> On Nov 6, 2016, at 4:54 PM, Marc Stürmer wrote:
>
> Am 04.11.2016 um 12:23 schrieb Holger Schramm:
>
>> If you don't like them, don't use their services. It is really that easy.
>
> That's the one part, the other part is what Dianne wrote about. If this
> happens to you better be sure to ha
Am 04.11.2016 um 12:23 schrieb Holger Schramm:
If you don't like them, don't use their services. It is really that easy.
That's the one part, the other part is what Dianne wrote about. If this
happens to you better be sure to have a 2nd MX ready with a totally
different IP address.
Every
On 11/4/2016 11:03 AM, Dianne Skoll wrote:
On Fri, 4 Nov 2016 12:23:16 +0100
Holger Schramm wrote:
If you don't like them, don't use their services. It is really that
easy.
It's not that easy. If you provide email services to a large number
of people and someone they are trying to correspond
On Fri, 4 Nov 2016 12:23:16 +0100
Holger Schramm wrote:
> If you don't like them, don't use their services. It is really that
> easy.
It's not that easy. If you provide email services to a large number
of people and someone they are trying to correspond with uses UCEPROTECT,
you are basically a
Am 04.11.2016 um 11:33 schrieb Marc Stürmer:
> Am 2016-11-03 15:34, schrieb MHielder:
>
>> A that old lie, that one has to pay to be removed again? Really?
>> Did it prevent people using UCEPROTECT within the last 15 years?
>> No, it didn't. The guys telling lies in the public just made fools
Am 2016-11-03 15:34, schrieb MHielder:
A that old lie, that one has to pay to be removed again? Really?
Did it prevent people using UCEPROTECT within the last 15 years?
No, it didn't. The guys telling lies in the public just made fools out
of themselves.
The fact that every person interested
On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 17:32:00 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 15:34:04 +0100
> >MHielder wrote:
> >
> >> > Zitat von Marco :
> >> >
> >> > UCE Protect has a very questionable reputation, foremost reason
> >> > is that they do charge money for delisting entries.
> >> >
On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 15:34:04 +0100
MHielder wrote:
> Zitat von Marco :
>
> UCE Protect has a very questionable reputation, foremost reason is
> that they do charge money for delisting entries.
>
A that old lie, that one has to pay to be removed again? Really?
On 03.11.16 15:27, RW wrote:
On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 15:34:04 +0100
MHielder wrote:
> > Zitat von Marco :
> >
> > UCE Protect has a very questionable reputation, foremost reason is
> > that they do charge money for delisting entries.
> >
> A that old lie, that one has to pay to be removed again? Really?
No, not really. What
W dniu 2016-11-03 15:34, MHielder napisał(a):
UCE Protect has a very questionable reputation, foremost reason is
that they do charge money for delisting entries.
And no one knows who's behind them, since they do not publish this
kind of information. They want to stay anonymous, that's why there
> Zitat von Marco :
>
> UCE Protect has a very questionable reputation, foremost reason is
> that they do charge money for delisting entries.
>
> And no one knows who's behind them, since they do not publish this
> kind of information. They want to stay anonymous, that's why there is
> no easy way
outh Seward Street
> Juneau, Alaska 99801
> Phone: (907) 586-0242, Fax: (907) 586-4588 Registered Linux User No: 307357
>
> From: Joe Quinn [mailto:jqu...@pccc.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2016 2:56 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: uceprotect issu
, 2016 2:56 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: uceprotect issue
On 11/2/2016 2:46 PM, Marc Stürmer wrote:
Zitat von Marco <mailto:fa...@ruparpiemonte.it>:
Sorry, I know this is not uceprotect list, but I don't know how to contact
uceprotect, their contact form is unava
On 11/2/2016 2:46 PM, Marc Stürmer wrote:
Zitat von Marco :
Sorry, I know this is not uceprotect list, but I don't know how to
contact uceprotect, their contact form is unavailable.
It seems the problem starts on 30 october. Did you have noticed too
something about?
UCE Protect has a very
Zitat von Marco :
Sorry, I know this is not uceprotect list, but I don't know how to
contact uceprotect, their contact form is unavailable.
It seems the problem starts on 30 october. Did you have noticed too
something about?
UCE Protect has a very questionable reputation, foremost reason
Hello Marco, hello List,
There was a DNS issue we are currently investigating.
If your system still response a hit to any queries against our RBL
please flush your dns cache or use temporarily another dns resolver
until the cache of your upstream is cleared.
We apologize and will take steps to pr
16 matches
Mail list logo
