On 12/05/2014 05:20 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
Axb wrote:
On 12/05/2014 01:15 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 22:41:13 +0100,
Axb <axb.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
Axb> To be able to create usable rules, several times/day I need feeds
Axb> to spit *at least* +150k/day. As I don't have the data....
150k of what? Bytes? Emails? Tokens?
Sorry, thought this was obvious...
SOUGHT type rule generation extracts txt strings from spams so it means
+150k spams/day
It seems to work reasonably well for me with ~2-3K each ham and spam,
and even provides a handful of subrules even with ~225 spam subtype
messages. (I generate a number of sets of rules with different subtypes
of spam.)
It's probably not nearly as *effective* as it could be with larger
working sets.
Agreed.
... I use about 5-15k from the last 8 hrs (amount varies dramatically)
per rule gen run *for local* use, but that's hardly representative for
global coverage.
