Axb wrote: > On 12/05/2014 01:15 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: >> On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 22:41:13 +0100, >> Axb <axb.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Axb> To be able to create usable rules, several times/day I need feeds >> Axb> to spit *at least* +150k/day. As I don't have the data.... >> >> 150k of what? Bytes? Emails? Tokens? > > Sorry, thought this was obvious... > > SOUGHT type rule generation extracts txt strings from spams so it means > +150k spams/day
It seems to work reasonably well for me with ~2-3K each ham and spam, and even provides a handful of subrules even with ~225 spam subtype messages. (I generate a number of sets of rules with different subtypes of spam.) It's probably not nearly as *effective* as it could be with larger working sets. -kgd
