kud...@netzero.com wrote:
> OK sounds great. I also wanted to mention that the test email does not get
> marked. Is the rule here below not correct in the users' .procmailrc file?
>
> .:0fw:
> | /usr/bin/spamc
> :0:
> * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> mail/Caughtspam
That looks correct.
Check the log to
"kud...@netzero.com" , users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SA 3.4.1 on FC22/sendmail with a .procmailrc not triiggering spamc
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 12:39:33 -0400
kud...@netzero.com wrote:
> We're running SA 3.4.1 with sendmail on Fedora Core 22. Every users has a
> .procmailrc
On 2016-06-08 18:53, Joe Quinn wrote:
Usually you don't want to be autolearning at all, and only train with
messages that have been reviewed by a human. It's very easy for a
Bayes DB to spiral out of control after even just one or two wrong
results.
will setting this to -50 make it autolearn s
On 6/8/2016 12:39 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
kud...@netzero.com wrote:
We're running SA 3.4.1 with sendmail on Fedora Core 22. Every users has a
.procmailrc upon creation of the user but we have some legacy users being
inundated. If I just create a /etc/procmailrc will SA look at that first?
Usua
kud...@netzero.com wrote:
> We're running SA 3.4.1 with sendmail on Fedora Core 22. Every users has a
> .procmailrc upon creation of the user but we have some legacy users being
> inundated. If I just create a /etc/procmailrc will SA look at that first?
Usually. However, it'll *also* be called
