Am 03.03.2016 um 00:07 schrieb Roman Gelfand:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:54 PM RW <rwmailli...@googlemail.com <mailto:rwmailli...@googlemail.com>> wrote: On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:48:18 -0500 Roman Gelfand wrote: > I have awl disabled and dcc checks configured. Why, sometimes, > spamassassin doesn't do dcc checks? What makes you think that it doesn't? this X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,BAYES_999, HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Pyzor: Reported 0 times. as opposed to X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=6.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,BAYES_999,DCC_CHECK, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2
DCC_CHECK mieans it *hitted* as well as RAZOR2_CHECK and PYZOR_CHECK the *_CHCK meta-rules are re-used for DIGEST_MULTIPLEwhy don't you just read the rule descriptions which are also part of the report-headers?
cat /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org/*.cf | grep DCC_CHECK
# DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,DCC_CHECK,DRASTIC_REDUCED,FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS meta DIGEST_MULTIPLE RAZOR2_CHECK + DCC_CHECK + PYZOR_CHECK > 1 full DCC_CHECK eval:check_dcc() describe DCC_CHECK Detected as bulk mail by DCC (dcc-servers.net) tflags DCC_CHECK net reuse DCC_CHECK
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
