa-update-keys'
this is my cu
Paul Schmehl skrev den 2024-06-22 07:44:
It’s not clear to me from your answer. Does SA read rules in both
places?
it eveal first sa-update rules, then later host rules
Or only in /etc/mail/spamassassin/?
this is host rules, you define all global configs here, and it will
never be
On Sat, 22 Jun 2024, Paul Schmehl wrote:
On Jun 22, 2024, at 12:28 AM, Kenneth Porter
wrote:
On 6/21/2024 8:56 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I scratched my head, then looked up the man page for sa-update on the
web. Sure enough, that’s where the rules
go. Is that where my
> On Jun 22, 2024, at 12:28 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
>
> On 6/21/2024 8:56 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
>> I scratched my head, then looked up the man page for sa-update on the web.
>> Sure enough, that’s where the rules go. Is that where my local.cf file
>> should be
On 6/21/2024 8:56 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I scratched my head, then looked up the man page for sa-update on the
web. Sure enough, that’s where the rules go. Is that where my local.cf
file should be located? Right now it’s in /etc/mail/spamassassin.
There’s a default local.cf file in /var/lib
I just ran sa-updates. Then I looked in /etc/mail/spamassassin to see if the
rules had been updated, and none of them had today’s date on them
So, I downloaded the tar file, unzipped it, and searched for one of the files.
I found them in /var/lib/spamassassin/….
I scratched my head, then
Read the document. Upgraded. Ran sa-update (always forget that)
We really have a very simple setup, except for our homegrown integration wiith
our email system. So I added
enable_compat welcomelist_blocklist" to init.pre
Then did a search/replace of local.cf for all whitelist_fro
Anders Gustafsson skrev den 2024-06-16 13:42:
This one:
Return-path:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5 (2021-03-20) on xx
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-95.6 required=5.0
tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
MIME_HTML_ONLY,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5,RDNS_NONE,
On 16.06.24 14:42, Anders Gustafsson wrote:
Return-path:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5 (2021-03-20) on xx
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-95.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
MIME_HTML_ONLY,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5,RDNS_NONE,
TO_EQ_FM
This one:
Return-path:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5 (2021-03-20) on xx
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-95.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
MIME_HTML_ONLY,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5,RDNS_NONE,
TO_EQ_FM_DIRECT_MX,TO_NO_BRKTS_NORDNS_HTML
On 2024-05-18 at 10:26:54 UTC-0400 (Sat, 18 May 2024 16:26:54 +0200)
Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay
is rumored to have said:
Is there any difference between using spamc -L and sa-learn ?
On 18.05.24 11:41, Bill Cole wrote:
Yes. The compiled-C spamc binary loads no Perl, it just talks over a
On 2024-05-18 at 10:26:54 UTC-0400 (Sat, 18 May 2024 16:26:54 +0200)
Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay
is rumored to have said:
Hi,
Is there any difference between using spamc -L and sa-learn ?
Yes. The compiled-C spamc binary loads no Perl, it just talks over a
socket to spamd, which is
Hi,
Is there any difference between using spamc -L and sa-learn ? I noticed that
the later is way slower. I don’t use a journal for local updating, so both
write directly to the database.
Best,
Francis
On 2024-05-13 at 20:09:33 UTC-0400 (Tue, 14 May 2024 10:09:33 +1000)
Noel Butler
is rumored to have said:
This morning one of our ent_domains DMARC weekly report from a third
party was listed as spam by SA which took the wording
Not_percent-twenty_Resolved and passed it off to URI checks
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 8:10 PM Noel Butler wrote:
> This morning one of our ent_domains DMARC weekly report from a third party
> was listed as spam by SA which took the wording
> Not_percent-twenty_Resolved and passed it off to URI checks adding
> dot.com to it when there is no d
On 14.05.24 10:09, Noel Butler wrote:
This morning one of our ent_domains DMARC weekly report from a third
party was listed as spam by SA which took the wording
Not_percent-twenty_Resolved and passed it off to URI checks adding
dot.com to it when there is no dot com after it, and a raw
This morning one of our ent_domains DMARC weekly report from a third
party was listed as spam by SA which took the wording
Not_percent-twenty_Resolved and passed it off to URI checks adding
dot.com to it when there is no dot com after it, and a raw message
search of that message in less in
spf= field, would result in this error.
Sidney
Mateusz Krawczyk wrote on 20/04/24 1:07 am:
Hello,
after updating SA 4.0.0 to 4.0.1, (CentOS 7 - Perl version 5.16.3) I get
the following message in log regarding the DMARC plugin:
plugin: eval failed: Can't use an undefined value as an ARR
lt in this error.
Sidney
Mateusz Krawczyk wrote on 20/04/24 1:07 am:
Hello,
after updating SA 4.0.0 to 4.0.1, (CentOS 7 - Perl version 5.16.3) I get
the following message in log regarding the DMARC plugin:
plugin: eval failed: Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference
at /usr/s
that does not pass
a DMARC chack, has one or more Authentication-Results headers, and none
of them have an spf= field, would result in this error.
Sidney
Mateusz Krawczyk wrote on 20/04/24 1:07 am:
Hello,
after updating SA 4.0.0 to 4.0.1, (CentOS 7 - Perl version 5.16.3) I get
the foll
Hello,
after updating SA 4.0.0 to 4.0.1, (CentOS 7 - Perl version 5.16.3) I get
the following message in log regarding the DMARC plugin:
plugin: eval failed: Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference at
/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/DMARC.pm line 336.
File "DMAR
On 13/04/2024 19:27, Marc wrote:
All nice and well, but a bit decades to late. There should never have
been such default whitelist. Companies should take care not be on
blacklists, and should maintain some
Absolutely, no arguments there!
After all spf -all exists already for a long time. So
All nice and well, but a bit decades to late. There should never have been such
default whitelist. Companies should take care not be on blacklists, and should
maintain some degree of standard implementation to send out email. After all
spf -all exists already for a long time. So why are google/
On 13/04/2024 03:20, Bill Cole wrote:
In my opinion, this is an indication that the default welcomelist
entries in the official
I'm good with that, so long as likes of google are not in any whitelist
either.
I haven't been following all the anti spam stuff as much as I used to (I
have peop
ll
justified as far as I know. This is entirely unrelated to any domains hosted by
Microsoft, it is strictly an email address welcomelisting (see SA docs for
details.)
+1
This may raise some questions and trigger a debate on the formal meaning of the
SA default welcomelist entries. That d
which is still
justified as far as I know. This is entirely unrelated to any domains hosted by
Microsoft, it is strictly an email address welcomelisting (see SA docs for
details.)
I will be committing the rule change today and it should appear in the default
rules distribution channel by Mon
> On Jul 22, 2020, at 23:56, Luis E. Muñoz wrote:
>
> On 22 Jul 2020, at 23:14, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
>> However, I have questions of adoption rate, impersonation concerns,
>> anticompetitive concerns, and privacy concerns. This just sounds like a
>> commercial tracking pixel but the dev
s in 4.x, so without any specific
details I can't really offer a solution.
I can say that AS ALWAYS it is a bad idea to build and test ANY software
as 'root' and SA does not accommodate doing so. There may well be places
where the tests fail slowly if you run them as root. The on
, why? because its tests
failed for timeouts this, timeouts that, everytime its set keeps on
retrying reporting
Why don't you install SA from packaging system? Don't you use FreeBSD or
some linux distro?
error: config: no rules were found! Do you need to run 'sa-update'?
c
I chose to install this whilst we left for lunch, but 45mins
> later to my horror it was still trying to install, why? because its tests
> failed for timeouts this, timeouts that, everytime its set keeps on
> retrying reporting
>
> error: config: no rules were found! Do you need to ru
timeouts this, timeouts that, everytime its set keeps on
retrying reporting
error: config: no rules were found! Do you need to run 'sa-update'?
config: no rules were found! Do you need to run 'sa-update'?
of fricken course there is no rules, its a new fricken install that cp
On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 15:15 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Byung-Hee HWANG skrev den 2024-01-19 11:12:
>
> > I rely on DNSWL for the reputable MX.
>
> if repution is 100% needed we all have to make local rescore on all
> local mails, since repution is to be local, not external just
>
> i consid
On Fri, 19 Jan 2024, Thomas Cameron wrote:
On 1/19/24 16:32, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
There is a filtering rule in Gmail:
*Never send it to Spam*
I apply that rule to extremely important emails such as debian-bugs-
dist and debian-devel-announce.
You know that. I know that. But trying to
On 1/19/24 16:32, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
There is a filtering rule in Gmail:
*Never send it to Spam*
I apply that rule to extremely important emails such as debian-bugs-
dist and debian-devel-announce.
You know that. I know that. But trying to explain to the board members
I'm helping out is.
Hellow Thomas,
> But it drops it into the spam folder every time. So when I'm sending
> emails to someone's alias, they have to check their spam folder. Even
> when they mark it as "not spam," GMail still drops it into the spam
> folder. It's very frustrating.
>
There is a filtering rule in Gm
On 1/19/24 14:33, Matija Nalis wrote:
You would need to encourage at least several of the recepients (the
more the better) to click on "Not spam" button on GMail on such
mails. Then it will (eventually) start accepting them normally.
Yup, that's basically what I've been doing.
see e.g.
https
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 10:37:13AM -0600, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> The forwarded email is being *accepted* by GMail. My issue now is that GMail
> drops it into the recipient's spam folder. I suspect it's a reputation
> thing. Once the server is up and running for a while, I'm hoping that GMail
> wil
On 1/7/24 05:40, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I built email servers for a non-profit I volunteer for. If email
comes into the server for presid...@myassociation.org, I would
normally just create an alias in /etc/aliases so that emails to
president@ get forwarded to the president's "real" emai
On 1/7/24 04:07, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
Hellow Thomas,
See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1043539#88
Sincerely, Byung-Hee
The issue is not so much that GMail doesn't accept the email. It does,
since I have DKIM, DMARC, and SPF set up.
But it drops it into the spam folde
Byung-Hee HWANG skrev den 2024-01-19 11:12:
I rely on DNSWL for the reputable MX.
if repution is 100% needed we all have to make local rescore on all
local mails, since repution is to be local, not external just
i consider dnswl level 0 to be possitive scored, and let the other
levels be n
Marc skrev den 2024-01-19 09:34:
Hi Byung and Benny, are you having a nice MX party? :)
not needed yet, hehe
Byung-Hee HWANG skrev den 2024-01-19 06:16:
Actually i used Google MX for 10 years. Recently, i created dedicated
MXs and am continuing to operate them. Plus, the dedicated MXs run on
Google Cloud and RimuHosting.
it was to vierd for me to figure out how to get it working, and posible
in the
On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 08:34 +, Marc wrote:
> > > Byung-Hee HWANG skrev den 2024-01-08 12:27:
> > >
> > > > Gmail is my last INBOX. That's enough for me.
> > >
> > > +1, so you are ready to setup google mx ? :)
> > >
> >
> > Hellow Benny,
> >
> > Actually i used Google MX for 10 years. Rece
> > Byung-Hee HWANG skrev den 2024-01-08 12:27:
> >
> > > Gmail is my last INBOX. That's enough for me.
> >
> > +1, so you are ready to setup google mx ? :)
> >
>
> Hellow Benny,
>
> Actually i used Google MX for 10 years. Recently, i created dedicated
> MXs and am continuing to operate them. Plu
On Mon, 2024-01-08 at 17:17 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Byung-Hee HWANG skrev den 2024-01-08 12:27:
>
> > Gmail is my last INBOX. That's enough for me.
>
> +1, so you are ready to setup google mx ? :)
>
Hellow Benny,
Actually i used Google MX for 10 years. Recently, i created dedicated
MXs
Byung-Hee HWANG skrev den 2024-01-08 12:27:
Gmail is my last INBOX. That's enough for me.
+1, so you are ready to setup google mx ? :)
https://support.google.com/a/answer/140034?hl=en
i don't like it yet, missing dnssec and dane, tlsa, google is not
friendly there
if google wants my money
This is not a good advice. Whoever filters SPF at SMTP time will
reject that
message. Gmail is not the only mail service available.
On 08.01.24 20:27, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
Gmail is my last INBOX. That's enough for me.
that's what I wanted to say - enough for someone, but not generally enoug
>
> This is not a good advice. Whoever filters SPF at SMTP time will
> reject that
> message. Gmail is not the only mail service available.
Hellow Matus,
Gmail is my last INBOX. That's enough for me.
Sincerely, Byung-Hee
--
^고맙습니다 _布德天下_ 감사합니다_^))//
I built email servers for a non-profit I volunteer for. If email comes
into the server for presid...@myassociation.org, I would normally just
create an alias in /etc/aliases so that emails to president@ get
forwarded to the president's "real" email address, say
presidents_real_em...@gmail.com.
>
> I built email servers for a non-profit I volunteer for. If email
> comes
> into the server for presid...@myassociation.org, I would normally
> just
> create an alias in /etc/aliases so that emails to president@ get
> forwarded to the president's "real" email address, say
> presidents_real_
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 01:24:02PM -0600, Thomas Cameron via users wrote:
> On 1/2/24 17:51, Andy Smith wrote:
> > - Have your users collect their your-org email by some means other
> >than SMTP, such as running an IMAP server and having them view
> >both their gmail mailbox and the
On 1/4/24 06:35, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 03.01.24 20:36, Thomas Cameron wrote:
Fair point. But I'm guessing that because it has two DKIM signatures,
it's not passing the DKIM check.
only one of those DKIM dignatures needs to pass, with the domain in From:
Yup, and it seems to be wor
On 1/4/24 06:31, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 03.01.24 19:30, Thomas Cameron wrote:
Thanks for the advice on SRS - I have set it up and it's mostly
working. At least GMail accepts the emails, although it seems to be
failing DKIM and DMARC tests. I'm digging into what, if anything, can
be d
Thomas Cameron writes:
Yeah, the weird thing is, when I check the forwarded email on GMail, I
see in the headers that both the original sending email server (call
it mail.somedomain.com) and the relay server (call it
mail.myassociation.org) put DKIM signatures in the message.
On 1/3/24 19:45,
On 1/3/24 15:44, Bill Cole wrote:
Indeed: your solution is known as "SRS" (Sender Rewriting Scheme)
and it has multiple implementations. If you forward mail, you will
break SPF unless you fix the envelope sender so that it uses a
domain that permits the example.org server to send for it.
OR,
On 1/3/24 19:45, Greg Troxel wrote:
Thomas Cameron writes:
Yeah, the weird thing is, when I check the forwarded email on GMail, I
see in the headers that both the original sending email server (call
it mail.somedomain.com) and the relay server (call it
mail.myassociation.org) put DKIM signa
Thomas Cameron writes:
> Yeah, the weird thing is, when I check the forwarded email on GMail, I
> see in the headers that both the original sending email server (call
> it mail.somedomain.com) and the relay server (call it
> mail.myassociation.org) put DKIM signatures in the message.
That's more
On 1/3/24 17:41, Greg Troxel wrote:
You are overlooking that DKIM from the original From: is the
responsibility of that domain and that if you do not modify the message
then it should still pass. Domains sending without DKIM are going to be
a mess.
Yeah, the weird thing is, when I check the fo
On 1/3/24 15:44, Bill Cole wrote:
Indeed: your solution is known as "SRS" (Sender Rewriting Scheme) and it
has multiple implementations. If you forward mail, you will break SPF
unless you fix the envelope sender so that it uses a domain that
permits the example.org server to send for it.
O
On 1/3/24 18:16, Michael Grant wrote:
Here's what I have done in the past from my server to get around this
situation you are having:
1. In my .procmailrc file
:0c:
!exam...@gmail.com
This sends a copy (the c flag in first line) of the message to the
gmail account and leaves a copy in your inb
Here's what I have done in the past from my server to get around this
situation you are having:
1. In my .procmailrc file
:0c:
!exam...@gmail.com
This sends a copy (the c flag in first line) of the message to the
gmail account and leaves a copy in your inbox.
2. From your exam...@gmail.com acct
"Thomas Cameron via users" writes:
> I actually set up SPF, DMARC, and DKIM on the non-profit's email
> server. It works fine if I send email from the server.
>
> The rub is, I want all emails to presid...@example.org to be forwarded
> to presidents_real_addr...@gmail.com. Since the forward happe
Hello Thomas,
This might help too:
These failures are often due to SPFs that have a hard fail (meaning they end
with ‘-all’). When I dealt with this in the past, the original sending domain
was one where we could modify the SPF. So we had the email sender change “-all”
to “~all” and since that
On 2024-01-03 at 14:17:11 UTC-0500 (Wed, 3 Jan 2024 13:17:11 -0600)
Thomas Cameron via users
is rumored to have said:
The rub is, I want all emails to presid...@example.org to be forwarded
to presidents_real_addr...@gmail.com. Since the forward happens at
mail.example.org, the "from" is from s
On 1/2/24 17:51, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 04:24:37PM -0600, Thomas Cameron via users wrote:
I built email servers for a non-profit I volunteer for. If email comes into
the server for presid...@myassociation.org, I would normally just create an
alias in /etc/aliases s
hout them. This is just an odd corner
case where the easiest thing to do is just redirect emails to the
non-profit's president's real email address.
Instead of using /etc/aliases, I'm playing around with a procmail recipe
to munge the "from." We'll see if it works.
, SPF/DKIM/DMARC Auth-neutral will become the
new "bad".
I apologize this isn't strictly SA related, I am just hoping someone
can give me advice or provide I link to follow on how to make this work.
package: opendkim + access to your managed domain's DNS records.
$0.02,
-- Jared Hall
"Thomas Cameron via users" writes:
> I built email servers for a non-profit I volunteer for. If email comes
> into the server for presid...@myassociation.org, I would normally just
> create an alias in /etc/aliases so that emails to president@ get
> forwarded to the president's "real" email addre
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 04:24:37PM -0600, Thomas Cameron via users wrote:
> I built email servers for a non-profit I volunteer for. If email comes into
> the server for presid...@myassociation.org, I would normally just create an
> alias in /etc/aliases so that emails to president@ get
apologize this isn't strictly SA related, I am just hoping someone can
give me advice or provide I link to follow on how to make this work.
Thanks,
Thomas
what is in the /etc/mail/spamassassin/.razor/razor-agent.conf ?
debuglevel = 3
identity = identity
ignorelist = 0
listfile_catalogue = servers.catalogue.lst
listfile_discovery = servers.discovery.lst
listfile_nomination = servers.nomination.lst
On 27.12.23 10:30, AJ Weber wrote:
Migrating a mailserver with SA and I see this in my log when testing:
spamd[30912]: razor2: razor2 check failed: No such file or directory
razor2: Can't read: /var/lib/razor/ at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Razor2.pm line
331.
Thanks for the reply.
SA v3.4.6
razor is installed:
optional module installed: Razor2::Client::Agent, version 2.84
razor plugin is enabled in v310.pre:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2
I don't see any "logs" in the first page of the lint output.
Would you b
AJ Weber skrev den 2023-12-27 16:30:
Migrating a mailserver with SA and I see this in my log when testing:
spamd[30912]: razor2: razor2 check failed: No such file or directory
razor2: Can't read: /var/lib/razor/ at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Razor2.pm line
Migrating a mailserver with SA and I see this in my log when testing:
spamd[30912]: razor2: razor2 check failed: No such file or directory
razor2: Can't read: /var/lib/razor/ at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Razor2.pm line 331.
My local.cf has the foll
On 12/6/2023 5:19 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
can't procmail use X-Spam-Flag ?
I think the reason I run it twice is that the mimedefang invocation
doesn't have access to personal Bayes data. When it runs, it's not yet
known what user(s) the mail is destined for.
Kenneth Porter skrev den 2023-12-06 08:25:
On 12/5/2023 10:57 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
mimedefang does not use spamd, you only need either spamassassin only
with spamd or mimedefang with spamassassin not running spamd
It's a small server so I can afford to run SA twice, once at th
ll server so I can afford to run SA twice, once at the MTA
> level through mimedefang (which can potentially reject egregious
> spam),
> and once during delivery via procmail, which invokes spamc.
>
>
I'm run ing the XFCE spin of Redhat Linux and found
vmlinuz-6.6.2-101.fc38.x
On 12/6/23 08:25, Kenneth Porter wrote:
On 12/5/2023 10:57 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
mimedefang does not use spamd, you only need either spamassassin only with spamd or mimedefang with spamassassin not running spamd
It's a small server so I can afford to run SA twice, once at the MTA
On 12/5/2023 10:57 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
mimedefang does not use spamd, you only need either spamassassin only
with spamd or mimedefang with spamassassin not running spamd
It's a small server so I can afford to run SA twice, once at the MTA
level through mimedefang (which can potent
Kenneth Porter skrev den 2023-12-06 00:29:
After installing the package, I found I needed to manually restart
spamd and also mimedefang with:
# systemctl restart spamassassin
# systemctl restart mimedefang
After that I saw errors from my nightly sa-learn jobs about a missing
HashCash module
After installing the package, I found I needed to manually restart spamd
and also mimedefang with:
# systemctl restart spamassassin
# systemctl restart mimedefang
After that I saw errors from my nightly sa-learn jobs about a missing
HashCash module. I checked for a .rpmnew file in /etc/mail
1 - 100 of 1018 matches
Mail list logo
