Hello Jeff,
Saturday, December 11, 2004, 12:11:18 AM, you wrote:
JC> On Friday, December 10, 2004, 11:59:35 PM, Robert Menschel wrote:
JC>>> But "Get a capable html e-mailer" could also be generic
JC>>> text for non-MIME or non-HTML capable mail clients to see. ...
>> I know that my company wou
--On Friday, December 10, 2004 7:52 PM -0800 Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
But "Get a capable html e-mailer" could also be generic
text for non-MIME or non-HTML capable mail clients to see.
It's highly lame (especially when messages should be in
plain text IMO), but it could appear in hams
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 23:59:35 -0800
Robert Menschel wrote:
> However, if you were in
> business and sending emails to your customers or clients, would you
> insult them with the demand "Get a capable html e-mailer"? Any company
> that does that to me loses my business without any second thoughts.
>
On Friday, December 10, 2004, 11:59:35 PM, Robert Menschel wrote:
> Hello Jeff,
> Friday, December 10, 2004, 7:52:50 PM, you wrote:
JC>> On Friday, December 10, 2004, 1:21:19 PM, Robert Menschel wrote:
LW You mean something like this? Works like a charm.
>>> Agreed. Hope to have my own mass-
Hello Jeff,
Friday, December 10, 2004, 7:52:50 PM, you wrote:
JC> On Friday, December 10, 2004, 1:21:19 PM, Robert Menschel wrote:
LW>>> You mean something like this? Works like a charm.
>> Agreed. Hope to have my own mass-check results of this shortly (my
>> version is slightly different from y
On Friday, December 10, 2004, 1:21:19 PM, Robert Menschel wrote:
> Hello Loren,
> Friday, December 10, 2004, 10:33:02 AM, you wrote:
>>> > Got a couple spams today that slipped by SA with a plain text and HTML
>>> > part, and this was the plain text part:
>>> > "Get a capable html e-mailer"
>>> .
Hello Loren,
Friday, December 10, 2004, 10:33:02 AM, you wrote:
>> > Got a couple spams today that slipped by SA with a plain text and HTML
>> > part, and this was the plain text part:
>> > "Get a capable html e-mailer"
>> ...
>> I've seen this mentioned a couple of times recently. If it's really
> > Got a couple spams today that slipped by SA with a plain text and HTML
> > part, and this was the plain text part:
> >
> > "Get a capable html e-mailer"
> >
> > Do you sense a certain frustration with us? ;)
>
> I sense a great string to filter on.
>
> I've seen this mentioned a couple of times
> Got a couple spams today that slipped by SA with a plain text and HTML
> part, and this was the plain text part:
>
> "Get a capable html e-mailer"
>
> Do you sense a certain frustration with us? ;)
I sense a great string to filter on.
I've seen this mentioned a couple of times recently. If it's
On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 07:13, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> Got a couple spams today that slipped by SA with a plain text and HTML
> part, and this was the plain text part:
>
> "Get a capable html e-mailer"
>
> Do you sense a certain frustration with us? ;)
I have a specific kill rule for MUA snobbery
Got a couple spams today that slipped by SA with a plain text and HTML
part, and this was the plain text part:
"Get a capable html e-mailer"
Do you sense a certain frustration with us? ;)
11 matches
Mail list logo
