OK sounds great. I also wanted to mention that the test email does not get marked. Is the rule here below not correct in the users' .procmailrc file?
.:0fw: | /usr/bin/spamc :0: * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes mail/Caughtspam ---------- Original Message ---------- From: Kris Deugau <kdeu...@vianet.ca> To: "kud...@netzero.com" <kud...@netzero.com>, users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: SA 3.4.1 on FC22/sendmail with a .procmailrc not triiggering spamc Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 12:39:33 -0400 kud...@netzero.com wrote: > We're running SA 3.4.1 with sendmail on Fedora Core 22. Every users has a > .procmailrc upon creation of the user but we have some legacy users being > inundated. If I just create a /etc/procmailrc will SA look at that first? Usually. However, it'll *also* be called before your non-legacy users' individual .procmailrc files. I would just either copy the standard file to your legacy users, or a minimal file with just the call to SA. > Does anyone have an example of a 2016-friendly local.cf file? I'm not sure what sort of advice you're looking for here, IME SA has been "pretty good" out of the box for the last few releases. About the only thing I'd recommend is if you intend to use autolearning with Bayes, to drop bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam to at least -0.1; the default 0.1 has a tendency to mislearn low-scoring spam as ham. (At one point the default was 0.7, but my experience was that any positive value tended to get spam autolearned as ham.) -kgd ____________________________________________________________ Affordable Wireless Plans Set up is easy. Get online in minutes. Starting at only $9.95 per month! www.netzero.net?refcd=nzmem0216
