On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 17:32:00 +0100 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 15:34:04 +0100 > >MHielder wrote: > > > >> > Zitat von Marco <fa...@ruparpiemonte.it>: > >> > > >> > UCE Protect has a very questionable reputation, foremost reason > >> > is that they do charge money for delisting entries. > >> > > >> Ahhhh that old lie, that one has to pay to be removed again? > >> Really? > > On 03.11.16 15:27, RW wrote: > >No, not really. What he actually wrote was "they do charge money for > >delisting entries" and that's clearly true: > > It's for immediate delisting, not for delisting itself. > the delisting happens automatically, the fee is for doing it faster
Yes, obviously. But do "charge money for delisting entries" which is what was asserted
