On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 12:54 PM Henrik K wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 11:58:31AM -0500, Alex wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm using the latest SA from trunk and trying to get pyzor working. It
> runs
> > correctly to check a message from the command-line, but SA apparently
> fails to
> > properly pars
On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 11:58:31AM -0500, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm using the latest SA from trunk and trying to get pyzor working. It runs
> correctly to check a message from the command-line, but SA apparently fails to
> properly parse the output?
>
> Nov 20 11:55:21.970 [2531521] dbg: pyzor: open
On 22 Apr 2021, Eric Broch outgrape:
> pyzor.noarch 0:0.5.0-10.el7
Ah. Upgrade (pyzor moved, and is now found at
https://github.com/SpamExperts/pyzor). Pyzor 1.0.* fixes this and many
other problems, and is Python 3 compatible.
Hello,
Stupid questions:
What version of OS do you have? pyzor is compiled on install(ex: Gentoo)
or comes pre-compiled ?
Did you made any python upgrade lately ? All the modules have been
upgraded as well ?
Did you tried to remove it and install it again ?
Best regards,
Iulian Stan
On 202
pyzor.noarch 0:0.5.0-10.el7
On 4/22/2021 7:29 AM, iulian stan wrote:
Hello,
Stupid questions:
What version of OS do you have? pyzor is compiled on install(ex:
Gentoo) or comes pre-compiled ?
Did you made any python upgrade lately ? All the modules have been
upgraded as well ?
Did you tried
Thanks for all the replies.
1) I've removed
use_pyzor 1
pyzor_path /usr/bin/pyzor
from local.cf (The issue occurred even if commented anyway).
2) I do have
v310.pre:# Pyzor - perform Pyzor message checks.
v310.pre:loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Pyzor (Which, I think, is where
the err
Eric Broch writes:
> From: Eric Broch
> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:00:28 -0600
>
> Does anyone one have a solution to this:
>
> spamd[]: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen
> in response
>
> I have this in my local.cf
>
> #pyzor
> use_pyzor 1
> pyzor_pat
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 09:00:28AM -0600, Eric Broch wrote:
> Does anyone one have a solution to this:
>
> spamd[]: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen in
> response
>
> I have this in my local.cf
>
> #pyzor
> use_pyzor 1
> pyzor_path /usr/bin/pyzor
>
> Perusing the i
On 21/04/2021 16:15, Steve Dondley wrote:
On 2021-04-21 11:00 AM, Eric Broch wrote:
Does anyone one have a solution to this:
spamd[]: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback
seen in response
I have this in my local.cf
#pyzor
use_pyzor 1
pyzor_path /usr/bin/pyzor
I don't
On 2021-04-21 11:00 AM, Eric Broch wrote:
Does anyone one have a solution to this:
spamd[]: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback
seen in response
I have this in my local.cf
#pyzor
use_pyzor 1
pyzor_path /usr/bin/pyzor
I don't have this in my config at all. Maybe you are
On 01/06/2020 17:02, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 01/06/2020 10:38, RW wrote: bit of bulk mail gets listed.
On 01.06.20 12:13, Noel Butler wrote:
> That what started all the complaints, lot of users seem to be subscribed
> to a few news letters, the most common factor for them was Serveth
On 01/06/2020 10:38, RW wrote:
bit of bulk mail gets listed.
On 01.06.20 12:13, Noel Butler wrote:
That what started all the complaints, lot of users seem to be subscribed
to a few news letters, the most common factor for them was ServetheHome
now getting listed by pyzor, checking my own junk
On 01/06/2020 10:38, RW wrote:
> bit of bulk mail gets listed.
That what started all the complaints, lot of users seem to be subscribed
to a few news letters, the most common factor for them was ServetheHome
now getting listed by pyzor, checking my own junk folder, I found a few
general emails li
On Sun, 31 May 2020 13:35:28 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 31.05.20 10:51, Noel Butler wrote:
> >Anyone else noticed it seems to scoring much much higher FP's in past
> >few weeks?
> >
> >Ima disable the damn thing I think.
>
> not here.
> Aren't those e-mails empty or w/o text parts
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>>> On 31.05.20 10:51, Noel Butler wrote:
Anyone else noticed it seems to scoring much much higher FP's in past
few weeks?
Ima disable the damn thing I think.
>
>>Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>>> not here.
>
> On 31.05.20 08:15, micah anderson wr
On 31.05.20 10:51, Noel Butler wrote:
Anyone else noticed it seems to scoring much much higher FP's in past
few weeks?
Ima disable the damn thing I think.
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
not here.
On 31.05.20 08:15, micah anderson wrote:
here either. I've been noticing quite good results
Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
> On 31.05.20 10:51, Noel Butler wrote:
>>Anyone else noticed it seems to scoring much much higher FP's in past
>>few weeks?
>>
>>Ima disable the damn thing I think.
>
> not here.
here either. I've been noticing quite good results with pyzor
actually, and have thou
On 31.05.20 10:51, Noel Butler wrote:
Anyone else noticed it seems to scoring much much higher FP's in past
few weeks?
Ima disable the damn thing I think.
not here.
Aren't those e-mails empty or w/o text parts?
I hve noticed that fuzzy checks often hit on such mails.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas,
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2018-02-20 22:20, Alex wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does anyone know what could be causing this? This is on fedora with
>> pyzor-1.1.0-1.20170904gitd14e980
>>
>> Feb 20 22:08:07.475 [28639] dbg: pyzor: network tests on, attempting Pyzor
>>
On 2018-02-20 22:20, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know what could be causing this? This is on fedora with
> pyzor-1.1.0-1.20170904gitd14e980
>
> Feb 20 22:08:07.475 [28639] dbg: pyzor: network tests on, attempting Pyzor
> Feb 20 22:08:13.098 [28639] dbg: pyzor: pyzor is available: /usr/bin/
On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 13:52:32 -0500
Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a bunch of rules that rely on the results of pyzor, razor or
> DCC. The problem is that they also match on an empty or nearly empty
> body.
You can use
pyzor local_whitelist < email.txt
at very least it's a good idea to run
ec
Alex skrev den 2017-12-15 19:52:
Other ideas?
whitelist ?, dcc have whitelist, pyzor have whitelist if you run own
pyzord, razor have whitelist
how ?, all the 3 seen before content checkers should know your
internal_networks ips just like spamassin does
its not relevant imho on empty ema
On 2017-09-08 10:56, Steven Conrad Bayer wrote:
> is the Pyzor network down again?
Works for me now:
ahiker!2 itz$ pyzor check <
Mail/mail.net.spamassassin.users/new/1504861340.17441_1.ahiker
public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') 0 0
but it was down earlier this week, as discussed in
Hi everybody,
is the Pyzor network down again?
We receiving the following error when we execute 'pyzor ping'
public.pyzor.org:24441 (504, 'Reading response timed-out.')
Is there anybody which can confirm this too?
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:38 AM, RW wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:36:05 -0400
> Alex wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> >> > This is because the public server went offline today, thus the
>> >> > client waits until the default timeout which I think is 5
>> >> > seconds. You can configure the timeout to s
On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:36:05 -0400
Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> > This is because the public server went offline today, thus the
> >> > client waits until the default timeout which I think is 5
> >> > seconds. You can configure the timeout to something less.
> >>
> >> 5 seconds is pyzor's own defau
Hi,
>> > This is because the public server went offline today, thus the
>> > client waits until the default timeout which I think is 5 seconds.
>> > You can configure the timeout to something less.
>>
>> 5 seconds is pyzor's own default timeout (which you can change
>> via pyzor_options), but SA'
On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 17:56:01 +0100
RW wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 19:01:55 -0700
> Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>
>
> > This is because the public server went offline today, thus the
> > client waits until the default timeout which I think is 5 seconds.
> > You can configure the timeout to something less
On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 19:01:55 -0700
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> This is because the public server went offline today, thus the client
> waits until the default timeout which I think is 5 seconds. You can
> configure the timeout to something less.
5 seconds is pyzor's own default timeout (which you ca
On 2017-09-04 20:11, Alex wrote:
> I'm curious about the options people use for configuring pyzor with
> SA? I've always just had it with --homedir /etc/mail/spamassassin but
> I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something.
pyzor works fine without any configuration, or with an empty
configura
On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 15:40:18 -0500
Alex wrote:
> It appears to be working. I just hoped someone could confirm there was
> nothing further I needed to do.
You probably don't even need the --homedir, I just noticed
that I don't have a .pyzor directory in my home directory and
checking and reportin
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 2:37 PM, RW wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 11:26:05 -0800
> Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>
>> On 2017-02-11 18:11, David Jones wrote:
>>
>> > >pyzor_options --homedir=/usr/local/pyzor
>> >
>> > >What am I doing wrong?
>> >
>> > You were close. No equals sign:
>> >
>> > pyzor_op
On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 11:26:05 -0800
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2017-02-11 18:11, David Jones wrote:
>
> > >pyzor_options --homedir=/usr/local/pyzor
> >
> > >What am I doing wrong?
> >
> > You were close. No equals sign:
> >
> > pyzor_options --homedir /usr/local/pyzor
>
> But the pyzor
On 2017-02-11 18:11, David Jones wrote:
> >pyzor_options --homedir=/usr/local/pyzor
>
> >What am I doing wrong?
>
> You were close. No equals sign:
>
> pyzor_options --homedir /usr/local/pyzor
But the pyzor help text (shown when run without args) tells me there is
an equal sign. Besides, pyz
>This may have been part of the reason why I stopped using pyzor. Taking
>a second look now, but the configuration still seems somewhat less than
>obvious.
>I want to set the pyzor "homedir", that is the directory where the
>servers file lives. I tried (in local.cf):
>pyzor_options --homedir
Am 26.02.2015 um 14:01 schrieb Axb:
On 02/26/2015 01:26 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
i just started to play with "pyzor" according to
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsingPyzor which seems to work fine
in general
*but* i recentyl got an offer with two lines text, a footer.logo and a
PDF attac
On 02/26/2015 01:26 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Hi
i just started to play with "pyzor" according to
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsingPyzor which seems to work fine
in general
*but* i recentyl got an offer with two lines text, a footer.logo and a
PDF attachment as well as a twitter-notify
On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 11:27 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Chris wrote:
>
> >>> ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Pyzor
> >>> pyzor_path /usr/local/bin/pyzor
> >>> pyzor_options --homedir /home/chris/.pyzor
> >>> endif
> >
> > Would it be better if I changed the pyzor home dir
On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Chris wrote:
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Pyzor
pyzor_path /usr/local/bin/pyzor
pyzor_options --homedir /home/chris/.pyzor
endif
Would it be better if I changed the pyzor home dir
to /etc/mail/spamassassin and put the 'servers' file there?
In general that's a bett
On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 10:30 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Chris wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 07:20 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Chris wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 21:17 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Chris wrote:
>
On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Chris wrote:
On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 07:20 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Chris wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 21:17 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Chris wrote:
System is Ubuntu 14.04 LTS I use fetchmail linked with procmail.
Permissions on
On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 07:20 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Chris wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 21:17 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> >> On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Chris wrote:
> >>
> >>> System is Ubuntu 14.04 LTS I use fetchmail linked with procmail.
> >>
> >>> Permissions on the ~/.py
On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 07:20 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Chris wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 21:17 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> >> On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Chris wrote:
> >>
> >>> System is Ubuntu 14.04 LTS I use fetchmail linked with procmail.
> >>
> >>> Permissions on the ~/.py
On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Chris wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 21:17 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Chris wrote:
System is Ubuntu 14.04 LTS I use fetchmail linked with procmail.
Permissions on the ~/.pyzor/servers files and directory is:
drwxr-x--- 2 chris chris 4096 Jul 17
On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 21:17 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Chris wrote:
>
> > System is Ubuntu 14.04 LTS I use fetchmail linked with procmail.
>
> > Permissions on the ~/.pyzor/servers files and directory is:
> >
> > drwxr-x--- 2 chris chris 4096 Jul 17 09:28 .pyzor
> > -r
>
> From: Chris
> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2014 10:25 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Pyzor errors after upgrade
> System is Ubuntu 14.04 LTS I use fetchmail linked with procmail. Once
> mail is tossed to my other folders what's left i
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Chris wrote:
System is Ubuntu 14.04 LTS I use fetchmail linked with procmail.
Permissions on the ~/.pyzor/servers files and directory is:
drwxr-x--- 2 chris chris 4096 Jul 17 09:28 .pyzor
-rw-r- 1 chris chris 23 Jul 17 09:28 servers
Are you using this with sp
On 07/04/2014 11:21 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
there is no reason why sa-milter should know about users - it would require
adding new useless code to it. Especially not when there is no local user,
which is something spamd must take care about, so there's no need to
duplicate this job
On 07/04/2014 07:02 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I have read the man page multiple times. spamass-milter passes the local
part of mail recipient to spamd, which is not necessarily a username.
spamass-milter even can call "sendmail -bv" to get the user, but it still
may not be local user.
On 07/04/2014 07:02 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I have read the man page multiple times. spamass-milter passes the local
part of mail recipient to spamd, which is not necessarily a username.
spamass-milter even can call "sendmail -bv" to get the user, but it still
may not be local user.
On 07/04/2014 05:27 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I repeat: spamass-milter does not (and can not) know about local users.
On 04.07.14 06:30, Steve Bergman wrote:
SPAMASS_MILTER(8)
I have read the man page multiple times. spamass-milter passes the local
part of mail recipient to spamd, wh
On 07/04/2014 05:27 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> I repeat: spamass-milter does not (and can not) know about local users.
SPAMASS_MILTER(8)
-u defaultuser
Pass the username part of the first recipient to spamc with the
-u flag. This allows user preferences files to be used. If the
mess
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6995
On 07/03/2014 09:38 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I see you are next person (after me) who encountered this issue. Maybe you
could comment (or at least +1) the bug.
On 03.07.14 09:57, Steve Bergman wrote:
What do you think woul
On 07/03/2014 09:38 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 03.07.14 09:28, Steve Bergman wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6995
On 07/03/2014 09:17 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I have explained my position in the bug, link to which you removed.
Yes. I saw th
On 03.07.14 09:28, Steve Bergman wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6995
On 07/03/2014 09:17 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I have explained my position in the bug, link to which you removed.
Yes. I saw that you did.
then you should understand why I do not a
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6995
On 07/03/2014 09:17 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I have explained my position in the bug, link to which you removed.
Yes. I saw that you did.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6995
I try to trim my posts
On 07/03/2014 07:53 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Aha, this seems to be spamd fallback to 'nobody' user, usually with homedir
/nonexistent. spamc and spamass-milter have nothing to do with it.
I have modified my spamd to use different user as fallback.
On 03.07.14 08:43, Steve Bergman wrote
On 07/03/2014 07:53 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Aha, this seems to be spamd fallback to 'nobody' user, usually with homedir
/nonexistent. spamc and spamass-milter have nothing to do with it.
I have modified my spamd to use different user as fallback.
/nonexistent rings a bell. I can se
On 07/03/2014 03:52 AM, Axb wrote:
and for spamd it only applies IF you don't want to place the Pyzor
config in ~/.pyzor in the spamd's user homedir.
Actually, it's placing the Pyzor config in a single known directory
which I can easily monitor the permissions on. SA does the spam
checking,
On 07/03/2014 02:31 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
pardon me, but spamass-milter uses spamc, so pyzor is called from spamd.
That means, the above should apply for spamd, not spamass-milter.
On 03.07.14 07:26, Steve Bergman wrote:
The issue seems to be spamc (and thus pyzor) running as the re
On 07/03/2014 02:31 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
pardon me, but spamass-milter uses spamc, so pyzor is called from spamd.
That means, the above should apply for spamd, not spamass-milter.
The issue seems to be spamc (and thus pyzor) running as the recipient
user, when the message is actu
On 07/03/2014 09:31 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 02.07.14 13:47, Steve Bergman wrote:
I've been watching today, and have pretty much confirmed that if you
use Pyzor with spamass-milter, and have it run as the recipient user,
you do need to include a "pyzor --homedir /whateverdir/" in loc
On 02.07.14 13:47, Steve Bergman wrote:
I've been watching today, and have pretty much confirmed that if you
use Pyzor with spamass-milter, and have it run as the recipient user,
you do need to include a "pyzor --homedir /whateverdir/" in local.cf.
pardon me, but spamass-milter uses spamc, so
OK. So I replaced pyzor with a dash script to run it under strace and
log the output to to a file. What it was complaining about was (drum
roll, please) the permissions on /home/pyzor/servers. Which is odd,
because I'm pretty sure I set that file to be world readable and world
writable for test
On 07/01/2014 02:57 PM, Steve Bergman wrote:
On 06/30/2014 02:15 PM, Axb wrote:
As you don't mention what gue you use with SA it's hard to guess where
your Pyzor config files should be.
I guess I'm not quite sure what gue I am using with SA. Where would I
find that?
phatfingers meant "glue"
On 06/30/2014 02:15 PM, Axb wrote:
As you don't mention what gue you use with SA it's hard to guess where
your Pyzor config files should be.
I guess I'm not quite sure what gue I am using with SA. Where would I
find that?
pyzor 1:0.5.0-0ubuntu2
ancient, buggy, EOL version
Interestingly, pyzor 0.7.0 (the latest stable version) gives the same
error. And SA is not preserving the diagnostic output from it for the
admin to view, even with debuging turned on in both packages. Looks like
the bugs are in Spamassas
Hmmm...
My original question was "where's the traceback". Not whether this or
that project chooses to abandon its stable releases. Ubuntu 10.04 LTS
Server is supported until May 2015. And similar time-frame releases of
SA and Pyzor are supported until 2020 in RHEL/Scientific Linux/Centos.
I'
On 06/30/2014 08:58 PM, Steve Bergman wrote:
I'm getting:
"pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen in response"
I'm running Ubuntu 10.04 on the server, with the Ubuntu provided packages.
On 30.06.14 21:15, Axb wrote:
time to update...
pyzor 1:0.5.0-0ubuntu2
ancient,
On 06/30/2014 08:58 PM, Steve Bergman wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting:
"pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen in response"
on many Spamassassin generated calls to pyzor. In the case of good
emails, at least, the senders report getting a bounce, but the emails
make it through to the
--On Thursday, March 13, 2014 3:50 PM -0700 John Hardin
wrote:
I've moved the discussion over to amavis-users@. It is very clear that
current version of Amavis are utterly broken in handling SpamAssassin.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Architect - Server
Zimbra, Inc.
---
--On Friday, March 14, 2014 2:28 PM +1300 Jason Haar
wrote:
No - I don't use amavis. That's why I said "spamc" :-)
Well... The docs say time_limit defaults to 300 seconds (5 minutes). The
inconsistent scoring I'm seeing is all occuring under 5 seconds, so I don't
think it's related.
--Q
No - I don't use amavis. That's why I said "spamc" :-)
On 14/03/14 10:50, John Hardin wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Jason Haar wrote:
>
>> Just yesterday I manually pushed a piece of spam through spamc and
>> spamassassin and got a different score too. It ended up being caused by
>> "time_limit".
--On Thursday, March 13, 2014 6:25 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
wrote:
And here is another email, from the *same* user to the *same* user that
does not have RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI!!!
Mar 13 19:21:07 edge02 amavis[3918]: (03918-12) spam-tag,
-> , No, score=-0.148 tagged_above=-10
required=3 tests=[
--On Thursday, March 13, 2014 4:27 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
wrote:
This is missing RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI. This email originated on our MTAs, and
was delivered going through them.
This did too, and correclty has that rule applied:
Mar 13 17:00:08 edge02 amavis[39369]: (39369-17-3) spam-tag,
--On Thursday, March 13, 2014 3:50 PM -0700 John Hardin
wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Jason Haar wrote:
Just yesterday I manually pushed a piece of spam through spamc and
spamassassin and got a different score too. It ended up being caused by
"time_limit". "spamassassin" didn't listen to it wh
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Jason Haar wrote:
Just yesterday I manually pushed a piece of spam through spamc and
spamassassin and got a different score too. It ended up being caused by
"time_limit". "spamassassin" didn't listen to it whereas spamc/spamd did
and the email took a lng time to process
Just yesterday I manually pushed a piece of spam through spamc and
spamassassin and got a different score too. It ended up being caused by
"time_limit". "spamassassin" didn't listen to it whereas spamc/spamd did
and the email took a lng time to process - triggering the scores to
be different
I
--On Thursday, March 13, 2014 3:15 PM -0700 John Hardin
wrote:
> FWIW they're running amavisd-new, and we're trying to figure out why the
scores on MTA-processed messages are so much lower than when the same
message is passed through command-line SA in debug mode.
Hi John,
Interesting -- I'
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:48 PM -0700 John Hardin
wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> In looking at why some spam is still making it through, it appears that
> Pyzor errors block URIBL lookups:
I'm working with
--On Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:48 PM -0700 John Hardin
wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
In looking at why some spam is still making it through, it appears that
Pyzor errors block URIBL lookups:
I'm working with someone who seems to be having the same problem in 3.3.
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
In looking at why some spam is still making it through, it appears that Pyzor
errors block URIBL lookups:
I'm working with someone who seems to be having the same problem in 3.3.1
- thanks for noting this, I will take a closer look.
--
John H
Same here:
$ pyzor discover
downloading servers from http://pyzor.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/inform-servers-0-3
$ pyzor ping
public.pyzor.org:24441 (401, 'Unauthorized: User is not authorized to request
the operation.')
$
This explains the Pyzor errors I've had recently. .
--
fight apathy or don'
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Arthur Dent wrote:
Oct 06 23:16:04 sansome.org abrt[16484]: detected unhandled Python exception in
'/usr/bin/pyzor'
Oct 06 23:16:04 sansome.org abrt[16484]: can't communicate with ABRT daemon, is
it running? [Errno 11] Resource temporarily unavailable
ABRT (automatic bug
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 21:26 +0100, Arthur Dent wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 12:28 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
>
> >
> > Ah. That looks a lot better. "test" isn't a valid email so it's not
> > surprising that pyzor doesn't return a response. The second test, using a
> > valid email, shows that e
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Arthur Dent wrote:
I got fixated on the exit code of 1 which must be hardwired in my brain
as an error...
Same here.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB87
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 12:28 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
>
> Ah. That looks a lot better. "test" isn't a valid email so it's not
> surprising that pyzor doesn't return a response. The second test, using a
> valid email, shows that everything is (or at least should be) working
> properly. SA _is_
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Arthur Dent wrote:
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 10:51 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Arthur Dent wrote:
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 09:01 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Arthur Dent wrote:
OK - I don't know what the output means though!...
==
On 10/06/2012 08:47 PM, Arthur Dent wrote:
Oct 6 19:34:11.248 [14864] dbg: pyzor: got response: public.pyzor.org:24441
(200, 'OK') 0 0
Tried few different spam messages?
Maybe the Pyzor DB doesn't have a hash for one or the other..
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 10:51 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Arthur Dent wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 09:01 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> >> On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Arthur Dent wrote:
> >>>
> >>> OK - I don't know what the output means though!...
> >>> 8<
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Arthur Dent wrote:
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 09:01 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Arthur Dent wrote:
OK - I don't know what the output means though!...
8<===
$ pyzor -d --homedir /home/mark/.pyzor c
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 09:01 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Arthur Dent wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 15:27 +0200, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> >
> >> Oct 6 11:11:52.056 [10904] dbg: pyzor: opening pipe: /bin/pyzor
> >> --homedir /home/mark/.pyzor check < /tmp/.spamassassin10904BmyC
On Sat, 6 Oct 2012, Arthur Dent wrote:
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 15:27 +0200, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
Oct 6 11:11:52.056 [10904] dbg: pyzor: opening pipe: /bin/pyzor
--homedir /home/mark/.pyzor check < /tmp/.spamassassin10904BmyCb9tmp
Oct 6 11:11:52.344 [10904] dbg: pyzor: [10906] finished: exit 1
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 15:27 +0200, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
>
> Oct 6 11:11:52.056 [10904] dbg: pyzor: opening pipe: /bin/pyzor
> --homedir /home/mark/.pyzor check < /tmp/.spamassassin10904BmyCb9tmp
> Oct 6 11:11:52.344 [10904] dbg: pyzor: [10906] finished: exit 1
>
> Seems trivial to reproduce the
On 06/10/12 12:35, Arthur Dent wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 12:25 +0200, Axb wrote:
>> On 10/06/2012 12:14 PM, Arthur Dent wrote:
>>> I am trying to improve the performance of SA on my small home
>>> server. I use the sought rules, but though I would also include
>>> Razor and Pyzor. I am no stra
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 08:14 -0400, Alexandre Boyer wrote:
> Alex, from Nexus7.
> Boyaah!
==8<===
> > Oct 6 11:33:41.959 [11067] dbg: pyzor: network tests on, attempting
> Pyzor
> > Oct 6 11:33:58.504 [11067] dbg: pyzor: pyzor is
Alex, from Nexus7.
Boyaah!
Le 6 oct. 2012 06:37, "Arthur Dent" a écrit :
>
> On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 12:25 +0200, Axb wrote:
> > On 10/06/2012 12:14 PM, Arthur Dent wrote:
> > > I am trying to improve the performance of SA on my small home server.
I
> > > use the sought rules, but though I would als
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 12:25 +0200, Axb wrote:
> On 10/06/2012 12:14 PM, Arthur Dent wrote:
> > I am trying to improve the performance of SA on my small home server. I
> > use the sought rules, but though I would also include Razor and Pyzor. I
> > am no stranger to the command line and not afraid o
On 10/06/2012 12:14 PM, Arthur Dent wrote:
I am trying to improve the performance of SA on my small home server. I
use the sought rules, but though I would also include Razor and Pyzor. I
am no stranger to the command line and not afraid of compiling from
source (and that is what I did in the pas
On 2/4/2011 7:08 PM, User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I don't keep constant eye on the mail server logs but did notice that
> pyzor was not working. I've ping the server that I've been using for
> years:
>
> # pyzor ping
> 82.94.255.100:24441 TimeoutError:
>
> And see it is
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
