On Friday, December 10, 2004, 11:59:35 PM, Robert Menschel wrote: > Hello Jeff,
> Friday, December 10, 2004, 7:52:50 PM, you wrote: JC>> On Friday, December 10, 2004, 1:21:19 PM, Robert Menschel wrote: LW>>>> You mean something like this? Works like a charm. >>> Agreed. Hope to have my own mass-check results of this shortly (my >>> version is slightly different from yours). Looks real useful so far. JC>> But "Get a capable html e-mailer" could also be generic JC>> text for non-MIME or non-HTML capable mail clients to see. JC>> It's highly lame (especially when messages should be in JC>> plain text IMO), but it could appear in hams. > Agreed -- the possibility of FP exists. However, if you were in > business and sending emails to your customers or clients, would you > insult them with the demand "Get a capable html e-mailer"? Any company > that does that to me loses my business without any second thoughts. > I know that my company would never think of saying anything like that > to any of our customers nor our vendors. I've seen similar portions of messages with less rude wording but similar meaning, e.g., "this message can only be properly viewed with an HTML-capable program" or something similar. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
