My statistics look like this. This is from one lower volume server and
is only since logs rotated at 4am Sunday morning.
DCC - 38,521 (DCC_CHECK)
Razor - 52,596 (RAZOR2_CHECK)
Pyzor - 11,201 (PYZOR_CHECK)
And for the heck of it:
DIGEST_MULTIPLE 38,562
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: Giampaolo Tomassoni
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 8:23 AM
Subject: R: DCC worth it?
> I use DCC, Razor and Pyzor.
It is quite like my conf.
> I only installed Pyzor because I
> thought the
> more opinions I get on an email the better. By using all 3 I get more spam
> emails rejected than if I just use DCC and Razor. It helps raise the score
> of the spam emails.
I have pyzor too, but I'm not shure it is actually working: I don't get
anymore a PYZOR_something tag in suspicious e-mails. This started happening
a couple of weeks ago. Also, anonymous reporting to pyzor seems simply
ineffective to me.
What's your feedback about this?
> Bill
giampaolo
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Andersen
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 3:07 AM
> Subject: DCC worth it?
>
>
> Contemplating adding DCC to my SA config.
>
> I already do the SURBL tests and Razor2.
> Will I likely gain any thing via this? Does DCC catch what other
> tests miss?
>
> --
> _____________________________________
> John Andersen
>
