On 2024-05-18 at 10:26:54 UTC-0400 (Sat, 18 May 2024 16:26:54 +0200)
Francis Augusto Medeiros-Logeay <r...@med-lo.eu>
is rumored to have said:
Hi,
Is there any difference between using spamc -L and sa-learn ?
Yes. The compiled-C spamc binary loads no Perl, it just talks over a
socket to spamd, which is always running and so always has the advantage
of a warmed-up i/o cache and a permanently loaded set of Perl code
objects pre-compiled and in RAM; sa-learn has to open and compile all of
the needed SA Perl code on every launch.
I noticed that the later is way slower.
Yes, it is. It is quite expensive to execute perl and have it load the
many SpamAssassin modules needed to learn a message.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo@toad.social and many *@billmail.scconsult.com
addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
