Re: SOUGHT 2.0

2014-12-05 Thread jdow
On 2014-12-05 08:28, Axb wrote: On 12/05/2014 05:20 PM, Kris Deugau wrote: Axb wrote: On 12/05/2014 01:15 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 22:41:13 +0100, Axb wrote: Axb> To be able to create usable rules, several times/day I need feeds Axb> to spit *at least* +150k/day. As I don

Re: SOUGHT 2.0

2014-12-05 Thread Philip Prindeville
On Dec 4, 2014, at 2:41 PM, Axb wrote: > On 12/04/2014 10:30 PM, Bob Proulx wrote: >> Axb wrote: >>> It's been more than a month since my first "SOUGHT 2.0" msg. >>> >>> A few have shown interest but as there hasn't been the flood of en

Re: SOUGHT 2.0

2014-12-05 Thread Axb
On 12/05/2014 05:20 PM, Kris Deugau wrote: Axb wrote: On 12/05/2014 01:15 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 22:41:13 +0100, Axb wrote: Axb> To be able to create usable rules, several times/day I need feeds Axb> to spit *at least* +150k/day. As I don't have the data 150k of wha

Re: SOUGHT 2.0

2014-12-05 Thread Kris Deugau
Axb wrote: > On 12/05/2014 01:15 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: >> On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 22:41:13 +0100, >> Axb wrote: >> >> Axb> To be able to create usable rules, several times/day I need feeds >> Axb> to spit *at least* +150k/day. As I don't have the data >> >> 150k of what? Bytes? Emails? Token

Re: SOUGHT 2.0

2014-12-05 Thread Axb
On 12/05/2014 02:27 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote: On 4. dec. 2014 22.42.42 Axb wrote: To be able to create usable rules, several times/day I need feeds to spit *at least* +150k/day. As I don't have the data So not possible to make it run decentraly ? This imho another precompiled problem

Re: SOUGHT 2.0

2014-12-05 Thread Axb
On 12/05/2014 01:15 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 22:41:13 +0100, Axb wrote: Axb> To be able to create usable rules, several times/day I need feeds Axb> to spit *at least* +150k/day. As I don't have the data 150k of what? Bytes? Emails? Tokens? Sorry, thought this was o

Re: SOUGHT 2.0

2014-12-04 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 4. dec. 2014 22.42.42 Axb wrote: To be able to create usable rules, several times/day I need feeds to spit *at least* +150k/day. As I don't have the data So not possible to make it run decentraly ? This imho another precompiled problem

Re: SOUGHT 2.0

2014-12-04 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 22:41:13 +0100, Axb wrote: Axb> To be able to create usable rules, several times/day I need feeds Axb> to spit *at least* +150k/day. As I don't have the data 150k of what? Bytes? Emails? Tokens? -- Please *no* private copies of mailing list or newsgroup messages. Rul

Re: SOUGHT 2.0

2014-12-04 Thread Axb
On 12/04/2014 10:30 PM, Bob Proulx wrote: Axb wrote: It's been more than a month since my first "SOUGHT 2.0" msg. A few have shown interest but as there hasn't been the flood of enthusiasm and stuff getting done which I hoped for so I've dropped the idea of getting a

Re: SOUGHT 2.0

2014-12-04 Thread Bob Proulx
Axb wrote: > It's been more than a month since my first "SOUGHT 2.0" msg. > > A few have shown interest but as there hasn't been the flood of enthusiasm > and stuff getting done which I hoped for so I've dropped the idea of getting > a public autogene

Re: SOUGHT 2.0

2014-12-04 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 4. dec. 2014 18.50.41 Axb wrote: It's been more than a month since my first "SOUGHT 2.0" msg. +1 A few have shown interest but as there hasn't been the flood of enthusiasm and stuff getting done which I hoped for so I've dropped the idea of getting a public au

Re: SOUGHT 2.0

2014-12-04 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 12/04/14 18:49, Axb wrote: A few have shown interest but as there hasn't been the flood of enthusiasm and stuff getting done which I hoped for so I've dropped the idea of getting a public autogenerated rule set / sa-update channel going. Hello. With the risk of sounding stupid... I would

SOUGHT 2.0

2014-12-04 Thread Axb
It's been more than a month since my first "SOUGHT 2.0" msg. A few have shown interest but as there hasn't been the flood of enthusiasm and stuff getting done which I hoped for so I've dropped the idea of getting a public autogenerated rule set / sa-update channel goi

Re: SOUGHT 2.0 ?

2014-11-14 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 02:08:30PM +0100, Axb wrote: > >>As Alex has said there's a need for mirrors etc. - that could > >>potentially be the biggest impact on volunteers (assuming they offer > >>to help with that aspect) since they will be a more public facing > >>contribution and it would be grea

Re: SOUGHT 2.0 ?

2014-11-13 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:28:30 -, "Kevin Golding" wrote: Kevin> The main thing that's going to be needed is good, reliable, Kevin> data. We'll only get good rules with good feeds. That should be Kevin> fairly low impact for people in many respects. Kevin> Obviously there's always room to help

Re: SOUGHT 2.0 ?

2014-11-13 Thread Tom Johnson
We (MailRoute) would be happy to pitch in. We can host mirrors in a couple of datacenters (Los Angeles and Chicago). And we'll help out wherever else we can. Tom

Re: SOUGHT 2.0 ?

2014-11-13 Thread Axb
On 11/13/2014 12:54 PM, Anthony Cartmell wrote: As Alex has said there's a need for mirrors etc. - that could potentially be the biggest impact on volunteers (assuming they offer to help with that aspect) since they will be a more public facing contribution and it would be great if it didn't spen

Re: SOUGHT 2.0 ?

2014-11-13 Thread Anthony Cartmell
As Alex has said there's a need for mirrors etc. - that could potentially be the biggest impact on volunteers (assuming they offer to help with that aspect) since they will be a more public facing contribution and it would be great if it didn't spend more time offline than online. What so

Re: SOUGHT 2.0 ?

2014-11-13 Thread Kevin Golding
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 02:17:54 -, Ian Zimmerman wrote: On Sat, 01 Nov 2014 10:06:57 -, "Kevin Golding" wrote: Kevin> So anyone else want to raise their hands? It depends. Would I mind a bit of regular maintenance work? No, I wouldn't mind. Would I mind a major change in how I run my

Re: SOUGHT 2.0 ?

2014-11-12 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On Sat, 01 Nov 2014 10:06:57 -, "Kevin Golding" wrote: Kevin> So anyone else want to raise their hands? It depends. Would I mind a bit of regular maintenance work? No, I wouldn't mind. Would I mind a major change in how I run my server - for instance, run a virus checker, or run the bleed

Re: SOUGHT 2.0 ?

2014-11-01 Thread Kevin Golding
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 20:10:22 -, Bob Proulx wrote: Axb wrote: It would be nice to be able to use this experience to replace the SOUGHT rules for everyone BUT: ... All very good, reasonable and understandable reasons. And those reasons also aply to me too. Insert all of those reasons i

Re: SOUGHT 2.0 ?

2014-10-30 Thread Bob Proulx
Axb wrote: > As most have probably noticed, the SOUGHT rules are not being publish/ > updated anymore. (you can shutdown your updates) Yes. A shame since they were quite effective here at tagging spam. > An option was to run such a project under the Apache umbrella but it makes > it a VERY compl

SOUGHT 2.0 ?

2014-10-22 Thread Axb
As most have probably noticed, the SOUGHT rules are not being publish/ updated anymore. (you can shutdown your updates) The reasons for this are beyond this msg. An option was to run such a project under the Apache umbrella but it makes it a VERY complicated process. Thanks to Justin Mason