> Got a couple spams today that slipped by SA with a plain text and HTML > part, and this was the plain text part: > > "Get a capable html e-mailer" > > Do you sense a certain frustration with us? ;)
I sense a great string to filter on. I've seen this mentioned a couple of times recently. If it's really diagnostic of spamware - which it probably is - it might not hurt to write a rule for it. Of course the 'insult' may not be specifically targeted at spam-hostile recipients (us), but simply at people who prefer to use plaintext mail clients and regard HTML email as an invention of Satan. There's a large overlap between the two groups, but they're not identical by any means. Angus
