Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2013-11-17 17:23:
My submission address' *@spam.spamcop.net MX points to
vmx.spamcop.net that
has port 587 open.
On 17.11.13 18:23, Benny Pedersen wrote:
i forgot subdomain testing, since its possible to set recipient addr
in spamcop.pm, but this does not change that it should not make a
direct to mx spam mail on it self without postfix sending it
I believe the point was exactly to avoid any MTA in path.
if i used spamcop i could make a patch, but i have more work to do,
lets say spamcop_nodirectmx.pm
I do not think those spams should be sent indirectly, because of many
possible issued between sender and recipient.
If an ISP blocks sending to port 587 but allows port 25, it should die asap.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
2B|!2B, that's a question!
