On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 23:49 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 16:14 -0500, Chris wrote:
> > I'm having an issue with getting SA 3.4.0 when run as spamassassin -D -r
> > to report spam to SpamCop. The errors I'm seeing are:
>
> Ignoring the Perl warnings for now.
>
> > In m
On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 23:49 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 16:14 -0500, Chris wrote:
> > I'm having an issue with getting SA 3.4.0 when run as spamassassin -D -r
> > to report spam to SpamCop. The errors I'm seeing are:
>
> Ignoring the Perl warnings for now.
>
> > In m
On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 16:14 -0500, Chris wrote:
> I'm having an issue with getting SA 3.4.0 when run as spamassassin -D -r
> to report spam to SpamCop. The errors I'm seeing are:
Ignoring the Perl warnings for now.
> In my v310.pre file I have:
>
> loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SpamCop
20.11.2013 16:38, Benny Pedersen kirjoitti:
> Jari Fredriksson skrev den 2013-11-20 15:12:
>> I don't know. And I can't test it right now, the 4G has been down for
>> several days now.
>
> same here in danmark, nearly no 2G mobil network either from telia, is
> telenor joined telia aswell in your c
Jari Fredriksson skrev den 2013-11-20 15:12:
I don't know. And I can't test it right now, the 4G has been down for
several days now.
same here in danmark, nearly no 2G mobil network either from telia, is
telenor joined telia aswell in your country ?
20.11.2013 14:56, Matus UHLAR - fantomas kirjoitti:
>> 19.11.2013 20:48, Matus UHLAR - fantomas kirjoitti:
>>> So, which address (domain) are you sending reports to?
>
> On 20.11.13 14:01, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>> What? SpamAssassin seems to send them to vmx.spamcop.net
>
> ok, so it is really th
19.11.2013 20:48, Matus UHLAR - fantomas kirjoitti:
So, which address (domain) are you sending reports to?
On 20.11.13 14:01, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
What? SpamAssassin seems to send them to vmx.spamcop.net
ok, so it is really the vmx.spamcop.net:587 that is blocked? Do they alllow
smtp.gmai
19.11.2013 20:48, Matus UHLAR - fantomas kirjoitti:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2013-11-17 20:13:
> I believe the point was exactly to avoid any MTA in path.
>>>
>>> On 18.11.13 00:34, Benny Pedersen wrote:
why ?
>
>> 18.11.2013 21:46, Matus UHLAR - fantomas kirjoitti:
>>> to avo
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2013-11-17 20:13:
I believe the point was exactly to avoid any MTA in path.
On 18.11.13 00:34, Benny Pedersen wrote:
why ?
18.11.2013 21:46, Matus UHLAR - fantomas kirjoitti:
to avoid filtering, modification and delaying which often happens on
submission se
19.11.2013 00:52, Benny Pedersen kirjoitti:
> Jari Fredriksson skrev den 2013-11-18 21:14:
>
>> It's not good. TeliaSonera is doing no favor to Internet with the
>> restrictions on submission port. I swapped them out.
>
> well thay try the best to sell 4G, but would not make seperate APN for
> voic
Jari Fredriksson skrev den 2013-11-18 21:14:
It's not good. TeliaSonera is doing no favor to Internet with the
restrictions on submission port. I swapped them out.
well thay try the best to sell 4G, but would not make seperate APN for
voice and data
so if you have a hardware 4G router with
18.11.2013 21:46, Matus UHLAR - fantomas kirjoitti:
>> Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2013-11-17 20:13:
>>> I believe the point was exactly to avoid any MTA in path.
>
> On 18.11.13 00:34, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>> why ?
>
> to avoid filtering, modification and delaying which often happens on
> su
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2013-11-17 20:13:
I believe the point was exactly to avoid any MTA in path.
On 18.11.13 00:34, Benny Pedersen wrote:
why ?
to avoid filtering, modification and delaying which often happens on
submission servers.
if i used spamcop i could make a patch, but i
On 16/11/13 22:46, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
I reverted to my other ISP w/o such stupid restrictions. Happily I had
such option! TeliaSonera sucks.
Did you tried their technical support or networks technical support?
They might have a thing or two under their sleeve for happy people.
Eliezer
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2013-11-17 20:13:
I believe the point was exactly to avoid any MTA in path.
why ?
if i used spamcop i could make a patch, but i have more work to do,
lets say spamcop_nodirectmx.pm
I do not think those spams should be sent indirectly, because of many
possibl
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2013-11-17 17:23:
My submission address' *@spam.spamcop.net MX points to
vmx.spamcop.net that
has port 587 open.
On 17.11.13 18:23, Benny Pedersen wrote:
i forgot subdomain testing, since its possible to set recipient addr
in spamcop.pm, but this does not chan
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2013-11-17 17:23:
My submission address' *@spam.spamcop.net MX points to vmx.spamcop.net
that
has port 587 open.
i forgot subdomain testing, since its possible to set recipient addr in
spamcop.pm, but this does not change that it should not make a direct to
m
Jari Fredriksson skrev den 2013-11-16 13:14:
My current ISP seems to block my attempts to send reports to SpamCop
from SpamAssassin ---report.
Which port does it send to? If 25, can we use submission as an
alternate?
On 16.11.13 19:41, Benny Pedersen wrote:
nope your isp force port 25 route w
Jari Fredriksson skrev den 2013-11-17 00:34:
Oh puleese Benny tell me how? Was that my question or not? It was.
do i look like a spamassassin developer ? :)
hack spamcop.pm to not use $exchange but localhost in $exchange perl
variable
the mx lookup in spamcop.pm is last centory :(
not eve
17.11.2013 01:08, Benny Pedersen kirjoitti:
> Jari Fredriksson skrev den 2013-11-16 23:23:
>> 16.11.2013 23:10, Benny Pedersen kirjoitti:
>>> i just dont understand why spamassassin use remote submission anyway
>> Well SpamCop provides submission for *reporting*. What else could you
>> use for *rep
Jari Fredriksson skrev den 2013-11-16 23:23:
16.11.2013 23:10, Benny Pedersen kirjoitti:
i just dont understand why spamassassin use remote submission anyway
Well SpamCop provides submission for *reporting*. What else could you
use for *reporting*.
well postfix ?
spamassasin -r => submission
16.11.2013 23:10, Benny Pedersen kirjoitti:
> i just dont understand why spamassassin use remote submission anyway
Well SpamCop provides submission for *reporting*. What else could you
use for *reporting*.
--
jarif.bit
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Jari Fredriksson skrev den 2013-11-16 21:46:
I reverted to my other ISP w/o such stupid restrictions. Happily I had
such option! TeliaSonera sucks.
in danmark its not diffrent with that company, isps should keep doing
what thay know instaed of just want it all, without knowledge
good you fo
16.11.2013 20:51, Benny Pedersen kirjoitti:
> Jari Fredriksson skrev den 2013-11-16 18:14:
>
>> OK. Is it possible to configure a relay for the task? I could handle
>> this via a relay in another network.
>
> hack the perl module to only use submission on localhost, or check
> configs its not using
Jari Fredriksson skrev den 2013-11-16 18:14:
OK. Is it possible to configure a relay for the task? I could handle
this via a relay in another network.
hack the perl module to only use submission on localhost, or check
configs its not using your isp :)
Jari Fredriksson skrev den 2013-11-16 13:58:
Thanks, that is correct to me. But my ISP still refuses it... bummer.
your isp dont allow you to use gmail sasl-auth ? via submission ?
ask them for a beer :)
Jari Fredriksson skrev den 2013-11-16 13:14:
My current ISP seems to block my attempts to send reports to SpamCop
from SpamAssassin ---report.
Which port does it send to? If 25, can we use submission as an
alternate?
nope your isp force port 25 route with them, if you use dns it should
not u
16.11.2013 14:34, RW kirjoitti:
> On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 14:14:21 +0200
> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
>> My current ISP seems to block my attempts to send reports to SpamCop
>> from SpamAssassin ---report.
>>
>> Which port does it send to? If 25, can we use submission as an
>> alternate?
> It appears to
16.11.2013 18:54, Andrzej A. Filip kirjoitti:
> On 11/16/2013 01:34 PM, RW wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 14:14:21 +0200
>> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>>
>>> My current ISP seems to block my attempts to send reports to SpamCop
>>> from SpamAssassin ---report.
>>>
>>> Which port does it send to? If 25,
On 11/16/2013 01:34 PM, RW wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 14:14:21 +0200
> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
>>
>> My current ISP seems to block my attempts to send reports to SpamCop
>> from SpamAssassin ---report.
>>
>> Which port does it send to? If 25, can we use submission as an
>> alternate?
>
> It a
16.11.2013 14:34, RW kirjoitti:
> On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 14:14:21 +0200
> Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
>> My current ISP seems to block my attempts to send reports to SpamCop
>> from SpamAssassin ---report.
>>
>> Which port does it send to? If 25, can we use submission as an
>> alternate?
> It appears to
On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 14:14:21 +0200
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
> My current ISP seems to block my attempts to send reports to SpamCop
> from SpamAssassin ---report.
>
> Which port does it send to? If 25, can we use submission as an
> alternate?
It appears to be hard-coded to use the submission po
IIRC, the parameters in the Net::SMTP module you've shown are connecting
to the server $exchange on port 587 (message submission). The delay is
set there too - the value of 10. I seem to recall that's in seconds.
To reach $exchange, you'll need access outbound on port 587.
Someone else will hav
33 matches
Mail list logo
