Re: dcc on empty email

Perhaps just check your old notes? :-P https://lists.apache.org/thread/6fspd1my9xjdjbz16zp7dk66vn44xccz On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 10:42:35PM -0400, Alex wrote: > Hi, > > I'm noticing DCC is triggering on emails with an empty body. I'd like to > create a hash that matches messages with an

Re: dcc on empty email

Hi, > I'm noticing DCC is triggering on emails with an empty body. I'd like to > create a hash that matches messages with an empty body and other simple > messages. > > What am I doing wrong? I've tried it with a zero-length file as well as > one with just a few characters. It looks like I don't u

Re: DCC/pyzor questions

On 14.03.22 20:15, Alex wrote: I'm seeing a lot of DCC/pyzor mail being marked as spam that shouldn't be, and want to see what can be done to prevent that. DCC contains fuzzy checksums of bulk messages, which means they have been seen on the internet multiple times. This includes common notif

Re: DCC/pyzor questions

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 08:15:49PM -0400, Alex wrote: > > How do I generate that signature? I've been unable to find any > instructions on how to do it. https://www.dcc-servers.net/dcc/dcc-tree/dcc.html dccproc -CQ < message Add to /var/dcc/whiteclnt "Hex ctype cksum starts with the string He

Re: DCC license

The DCC FAQ at https://www.dcc-servers.net/dcc/FAQ.html#license describes the definitive ways to get any questions answered regarding DCC licensing. Any answers you could get here would be conjecture and anecdote. I found a form on their website for licensing questions. Waiting to hear back.

Re: DCC license

On 22 Apr 2021, at 9:20, Steve Dondley wrote: Sorry if this is a bit off-topic. More than a bit. DCC is not owned, released, or bundled by the ASF SpamAssassin Project or any other part of the ASF. The SpamAssassin project doesn't have any control over DCC licensing or any particular expert

Re: DCC license

On 22.04.21 09:20, Steve Dondley wrote: Sorry if this is a bit off-topic. I'm looking into installing DCC (Distributed Checksum Clearninghouse) software. DCC has it's own users list. I don't see anything in there about disallowing usage of the software by "managed mail services." there's

Re: dcc-servers.net seems to have gone away

Great news. Everything looks good at this end. Thanks to all for your input. Judy. From: Kevin A. McGrail Sent: 23 May 2020 23:09 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: dcc-servers.net seems to have gone away Yes, all fixed. There was an issue with

Re: dcc-servers.net seems to have gone away

Yes, all fixed.  There was an issue with a domain name renewal. On 5/23/2020 2:33 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >>> On Sat, 23 May 2020 at 09:55, hospice admin >>> wrote: >>> > Looks like DCC/Rhyolite has stopped working. First noticed problems >>> > around 19:30 last night UK time. >>> > >>>

Re: dcc-servers.net seems to have gone away

On Sat, 23 May 2020 at 09:55, hospice admin wrote: > Looks like DCC/Rhyolite has stopped working. First noticed problems > around 19:30 last night UK time. > > Problem seems to be that DNS for dcc-servers.net has gone away. Have > checked with the likes of mxtoolbox and intoDNS and they appear to

Re: dcc-servers.net seems to have gone away

Well, crud. Anyone have a replica from before the records dropped they would be willing to share out? On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 5:12 AM Dominic Raferd wrote: > On Sat, 23 May 2020 at 09:55, hospice admin > wrote: > > > > Hi Gang, > > > > Looks like DCC/Rhyolite has stopped working. First noticed

Re: dcc-servers.net seems to have gone away

On Sat, 23 May 2020 at 09:55, hospice admin wrote: > > Hi Gang, > > Looks like DCC/Rhyolite has stopped working. First noticed problems around > 19:30 last night UK time. > > Problem seems to be that DNS for dcc-servers.net has gone away. Have checked > with the likes of mxtoolbox and intoDNS an

Re: DCC doesn't seem to be doing anything

On Apr 29, 2016, at 1:12 PM, RW wrote: I got the same, it only records the number scanned. I'm not sure what the reason for the zeros is, possibly it's because dccifd isn't working as a proxy. On 29.04.16 17:59, @lbutlr wrote: Thanks. I’ll just ignore the log line. you can simply stop runn

Re: DCC doesn't seem to be doing anything

On Apr 29, 2016, at 1:12 PM, RW wrote: > I got the same, it only records the number scanned. I'm not sure what > the reason for the zeros is, possibly it's because dccifd isn't > working as a proxy. Thanks. I’ll just ignore the log line. -- "Alas, earwax."

Re: DCC doesn't seem to be doing anything

On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:39:29 -0600 @lbutlr wrote: > On Apr 28, 2016, at 2:30 PM, RW wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:58:47 -0600 > > @lbutlr wrote: > > > > > >>> do you see any DCC_CHECK in spam headers? > >> > >> A few, but they always seem to be “1.1” > > > > What were you expecti

Re: DCC doesn't seem to be doing anything

On 27.04.16 18:38, @lbutlr wrote: I have DCC setup and enabled in SpamAssasin, but the only thing I see logged in maillog each day is: 00:00:00 mail dccifd[7397]: 1.3.158 detected 0 spam, ignored for 0, rejected for 0, and discarded for 0 targets among 0 total messages for targets On Apr 2

Re: DCC doesn't seem to be doing anything

On 4/29/2016 2:39 AM, @lbutlr wrote: On Apr 28, 2016, at 2:30 PM, RW wrote: On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:58:47 -0600 @lbutlr wrote: do you see any DCC_CHECK in spam headers? A few, but they always seem to be “1.1” What were you expecting? Like almost all SA rules it has a fixed score. Since the

Re: DCC doesn't seem to be doing anything

On Apr 28, 2016, at 2:30 PM, RW wrote: > On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:58:47 -0600 > @lbutlr wrote: > > >>> do you see any DCC_CHECK in spam headers? >> >> A few, but they always seem to be “1.1” > > What were you expecting? Like almost all SA rules it has a fixed score. Since the daily log line

Re: DCC doesn't seem to be doing anything

On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:58:47 -0600 @lbutlr wrote: > > do you see any DCC_CHECK in spam headers? > > A few, but they always seem to be “1.1” What were you expecting? Like almost all SA rules it has a fixed score. > and they occur in about a third of the messages in the Spam folder, In the

Re: DCC doesn't seem to be doing anything

> On Apr 28, 2016, at 2:34 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > On 27.04.16 18:38, @lbutlr wrote: >> I have DCC setup and enabled in SpamAssasin, but the only thing I see logged >> in maillog each day is: >> >> 00:00:00 mail dccifd[7397]: 1.3.158 detected 0 spam, ignored for 0, rejected >> f

Re: DCC doesn't seem to be doing anything

On 27.04.16 18:38, @lbutlr wrote: I have DCC setup and enabled in SpamAssasin, but the only thing I see logged in maillog each day is: 00:00:00 mail dccifd[7397]: 1.3.158 detected 0 spam, ignored for 0, rejected for 0, and discarded for 0 targets among 0 total messages for targets which appe

Re: dcc checks

On 02.03.16 12:48, Roman Gelfand wrote: >I have awl disabled and dcc checks configured. Why, sometimes, >spamassassin doesn't do dcc checks? On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:50 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: that has nothing to do with AWL. You have already asked in the DCC mailing list (and I ha

Re: dcc checks

Am 03.03.2016 um 00:07 schrieb Roman Gelfand: On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:54 PM RW mailto:rwmailli...@googlemail.com>> wrote: On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:48:18 -0500 Roman Gelfand wrote: > I have awl disabled and dcc checks configured. Why, sometimes, > spamassassin doesn't do dcc c

Re: dcc checks

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:50 PM Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 02.03.16 12:48, Roman Gelfand wrote: > >I have awl disabled and dcc checks configured. Why, sometimes, > >spamassassin doesn't do dcc checks? > > that has nothing to do with AWL. > > You have already asked in the DCC mailing list

Re: dcc checks

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:54 PM RW wrote: > On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:48:18 -0500 > Roman Gelfand wrote: > > > I have awl disabled and dcc checks configured. Why, sometimes, > > spamassassin doesn't do dcc checks? > > What makes you think that it doesn't? > this X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.4 require

Re: dcc checks

On 02.03.16 12:48, Roman Gelfand wrote: I have awl disabled and dcc checks configured. Why, sometimes, spamassassin doesn't do dcc checks? that has nothing to do with AWL. You have already asked in the DCC mailing list (and I have replied), why did you interrupt the conversation and brought i

Re: dcc checks

On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:48:18 -0500 Roman Gelfand wrote: > I have awl disabled and dcc checks configured. Why, sometimes, > spamassassin doesn't do dcc checks? What makes you think that it doesn't?

Re: DCC whitelisting

From: sha...@shanew.net Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:02:59 -0500 (CDT) On Wed, 10 Jun 2015, John Hardin wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jun 2015, Shane Williams wrote: > >> Two examples that I know are legitimate senders, but get caught by DCC >> (and pyzor in some cases) and other

Re: DCC whitelisting

>> On Wed, 10 Jun 2015, Shane Williams wrote: >> >>> Two examples that I know are legitimate senders, but get caught by DCC >>> (and pyzor in some cases) and other rules that push them over the >>> threshold are the SourceForge.net Project of the Month list and >>> various Netflix emails to cus

Re: DCC whitelisting

On Thu, 11 Jun 2015, sha...@shanew.net wrote: On Wed, 10 Jun 2015, John Hardin wrote: On Wed, 10 Jun 2015, Shane Williams wrote: > Two examples that I know are legitimate senders, but get caught by DCC > (and pyzor in some cases) and other rules that push them over the > threshold are

Re: DCC whitelisting

On Wed, 10 Jun 2015, John Hardin wrote: On Wed, 10 Jun 2015, Shane Williams wrote: Two examples that I know are legitimate senders, but get caught by DCC (and pyzor in some cases) and other rules that push them over the threshold are the SourceForge.net Project of the Month list and variou

Re: DCC whitelisting

On Wed, 10 Jun 2015, Shane Williams wrote: Two examples that I know are legitimate senders, but get caught by DCC (and pyzor in some cases) and other rules that push them over the threshold are the SourceForge.net Project of the Month list and various Netflix emails to customers (New Arrivals or

Re: DCC plugin for SA

On 01/21/2011 03:04 PM, Mark Martinec wrote: > -p 127.0.0.1,6277,127.0.0.0/8 Hi Mark, My installation should only use a socket: /var/dcc/dccifd srw-rw-rw- 1 dcc dcc0 Jan 21 14:24 dccifd # ps aux | grep dcc|grep -v grep dcc 5167 0.0 0.0 19808 348 ?Ss 14:24 0:00

Re: DCC plugin for SA

J4, > warn: dcc: dccifd -> check skipped: dcc: failed to connect to a > socket /var/dcc/dccifd: Connection refused > The socket is there: > srw-rw-rw- 1 dcc spamd 0 Jan 10 09:40 /var/dcc/dccifd > local.cf has :- > use_dcc 1 > dcc_path /usr/local/bin/dccproc If a Unix socket is giving you tro

Re: DCC plugin for SA

On 01/20/2011 02:28 PM, RW wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:49:56 +0100 > J4 wrote: > >> Good morning to all of you, >> >> This popped up in the spamd.log after a reboot (done to test >> everything worked after a reboot). >> >> warn: dcc: dccifd -> check skipped: dcc: failed to connect to a >> soc

Re: DCC plugin for SA

On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:49:56 +0100 J4 wrote: > > Good morning to all of you, > > This popped up in the spamd.log after a reboot (done to test > everything worked after a reboot). > > warn: dcc: dccifd -> check skipped: dcc: failed to connect to a > socket /var/dcc/dccifd: Connection refused >

Re: DCC plugin for SA

On 01/20/2011 12:08 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote: > On 1/20/2011 1:06 AM, J4 wrote: >> >> I had not realised it was in the repos - I just checked and it is. Damn. > > I'm surprised it would be in the repos. DCC is not Free Software. > > Warren Me too, but something is listed. Maybe I its something

Re: DCC plugin for SA

On 1/20/2011 1:06 AM, J4 wrote: I had not realised it was in the repos - I just checked and it is. Damn. I'm surprised it would be in the repos. DCC is not Free Software. Warren

Re: DCC plugin for SA

On 01/20/2011 12:03 PM, J4 wrote: > On 01/20/2011 11:58 AM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote: >> On 1/20/2011 12:49 AM, J4 wrote: >>> Good morning to all of you, >>> >>> This popped up in the spamd.log after a reboot (done to test everything >>> worked after a reboot). >>> >>> warn: dcc: dccifd -> check

Re: DCC plugin for SA

On 01/20/2011 11:58 AM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote: > On 1/20/2011 12:49 AM, J4 wrote: >> >> Good morning to all of you, >> >> This popped up in the spamd.log after a reboot (done to test everything >> worked after a reboot). >> >> warn: dcc: dccifd -> check skipped: dcc: failed to connect to a >>

Re: DCC plugin for SA

On 1/20/2011 12:49 AM, J4 wrote: Good morning to all of you, This popped up in the spamd.log after a reboot (done to test everything worked after a reboot). warn: dcc: dccifd -> check skipped: dcc: failed to connect to a socket /var/dcc/dccifd: Connection refused The socket is there: srw

Re: dcc: [26896] terminated: exit 241

Michael Scheidell wrote: > Micah Anderson wrote: >> In fact the whole thread here has continued on as a result of that very >> reason why Debian did not update it. I'll cite it again for you[2] >> "The Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse source carries a license that is >> free to organizations

Re: dcc: [26896] terminated: exit 241

On 4/22/2010 2:43 PM, Micah Anderson wrote: Ted Mittelstaedt writes: Actually it's not even that. The notion that Debian spent effort detecting and removing DCC source is rather farfetched. Sorry, but you are pretty off here. Debian does this all the time. I'm an official Debian Developer

Re: dcc: [26896] terminated: exit 241

Ted Mittelstaedt writes: > Actually it's not even that. The notion that Debian spent effort > detecting and removing DCC source is rather farfetched. Sorry, but you are pretty off here. Debian does this all the time. I'm an official Debian Developer and I have personally been involved in doing

Re: dcc: [26896] terminated: exit 241

On 4/22/10 5:24 PM, Micah Anderson wrote: In fact the whole thread here has continued on as a result of that very reason why Debian did not update it. I'll cite it again for you[2] "The Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse source carries a license that is free to organizations that do not s

Re: dcc: [26896] terminated: exit 241

Michael Scheidell writes: > On 4/21/10 1:25 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >> >> >> Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse quite obviously feels that they have >> captured enough fishes in the ocean and are making plenty of money now >> and so do not require all of the free advertising that inclusion of

Re: dcc: [26896] terminated: exit 241

On 2010-04-21 20:05, Michael Scheidell wrote: On 4/21/10 2:03 PM, Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote: The part of MySQL which is used in Debian (the code without the manual) is licensed under GPL. so, the same with DCC. Not as far as I can see. At both and

Re: dcc: [26896] terminated: exit 241

On 4/21/2010 10:39 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote: On 4/21/10 1:25 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse quite obviously feels that they have captured enough fishes in the ocean and are making plenty of money now and so do not require all of the free advertising that in

Re: dcc: [26896] terminated: exit 241

On 4/21/10 2:03 PM, Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote: The part of MySQL which is used in Debian (the code without the manual) is licensed under GPL. so, the same with DCC. Debian picks and chooses. mysql seems to have the exact same restrictions as DCC (actually, DCC looks more flexible)

Re: dcc: [26896] terminated: exit 241

Michael Scheidell wrote: On 4/21/10 1:55 PM, Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote: For most everyone is the key point here. IMHO software in Debian's main repository is required to be "free" for really everyone, amongst other things you can lookup in the DFSG. Open Source is not really open if you

Re: dcc: [26896] terminated: exit 241

On 4/21/10 1:55 PM, Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote: For most everyone is the key point here. IMHO software in Debian's main repository is required to be "free" for really everyone, amongst other things you can lookup in the DFSG. Open Source is not really open if you disallow certain people or

Re: dcc: [26896] terminated: exit 241

Michael Scheidell wrote: On 4/21/10 1:25 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse quite obviously feels that they have captured enough fishes in the ocean and are making plenty of money now and so do not require all of the free advertising that inclusion of their source

Re: dcc: [26896] terminated: exit 241

On 4/21/10 1:25 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse quite obviously feels that they have captured enough fishes in the ocean and are making plenty of money now and so do not require all of the free advertising that inclusion of their source in Debian gives them. Qui

Re: dcc: [26896] terminated: exit 241

On 4/21/2010 8:23 AM, Micah Anderson wrote: Michael Scheidell writes: On 4/15/10 5:35 PM, Micah Anderson wrote: M "The Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse source carries a license that is free to organizations that do not sell filtering devices or services except to their own users and that

Re: dcc: [26896] terminated: exit 241

Michael Scheidell writes: > On 4/15/10 5:35 PM, Micah Anderson wrote: >> M >> "The Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse source carries a license that is >> free to organizations that do not sell filtering devices or services >> except to their own users and that participate in the global DCC >> net

Re: dcc: [26896] terminated: exit 241

On 4/15/10 5:35 PM, Micah Anderson wrote: M "The Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse source carries a license that is free to organizations that do not sell filtering devices or services except to their own users and that participate in the global DCC network. . . you may not redistribute modified

Re: dcc: [26896] terminated: exit 241

Micah Anderson wrote: > This is version '1.2.74-4' from Debian... but now looking closer, it > seems as if dcc was removed after Debian Etch. It seems that it was > removed because the upstream authors changed its license to non-free > (according to Debian's DFSG) in version 1.30. This also means t

Re: dcc: [26896] terminated: exit 241

Michael Scheidell writes: > On 4/12/10 4:55 PM, Micah Anderson wrote: >> I'm getting a lot of these log entries ever since I've upgraded: >> >> Apr 9 22:31:14 spamd2 spamd[2774]: dcc: [26896] terminated: exit 241 >> >> > what version of dcc are you running? This is version '1.2.74-4' from D

Re: dcc: [26896] terminated: exit 241

On 4/12/10 4:55 PM, Micah Anderson wrote: I'm getting a lot of these log entries ever since I've upgraded: Apr 9 22:31:14 spamd2 spamd[2774]: dcc: [26896] terminated: exit 241 what version of dcc are you running? what did you upgrade? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO Phone: 561-999-5000, x 12

RE: DCC problems

On Tue, July 7, 2009 23:15, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: > Thanks. It was a firewall issue. with now turns into a html issue on maillist :) -- xpoint

RE: DCC problems

Thanks. It was a firewall issue. From: Michael Scheidell [mailto:scheid...@secnap.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 2:54 PM To: Rosenbaum, Larry M. Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: DCC problems Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: Recently I've started seeing message like this in ou

Re: DCC problems

Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote: Recently I've started seeing message like this in our log files: Jul 7 13:22:48 ornl73 dccifd[21907]: [ID 702911 mail.notice] no working DCC serversdcc1.dcc-servers.net dcc2.dcc-servers.net dcc3.dcc-servers.net ... at 64.124.52.232 208.201.249.2 Jul 7 13:22:48 or

Re: dcc reports

On Tue, 05 May 2009 07:57:37 -0400 Matt Kettler wrote: > Nicolas Letellier wrote: > > Hello. > > > > I use spamassassin 3.2.5 and Dcc 1.3.103. > > When I execute cat /path/to/spammail | dccproc, I have lines with X-DCC in > > headers. > > However, when I execute cat /path/to/spammail | spamc, I

Re: dcc reports

Nicolas Letellier wrote: > Hello. > > I use spamassassin 3.2.5 and Dcc 1.3.103. > When I execute cat /path/to/spammail | dccproc, I have lines with X-DCC in > headers. > However, when I execute cat /path/to/spammail | spamc, I do not have lives > with X-DCC headers. > > Why I do not have DCC lin

Re: DCC Warning

On 15.05.08 14:17, KelvinTang wrote: > All is good, except DCC. > > When I call dcc alone, the result is good: > > > $ dccproc -C -i sample-spam.txt > X-DCC-Rhyolite-Metrics: ns2 104; Body=many Fuz1=many Fuz2=many > repo

Re: dcc SA problem

made SA bugzilla ticket : https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5849 it explains why that don't work from local.cf file. thanks for the help anyway! On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 03:23:47PM +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote: > > On Thu, March 13, 2008 08:40, Anatoly Pugachev wrote: > > >

Re: dcc SA problem

On Thu, March 13, 2008 08:40, Anatoly Pugachev wrote: > Thanks, that helped. super > Any chance to make dcc plugin to work from local.cf or > user preference file? explain problem more in detail, any plugins works from local.cf and user_prefs only execption is it can not load from this *.cf u

Re: dcc SA problem

Thanks, that helped. Any chance to make dcc plugin to work from local.cf or user preference file? since as user, i can't change system installed files. On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 03:19:51PM +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote: > > On Mon, March 10, 2008 14:11, Anatoly Pugachev wrote: > > > /etc/mail/spa

Re: dcc SA problem

On Mon, March 10, 2008 14:11, Anatoly Pugachev wrote: > /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf have following directives: > loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC remove this line in local.cf find the plugin in one of the *.pre files and enable the plugin from there should fix the problem Benny

Re: DCC

you should also local DCC plugin before this directives, try to place loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC before any dcc commands in local.cf file On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:40:19AM +0530, Tarak Ranjan wrote: > Hi All, > I have installed dcc-1.3.85 , and my local.cf file is > use_dcc 1

Re: DCC

Have you unchecked the line below in your /etc/mail/spamassassin/v310.pre? I don't use DCC so I don't bother change mine, but I've read somewhere in the mlist repository saying that. :) # DCC - perform DCC message checks. # # DCC is disabled here because it is not open source. See the DCC # licen

Re: DCC Troubles

> > I am getting this continuously in my maillog log file running exim and sa. > > > > dccproc[18723]: open(/var/dcc/map): Permission denied > > ls -la ...? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls -al /var/dcc total 68 drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Jun 23 17:49 . drwxr-xr-x 23 root root 4096 Jun 23 20:14 .. dr

Re: DCC Troubles

Matt schrieb: I am getting this continuously in my maillog log file running exim and sa. dccproc[18723]: open(/var/dcc/map): Permission denied ls -la ...? I have DCC installed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa | grep dcc -i dcc-1.3.57-0.rhel4 Any idea what is wrong? spamassassin --lint –D ?

Re: DCC and Razor

Chuck Payne schrieb: Hi, When I first got spamassassin working, I had dcc and razor, but some where a long the way, they have stop scanning. I am currently running... SpamAssassin Server version 3.1.8 � running on Perl 5.8.7 � with SSL support (IO::Socket::SSL 0.97) I know that ddcifd is r

Re: DCC

On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 15:06 -0400, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 19:46 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > > Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > Not sure what this means, can someone help? All works fine on our > > > production SA 3.1.7 server. We are testing this SA 3.2 with Maia > >

Re: DCC

On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 19:46 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > > Not sure what this means, can someone help? All works fine on our > > production SA 3.1.7 server. We are testing this SA 3.2 with Maia > > Mailguard and now getting this unsupported command -H error... > >

Re: DCC

Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > Not sure what this means, can someone help? All works fine on our > production SA 3.1.7 server. We are testing this SA 3.2 with Maia > Mailguard and now getting this unsupported command -H error... > > [47129] dbg: dcc: [47132] finished: exit=0x0100 > [47129] dbg: dcc:

Re: dcc HOWTO?

On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Thomas Cameron wrote: hI, > All - > > I'm using Sendmail on RHEL 4 with SA and spamass-milter, clamav-milter > and milter-greylist. What is the best way for SpamAssassin to use DCC? > > So far I've created an RPM with these configure options: > > ./configure \ > --homedir=

Re: DCC worth it?

Based on how far their mailing lists go back, Razor and DCC have been around since the 2000/2001 time period, and as far as I can tell were independent projects. In fact, they're based on different goals/models, which is why it's useful to use both of them. Razor is interested in specifically id

Re: DCC worth it?

On Thursday 19 October 2006 01:01, Leander Koornneef wrote: > . Giampaolo's comments are   > also valid: if they both > hit, you get higher scores, which may just be enough to push a spam   > above your required_score. Ah, well then that's not an issue for me. If razor-50-100 hits its already spa

Re: DCC worth it?

Matt Kettler wrote: Which policy change is that? And what community has DCC lost support in? (and then he answers his own question) that's not exactly recent. (Spring 2005) Sorry, after doing this for 20 years anything that happened a year ago is "recent". Sorry if that confused you. I'

RE: DCC worth it?

Leander Koornneef wrote: > On 19-okt-2006, at 10:15, Jo Rhett wrote: > > John Andersen wrote: > > > Contemplating adding DCC to my SA config. I already do the > > > SURBL tests and Razor2. Will I likely gain any thing via this? > > > Does DCC catch what other tests miss? > > > > DCC and Razor are

Re: DCC worth it?

My statistics look like this. This is from one lower volume server and is only since logs rotated at 4am Sunday morning. DCC - 38,521 (DCC_CHECK) Razor - 52,596 (RAZOR2_CHECK) Pyzor - 11,201 (PYZOR_CHECK) And for the heck of it: DIGEST_MULTIPLE 38,562 Bill -

Re: DCC worth it?

This seems to extreme to be true. I think you need to fix your DCC setup :-) On 19-okt-2006, at 15:19, Coffey, Neal wrote: John Andersen wrote: Contemplating adding DCC to my SA config. I already do the SURBL tests and Razor2. Will I likely gain any thing via this? Does DCC catch what ot

RE: DCC worth it?

John Andersen wrote: > Contemplating adding DCC to my SA config. > > I already do the SURBL tests and Razor2. > Will I likely gain any thing via this? Does DCC catch what other > tests miss? For what it's worth, this is from seven days of logging on my company's mail server: $ zgrep "RAZOR2_" s

Re: DCC worth it?

I use DCC, Razor and Pyzor. I only installed Pyzor because I thought the more opinions I get on an email the better. By using all 3 I get more spam emails rejected than if I just use DCC and Razor. It helps raise the score of the spam emails. Bill - Original Message - From:

Re: DCC worth it?

Jeff Moss wrote: > pain in the butt. In particular dealing with its log files. By default > it creates thousands of them a day. There is a way to cut that down to > hundreds a day by editing the configuration file. But you still have > to run a cron job to keep them from eating your hard drive.

RE: DCC worth it?

John Andersen wrote: > Contemplating adding DCC to my SA config. > > I already do the SURBL tests and Razor2. > Will I likely gain any thing via this? Does DCC catch what other > tests miss? DCC can be configured to run as a service called dccifd. It's much faster than loading Razor or Pyzor

Re: DCC worth it?

Jo Rhett wrote: > John Andersen wrote: >> Contemplating adding DCC to my SA config. >> I already do the SURBL tests and Razor2. >> Will I likely gain any thing via this? Does DCC catch what other >> tests miss? > > DCC and Razor are very similar in approach. DCC has recently lost a > lot of comm

Re: DCC worth it?

In my experience (which is not statistically comfirmed), Razor catches more spam than DCC. Usually if DCC hits, then Razor will probably also hit. This is not true the other way around: if Razor hits, DCC regularly doesn't hit. Giampaolo's comments are also valid: if they both hit, you get hi

Re: DCC worth it?

John Andersen wrote: Contemplating adding DCC to my SA config. I already do the SURBL tests and Razor2. Will I likely gain any thing via this? Does DCC catch what other tests miss? DCC and Razor are very similar in approach. DCC has recently lost a lot of community support due to policy d

Re: dcc whiteclnt support broken in SA 3.1.x?

Justin Mason wrote: > Matt Kettler writes: > >> What's going on? What magic do I need to make whiteclnt work properly in >> a SA 3.1.x environment when using dccifd? >> > > er, I think it'd need to be implemented ;) > > The whole idea of manually whitelisting all the DCC FPs is anathema to

Re: dcc whiteclnt support broken in SA 3.1.x?

Matt Kettler writes: > I recently have been fighting with making DCC work properly on a SA > 3.1.x install. > > I have several high-volume mailing lists, that repeatedly hit DCC, so I > did what every good DCC user should do. I added an "ok" for the envelope > from to my whiteclnt file, make sure

Re: DCC in SA 3.1.3

Benny Pedersen wrote: On Mon, August 21, 2006 02:54, LDB wrote: Does SA support DCC anymore? The directives I used a few versions back do not work anymore. yes, enable the plugin, if its still not, ask again where you provide more info on with version of dcc and sa you are running i only gu

Re: DCC in SA 3.1.3

On Mon, August 21, 2006 02:54, LDB wrote: > Does SA support DCC anymore? The directives > I used a few versions back do not work anymore. yes, enable the plugin, if its still not, ask again where you provide more info on with version of dcc and sa you are running i only guesing here, you have a

Re: DCC not active

On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, Claude Frantz wrote: hI, > In my /etc/mail/spamassassin/v310.pre, there is a line: > > loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC > > There is also a file: > > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/DCC.pm > > but DCC is not active. What is missing here ? > >

Re: DCC stops working.

User for SpamAssassin Mail List writes: I've noticed when my mail server starts taking a big load hit that the DCC stop working. I get lines like this in the syslog: Jan 4 10:59:21 mail dccproc[1051]: continue not asking DCC 227 seconds after failure Jan 4 10:59:21 mail dccproc[1052]: continu

Re: DCC hits of nonspam (message with drug ad image only )

Graham Murray wrote: > Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>The last mass-checks for 3.1.0 gave it a S/O of about 0.980, but I'm >>seeing more like 0.900 out of DCC at my site. Could just be the nature >>of my site, but about a dozen common subscriber newsletters at my site >>consistent

Re: dcc error

On 12/05/2005 07:02 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I did a search on that and saw this: > > DCC > Turn off IPv6 for dcc by editing the /etc/dcc/map.txt file: > > # turn off ipv6 > # http://www.rhyolite.com/pipermail/dcc/2005/002631.html > IPv6 off > > # public DCC servers > dcc1.dcc-servers.net

Re: dcc error

> I have told Spamassassin to do DCC checks but I am seeing this in my logs: > > dccproc[55]: socket(UDP): Address family not supported by protocol > > > What is causing that error? > > > 8) > I did a search on that and saw this: DCC Turn off IPv6 for dcc by editing the /etc/dcc/map.txt file:

  1   2   >