hrows it in
the already scanned ready to deliver queue don't know if that is an
option for you or not..
-Original Message-
From: Adam Katz [mailto:antis...@khopis.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 9:49 PM
To: Spamassassin Users
Subject: Re: trust SMTP authenticated users
Arthur Ker
> On 10.05.09 22:49, Adam Katz wrote:
>> The best solution I've seen for this kind of thing is the POPAuth
>> plugin, which uses the IMAP/POP authentication tables (as populated for
>> the old fashioned POP-before-SMTP scheme) to temporarily add senders'
>> IPs to SpamAssassin's trusted_networks li
Matus UHLAR - fantomas schrieb:
>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 09:34, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>> But I'd recommend to use that one only if you know that your MTA won't be
>>> able to auth users and put the auth info into Received: headers.
>>> Using SMTP authentication is much much better than pop-
Matus UHLAR - fantomas schrieb:
> On 11.05.09 10:30, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> if you use spamass-milter patched
>> there is an option no to check sasl authed users
>
> I don't recommend skipping checks of authenticated users. Even they may
> send spam - some malware uses outlook's SMTP code (ha
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 09:34, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > But I'd recommend to use that one only if you know that your MTA won't be
> > able to auth users and put the auth info into Received: headers.
> > Using SMTP authentication is much much better than pop-before-smtp
On 11.05.09 11:04, B
On 11.05.09 10:30, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> if you use spamass-milter patched
> there is an option no to check sasl authed users
I don't recommend skipping checks of authenticated users. Even they may
send spam - some malware uses outlook's SMTP code (happened here a few times)
The issue was w
On Mon, May 11, 2009 09:34, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> But I'd recommend to use that one only if you know that your MTA won't be
> able to auth users and put the auth info into Received: headers.
> Using SMTP authentication is much much better than pop-before-smtp
POP-before-smtp is okay if
Matus UHLAR - fantomas schrieb:
>> Arthur Kerpician wrote:
I'm facing the following problem lately. Some of my users are
connecting to the mail server (qmail) through mobile phones and the
leased IPs from the GSM operator are blacklisted in spamhaus and
spamcop. So, they are usi
> Arthur Kerpician wrote:
> >> I'm facing the following problem lately. Some of my users are
> >> connecting to the mail server (qmail) through mobile phones and the
> >> leased IPs from the GSM operator are blacklisted in spamhaus and
> >> spamcop. So, they are using the smtp server with spamassas
Arthur Kerpician wrote:
>> I'm facing the following problem lately. Some of my users are
>> connecting to the mail server (qmail) through mobile phones and the
>> leased IPs from the GSM operator are blacklisted in spamhaus and
>> spamcop. So, they are using the smtp server with spamassassin 3.2.5
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
On lördagen den 25 april 2009, Arthur Kerpician wrote:
Hi,
I'm facing the following problem lately. Some of my users are connecting
to the mail server (qmail) through mobile phones and the leased IPs from
the GSM operator are blacklisted in spamhaus and spamcop. So, they a
On lördagen den 25 april 2009, Arthur Kerpician wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm facing the following problem lately. Some of my users are connecting
> to the mail server (qmail) through mobile phones and the leased IPs from
> the GSM operator are blacklisted in spamhaus and spamcop. So, they are
> using the smt
12 matches
Mail list logo
