> On Mon, May 11, 2009 09:34, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > But I'd recommend to use that one only if you know that your MTA won't be > > able to auth users and put the auth info into Received: headers. > > Using SMTP authentication is much much better than pop-before-smtp
On 11.05.09 11:04, Benny Pedersen wrote: > POP-before-smtp is okay if remote clients does not sit behind NAT There may be issue if the IP address changes, e.g. for DHCP, dial-up or DSL customer. > that problem is solved with smtp auth others are, too. That's why I said that I don't recommend auth using pop-before-smtp. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Save the whales. Collect the whole set.
