On Mon, May 11, 2009 09:34, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > But I'd recommend to use that one only if you know that your MTA won't be > able to auth users and put the auth info into Received: headers. > Using SMTP authentication is much much better than pop-before-smtp
POP-before-smtp is okay if remote clients does not sit behind NAT that problem is solved with smtp auth -- http://localhost/ 100% uptime and 100% mirrored :)
