Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2013-11-17 20:13:
I believe the point was exactly to avoid any MTA in path.
why ?
if i used spamcop i could make a patch, but i have more work to do,
lets say spamcop_nodirectmx.pm
I do not think those spams should be sent indirectly, because of many
possible issued between sender and recipient.
hmp, if sender have problems lets make workarounds, it would help
senders if spamcop was just a email supporter, not really as big as a
isp, to not confuse terms
If an ISP blocks sending to port 587 but allows port 25, it should die
asap.
i think isps have not gmail sasl auth submission support, but google
might get them all :)
